The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genomic dna uls labeling kit

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Genomic DNA ULS Labeling Kit is a product designed for the labeling of genomic DNA. It utilizes a Universal Linkage System (ULS) technology to facilitate the direct, non-enzymatic labeling of DNA samples. The kit provides a simple and efficient method for preparing labeled DNA samples for various analytical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using genomic dna uls labeling kit

1

Mapping Murine Embryonic Fibroblast LADs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LADs from murine embryonic fibroblasts were defined through the LADetector algorithm, and complementary regions to chromosomes 11 and 12 were defined as non-LADs [9 ]. Data provided Geo GSE56990. Centromeres were excluded, and LAD and non-LADs were repeat masked. Probes were selected in silico based on TM and GC content, and those with high homology to off target loci were specifically removed. 150 base pair oligos were chemically synthesized using proprietary Agilent technology and probes were labeled with either Cy3 or Cy5 dyes using the Genomic DNA ULS Labeling Kit (Agilent, 5190-0419). Forty nanograms of LAD and non-LAD probes were combined with hybridization solution (10% dextran sulfate, 50% formamide, 2X SSC) then denatured at 98°C for 5 min and pre-annealed at 37°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Array-based CGH analyses were performed with Agilent SurePrint G3 human CGH microarray 1×1M (G4447A, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) and Genomic DNA ULS Labeling Kit (#5190-0419, Agilent) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Human Genomic DNA (G1521 and G1471, Promega) was used as the control. The array slides were scanned using Agilent G2565BA microarray scanner (Agilent) at the Medical Research Support Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Oligonucleotide Microarray-Based CGH Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Array-CGH was performed on 8 × 60k oligonucleotide microarrays (Agilent Technologies, CA). DNA was labeled (cyanine 3 or cyanine 5) using the Genomic DNA ULS Labeling Kit from Agilent Technologies and hybridized onto the microarrays according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Agilent). Scanning of the microarrays was performed using a G2565CA scanner (Agilent). Data analysis was carried out with Agilent Technologies software, namely Feature Extraction for Cytogenomics V5.0 for the fluorescence ratio calculation and Agilent CytoGenomics 3.0.1.1 to visualize chromosomal imbalances. Deletions and duplications in the heterozygous state were characterized by values of the log2 ratio of fluorescence intensities (cyanine5/cyanine3) below −0.5 and above + 0.3, respectively, with the statistical algorithm ADM2 used at a threshold of 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genome Copy Number Profiling of Tumor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA isolated from fresh/frozen cells was enzymatically labeled using the SureTag Labeling System (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and DNA from FFPE tumor tissue was labeled using the Genomic DNA ULS Labeling Kit (Agilent) as described previously32 (link). Sex-matched human genomic DNA (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was used as reference. Labeled DNA was hybridized to SurePrint G3 CGH 8X60K microarrays (Agilent). Microarrays were scanned with microarray scanner G2565BA (Agilent) and microarray images were processed by Feature Extraction software version 10.7.3.1 (Agilent). Data were visualized and analyzed using Nexus Copy Number software version 9.0 (BioDiscovery, Inc., El Segundo, CA, USA). Clustering was done using the average linkage hierarchical clustering algorithm. The percentage of genome detected concordantly as gain, loss or neutral between parental tumor and derived cell line was calculated (overlap/overlapping calls).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Molecular Serotyping of Pneumococci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Molecular serotyping of pneumococci was performed by DNA microarray. An aliquot of the nasopharyngeal swab was inoculated onto Horse Blood Agar supplemented with gentamicin (5 μg/ml), to select for pneumococci, and incubated overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2. For plates with α-hemolytic growth, the bacterial growth was collected using 1 ml PBS, pelleted by centrifugation and stored at -30°C. DNA was extracted from thawed bacterial pellets using the QIAcube HT with the QIAamp 96 DNA QIAcube HT Kit (Qiagen) with the inclusion of a pre-treatment lysis step whereby 180 μl lysis buffer (20 mM TrisHCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mg/ml RNase A, 20 mg/ml lysozyme) was added to the bacterial pellet and incubated at 37ºC for 60 min. The remaining extraction procedure was as per the manufacturer’s instructions. This DNA was then used for microarray as described previously [12 (link)]. In brief, 200 ng of DNA was labelled with Cy3 or Cy5 using the Genomic DNA ULS Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies) and incubated at 85°C for 30 min. The labelled pneumococcal DNA was incubated with Senti-SPv1.5 microarray slides (BUGS Bioscience) overnight at 65°C rotating at 20 rpm. Microarray slides were washed, scanned, and analyzed using the Agilent microarray scanner and feature extraction software. Serotype calls were analyzed by Senti-NET software (BUGS Bioscience) using Bayesian-based algorithms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

iPSC Genome Integrity Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Here, we performed array-based comparative genomic hybridization to demonstrate that there was no chromosome aberration after the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome-editing intervention. The genomic DNA of iPSCs with a low passage number (4th–7th passage) was isolated and intermittently sonicated using a Digital Sonifier 450 sonicator probe (Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT, USA). DNA samples were amplified using the GenomePlex WGA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A Genomic DNA ULS Labeling Kit (Agilent) was used to label the amplified DNA with either Cy3 or Cy5. As recommended by Agilent, 2.0–2.5 g of amplified DNA were used as the input starting material for each labeling reaction. Scanning and image analysis were conducted according to the Agilent Oligonucleotide Array-based CGH for Genomic DNA Analysis Protocol (version 4.0). Microarrays were scanned using an Agilent G2565BA DNA Microarray Scanner (Agilent). Agilent Feature Extraction software (v9.1.3) was used to extract data from raw microarray image files. Agilent CGH Analytics software (v3.4) was used to visualize, detect, and analyze the aberration patterns from CGH microarray profiles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genome-wide Microarray Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated and intermittently sonicated using a Digital Sonifier 450 sonicator probe (Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT, USA). DNA samples were amplified using the GenomePlex WGA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Genomic DNA ULS Labeling Kit (Agilent) was used to label the amplified DNA with either Cy3 or Cy5. As recommended by Agilent, 2.0–2.5 μg of amplified DNA was used as the input starting material for each labeling reaction. Scanning and image analysis were conducted according to Agilent Oligonucleotide Array-based CGH for Genomic DNA analysis Protocol (version 4.0). Microarrays were scanned using an Agilent G2565BA DNA Microarray Scanner (Agilent). Agilent Feature Extraction software (v9.1.3) was used to extract data from raw microarray image files. Agilent CGH Analytics software (v3.4) was used to visualize, detect and analyze the aberration patterns from CGH microarray profiles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Functionalized Glass Slides for Bioassays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Indium tin oxide-coated glass slides (50 × 24 × 0.175 mm) with an ITO thickness of 17 ± 2 nm and a sheet resistance of 1200 ± 200 Ω/sq were obtained from Hans Tafelmaier Dünnschicht-Technik GmbH (Rosenheim, Germany). Me-O-PEG-(CH2)3-Si(OMe)3 with a MW of 460–590 D was bought from ABCR (#SIM6492.7, Karlsruhe, Germany). Avidin-Cy3 conjugate (#A4500-20) was purchased from USBiological (Swampscott, USA). Genomic DNA ULS Labeling Kit (#5190-0419) was supplied by Agilent Technologies (Vienna, Austria). Avidin (#A9275) and Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter untis (#Z648043-24EA) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Handels GmbH (Vienna, Austria). GelRed™ Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (#41003) was supplied by VWR International and Agarose NEEO ultra-quality (#2267.2) was purchased by Carl Roth GmbH (Karlsruhe, Germany). M13mp18 single-stranded DNA was purchased from NEB (Ipswich, USA). Conjugated DNA strand 5′-Biotin-TEG-/CTC GCT TCT GTC TAT CTT GGC-3′ were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Leuven, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Array-Based CGH+SNP Profiling of DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total DNA extracted from blood was submitted to the Baylor College of Medicine Genomic and RNA Profiling Core (GARP) for sample quality assessment and array hybridization. DNA extracted from patients and the reference DNA were co-hybridized to an Agilent SurePrint G3 Human 2x400K combined CGH+SNP microarray (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA; Product Number G4842A) (Design ID 028081) which contains ~300,000 CGH probes and 120,000 SNP probes with median spacing of 7 kb.
Briefly, genomic DNA (~1.5 ug each) from the patient and reference female DNA, NA12878, was digested by Alu I and RsaI restriction enzymes for 2 h at 37°C. The digested products were labeled with Cy3-dUTP and Cy5-dUTP fluorochromes using the Genomic DNA ULS Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies). The labeled products were purified, hybridized and washed according to Agilent protocols. Each slide was scanned on an Agilent DNA microarray scanner at the GARP, and data extraction was conducted using Feature Extraction software (v1.5.1.0 FE version) design files as the template for automated gridding with the (CytoCGH_0105_May11) protocol to assign spot-intensity signals and ratios for each extraction set. Data were displayed as log2 ratios.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Profiling Gut Microbiome Diversity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A community analysis was performed at the phylum and family level using the Human Gut Chip (HuGChip; GEO: GSE44752). The HuGChip is an explorative phylogenetic microarray designed to target the 66 bacterial families usually recovered from the human gastrointestinal tract, which provided positive correlations with data from pyrosequencing of amplicons and metagenomic analysis.20 (link) It consists of around 3 × 4500 probes established from a previous work and was synthesized by Agilent Technologies (Palo Alto, CA, USA) as a 8×15K microarray.20 (link) Bacterial DNA was extracted from a 0.25 mL sample of fermentation medium as described by Yu and Morrison21 (link) and followed by the Qiagen’s DNA stool kit (Qiagen Ltd, West Sussex, UK). Small subunit RNA coding genes were then amplified by PCR and purified using the MinElute PCR purification kit (Qiagen Ltd). One microgram was then labeled using either Cy3 or Cy5 (Genomic DNA ULS labeling Kit; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and hybridizations/washings were performed following the manufacturers recommendations. Microarray scanning was performed on a Surescan microarray scanner (Agilent Technologie, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!