The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Glp 31 conductivity meter

Manufactured by Crison
Sourced in Spain

The GLP 31 conductivity meter is a laboratory instrument designed to measure the electrical conductivity of solutions. It provides accurate and reliable measurements of the ionic content in liquids. The device features a user-friendly interface and is suitable for a variety of applications in research and industrial settings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using glp 31 conductivity meter

1

Comprehensive Characterization of Spent Liquors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The characterization of the obtained black liquors was determined using different laboratory analyses. The pH was analysed using a Crison GLP 21 pH meter (Crison Instruments, Barcelona, Spain). The density was determined by dividing their total mass by its total volume. The total dry solids (TDS) of these liquors was determined by drying samples in porcelain crucibles at 105 °C for 24 h. Afterwards, the samples were heated in a muffle at 575 °C for 3 h to measure the ash content [39 (link)]. A simple mass balance was performed to determine the lignin content of these spent liquors. Additionally, electrical conductivity was analysed with a Crison GLP 31 conductivity meter (Crison Instruments). All analytical measurements were performed in triplicate.
An aliquot of the different liquors was subjected to quantitative posthydrolysis with 4% H2SO4 at 121 °C for 60 min to determine its monosaccharides, acetic acid, furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) content. Afterwards, the resulting supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-µm membrane filter before high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. HPLC analyses were performed using an Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad, Berkeley, CA, USA) at 30 °C eluted with 0.01 M H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.6 mL∙min−1 using a refractive index (RI) detector to quantify glucose, xylose, arabinose, acetic acid, HMF and furfural [49 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Cell Membrane Stability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell Membrane Stability (CMS) was evaluated as previously reported (Rampino et al., 2020); 3.5 cm long leaf segments were rinsed in distilled water, placed in a closed tube with 2 mL of distilled water, and incubated at 50 °C for 1 h (T1), while controls were kept at 10 °C (C1). 8 mL of distilled water were then added to each tube and the tubes were incubated at 10 °C for 24 h. When samples reached room temperature, conductivity of the solution was measured using a Crison GLP 31 conductivity meter (Crison Instruments, Barcelona, Spain). Samples were autoclaved at 100 °C/0.10 MPa for 15 min (T2, C2) and the conductivity was measured again. Ten replicates for each cultivar (cv) were analyzed, and CMS was calculated as follows:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electrical Conductivity Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The electrical conductivity of the samples was measured by means of a Crison GLP 31 conductivity meter, which works with an alternating current of 500 Hz and a voltage of 4.5 V. The measuring cell Hach 52 92 connected to it operates in a range from 0.2 µS·cm−1 to 100 mS·cm−1. It also allows a working temperature range from −30 to 80 °C with a repeatability of 0.5%, it being possible to measure at higher temperatures as long as these are very stable. A Julabo F25 thermostatic bath controlled the temperature with an uncertainty of 0.1 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Carboxylate Content Determination in Cellulose Nanofibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carboxylate contents of the different cellulose nanofiber samples were determined by the conductivity titration method [16 (link)] with some modifications. In brief, 0.1 g of dry pretreated pulp (TEMPO-oxidized or refined pulps) was dispersed in 500 mL of 1-mM NaCl solution, adjusting the pH to 2.5–3 by adding 0.1-M HCl. This suspension was stirred at 25 °C under nitrogen atmosphere over 30 min to exchange the sodium cations bound to the carboxyl groups by hydrogen ions. Then, it was titrated by adding 0.05-M NaOH. Conductivity was recorded during titration using a Pt conductivity cell 50–70 and GLP 31 conductivity meter from Crison (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain), and three regions were observed: the first one due to the presence of a strong acid (excess of HCl), the second one corresponds to the volume of NaOH required to neutralize the weak acids (carboxylic groups), and the third one due to NaOH excess. Carboxylate content (µmol/L) was determined according to the following equation:
Carboxylate content=c·(V2  V1)w
where V1 and V2 are the NaOH volume (L) consumed at the first and second intersection point, respectively; c is the NaOH concentration (µmol/L) and w is the sample dry weight (g).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chlorine Species Measurement in Aqueous and Gas Phase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conductivity and pH were monitored
using a Crison GLP31 conductivity meter and a Crison GLP22 pH meter,
respectively. Hydrogen peroxide concentration in all experiments was
measured using spectrophotometry following the formation of the complex
between H2O2 and Ti2+.28 (link) The chlorate concentration in the chlorine dioxide
reactor was measured using a Metrohm Compact Ion Chromatograph Flex.
The mobile phase consisted of 85:15 v/v 3.6 mM Na2CO3/acetone solution and was flowed at 0.8 mL min–1 through a Metrosep A Supp 7. The injection volume was 20.0 μL.
The chlorine species in the liquid reaction mixture of the chlorine
reactor were measured using an Agilent 300 Cary series UV–vis
spectrophotometer. The wavelength of chlorine dioxide was found to
be 360 nm. Other chlorine species as chlorite, hypochlorous acid,
and chlorine were detected at 230, 323, and 303 nm, respectively.29 (link) In the gas phase, two measurements were carried
out. First, 5 mL of the gaseous sample was taken and bubbled in a
solution containing 10 mL of water. The solution was also measured
spectrophotometrically. For the second measurements, 5 mL of the gaseous
sample was taken and bubbled in a solution containing 10 mL of KI
(1 g L–1), producing the transformation from the
iodide to iodine. Finally, the iodine solution was titrated with sodium
thiosulfate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Membrane Filtration of Spinach and Orange Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Characteristics of the membranes used in this study are reported in Table 1. Condi-tioning of the NF and RO membranes consisted of their immersion for 12 h in Milli-Q water prior to the experiment to remove conservative products. NF and RO dense membranes must be pressurized, where the extract was pumped through the system at 10 mL/min (maximum feed flow rate). The conductivity measurements of the extracts were taken (GLP31 conductivity-meter CRISON (Barcelona, Spain)) every 10 min until two measurements were equal and the membrane was considered pressurized.
A 30 mL volume of the extracts from spinach and orange matrices was filtered by MF, UF, NF, and RO membranes. A general scheme of the membrane test employed in this study is shown in Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Water Quality Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses of the chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), electrical conductivity (EC), and pH were performed following standard methods [16 (link)]. The methods were triplicated and performed with analytical-grade reagents (99% minimum purity).
A Helios Gamma UV–visible spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Granada, Spain) was used for the analyses of the COD. EC and pH were analysed with a Crison GLP31 conductivity meter and a Crison GLP21 pH meter. TSS were analysed following a standard filtration method [16 (link)].
Also, the effluent was characterised according to the saturation index (SI), determined following the ASTM International method [17 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!