The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using anti cd8 af700

1

Tracking Antigen-Specific T Cell Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C57Bl/6 mice (Thy1.2+) were challenged with DENV1, JEV, and YFV (five mice per group) by intraperitoneal injection with 1 × 106 PFU or injected with saline. Five weeks after infection, the spleens were collected and the total T cells were purified by magnetic column using the Pan T Cell Isolation Kit II (mouse; MACS Miltenyi Biotec). C57Bl/6 mice (Thy1.1+) received an adoptive transfer by tail vein injection of 1 × 106 total T cells per mouse, with either T cells purified from mice exposed to DENV1, YFV, JEV, or saline. The mice were challenged with DENV1 24 hours after transfer, and after 6 days, popliteal LNs were collected and prepared as single-cell suspensions for flow cytometry. The cells were stained using the following primary conjugated antibodies: anti-Thy1.2–PerCP Cy5.5 (BioLegend), anti-CD4–BV650, anti-CD8–AF700, anti-CD44–BV510, anti-CD62L–PE-Cy7, CD69-FITC (all from BD Biosciences), anti-Bcl6–AF647 (BioLegend), anti–PD-1–BV711 (BioLegend), and anti-CXCR5–BV421 (BioLegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PD-1 Expression on CD8+ Memory T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryopreserved PBMNCs were thawed, incubated with an Fc receptor blocking reagent (ChromPure Mouse IgG, Jackson ImmunoResearch Suffolk, UK) to inhibit non-specific binding before incubated with the following, pre-titrated antibodies (all from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA): anti-CD3 V450, anti-CD45RO FITC, anti-PD-1 (CD279) PE, and anti-CD8 AF700. Flow cytometry was acquired by a LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) and data analyzed using FlowJo version 10.2 (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR). Compensation was performed using BD CompBeads (BD Biosciences). Applying gating strategies based on unstained controls and for PD-1 the fluorescence minus one (FMO), the expression of PD-1 was measured on CD3+/CD45RO+/CD8+ singlets and given by the median fluorescense intensity (MFI) (Supplementary Figure 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying and Phenotyping CMV and WT1-Specific T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CMV-specific T cells (CMV-CTL) and WT1-specific T cells (WT1-CTL) frequencies were quantified and phenotyped in patients by staining with PE-A*0201 CMVNLVPMVATV Dextramer, PE-A*0201 WT1RMFPNAPYL Dextramer and APC-A*0201 WT1SLGEQQYSV Dextramer (Immudex, Copenhagen, Denmark) (Supplementary Figure 1). Briefly, PBMCs were stained with Dextramers for 30 min at room temperature. Anti-CD3-Brilliant Violet 570, anti-CD4-Brilliant Violet 510, anti-CCR7-Brilliant Violet 421, anti-CD45RA–FITC, anti-PD-1-PE Cy7 (from Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CTLA-4–PE Cy5, anti-CD8-AF700 (from BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA) and anti-TIM-3–PerCP eFlour 710 (from eBioscience, USA) were added for the final 20 minutes of incubation. Surface expression of CD45RA and CCR7 was used to characterize naïve (TNaive, CD45RA+CCR7+), central memory (TCM, CD45RA-CCR7+), effector memory (TEM, CD45RA-CCR7-), and terminally differentiated (TEMRA, CD45RA+CCR7-) phenotypes (Supplementary Figure 2). Appropriate isotype controls or fluorescence minus one control for each fluorochrome were used to assess for nonspecific staining and determine gating strategy, respectively. FACS Aria flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA) and FlowJo software were used for acquisition and data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

CFSE Proliferation Assay with Tregs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryopreserved PBMC were labeled with CFSE (Invitrogen) and cultured in the presence or absence of fresh autologous CD4+ Tregs or Tconvs at day 7 of expansion with anti-CD2/anti-CD3/anti-CD28 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) at a 1∶1 bead-to-cell-ratio. After 4 days of co-culture, cells were stained with anti-CD3-PECy7, anti-CD4-APC (BD Pharmingen) and anti-CD8-AF700 (BD Pharmingen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Longitudinal Immune Activation Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryopreserved PBMCs from three timepoints (weeks 4, 8, 24) were thawed and stained with the following monoclonal antibodies (mAb): anti-CD3 APC-H7, anti-CD4 PE-CF594, anti-CD8 AF700, anti-HLA-DR PE, anti-CD38 APC, all BD Biosciences. Fixed samples were analyzed within 24h of staining using an LSR Fortessa (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo version 10.0.7 software (TreeStar, OR, USA). Anti-mouse Ig compensation beads stained with each appropriate fluorophore in the immune activation panel were used as compensation controls. FMO (fluorescence minus one) controls were used to set the gates for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and immune activation markers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry of Immune and Stromal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs and SFMCs were stained for flow cytometry using anti‐CD4 APC (clone: RPA‐T4, BioLegend, 300 552), anti‐CD8 AF700 (clone: RPA‐T8, BD, 56–0088‐41), anti‐CD25 PerCP‐Cy5.5 (clone: M‐A251, BD, 560503), anti‐PD‐1 AF488 (clone: EH12.2H7, BioLegend, 329 936), anti‐Gal‐3 PE (clone: Gal397, BD, 126706), anti‐IL‐2 PECy7 (clone: MQ1 17H12, BD, 560707) and nIR Live/Dead marker (Thermo Fisher, L34976), all at recommended concentrations. For intracellular staining the True‐Nuclear™ Transcription Factor Buffer Set (Biolegend, 424 401) was used.
FLS were stained for flow cytometry using anti‐CD90 BV605 (clone: 5E10, BioLegend, 328 128), anti‐ICAM BV421 (clone: HA58, BD, 564077) and anti‐PD‐L1 PECy7 (clone: MIH3, BioLegend, 374 506) as well as intracellular: anti‐Gal‐3 PECF594 (clone: B2C10, BD, 565682).
Flow cytometric data acquisition was performed using the NovoCyte Quanteon® (ACEA Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) and flow cytometric analysis were performed in FlowJo™ 10.7.1. Gating was performed by including live, single cells. Additionally, gating was performed using fluorescence minus one (FMO) control (Figure S1, Figure S3+c).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!