The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gsi 61 audiometer

Manufactured by Grason-Stadler
Sourced in United States

The GSI 61 is a diagnostic audiometer designed for comprehensive hearing assessments. It provides pure-tone, speech, and special tests to evaluate auditory function. The device offers a range of features and capabilities for clinical and research applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using gsi 61 audiometer

1

Mandarin Speech Perception in Normal-Hearing Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In total, 40 normal-hearing listeners (20 males, 20 females) were recruited in this study. Their ages ranged from 21 to 28 (average = 24.9) years. All subjects were native Mandarin speakers with no reported history of ear disease or hearing difficulty. All subjects were recruited from graduates of Shanghai Jiao Tong University and were tested at Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital. In all participants, audiometric thresholds were at the ≤25 dB hearing level (HL), bilaterally, at octave intervals from 0.25 to 8 kHz. Pure-tone audiometric thresholds were recorded with a GSI-61 audiometer (Grason-Stadler, Madison, WI) using standard audiometric procedures [23 ]. No subject had any preceding exposure to the sentence materials.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital. Signed consent forms were obtained from all participants before testing, and they were compensated on an hourly basis for their participation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Longitudinal Hearing Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this longitudinal study, we utilized three different types of data: (1) two repeated PTA tests, (2) an interviewer-administered KoGES questionnaire, and (3) physical health examination results. Audiometric testing was performed by special audiologist following Korean Audiological Society guidelines. Pure tone air (125, 250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 8,000 Hz) and bone conduction (250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, 4,000 Hz) audiometry was measured using a Grason-Stadler GSI 61 audiometer with Telephonics TDH 50P headphones (Grason-Stadler) in a double-walled sound booth.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hearing Threshold Evaluation and Acoustic Reflex Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We tested hearing thresholds at frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz (Grason-Stadler GSI 61 audiometer) in a sound-attenuating room. The degree of hearing impairment was defined by the pure tone average (PTA) threshold levels at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz, and was classified as mild (PTA 21–40 dB HL), moderate (PTA 41–70 dB HL), severe (PTA 71–95 dB HL) and profound (PTA >95 dB HL) (Study group on terminology, definition and hearing assessment, 1996; Martini et al., 1997 (link)).
Acoustic reflex thresholds were measured ipsilaterally and contralaterally to the stimulated ear (Grason-Stadler GSI TympStar impedance audiometer). They were considered absent when no response was found at intensities >110 dB HL.
In implanted patients, aided thresholds were measured (Interacoustic AC30 Audiometer connected to a Pioneer A 103 amplifier, JBL TLX130 loudspeakers) with subjects wearing their sound processor on user settings. Warble tone stimuli were presented in the free-field at octave frequencies from 250 to 4000 Hz. To avoid contralateral acoustic stimulation, the ear canal was occluded with an earplug.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Audiometric Thresholds in Diabetes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Air conduction thresholds were obtained for pulsed tones using a GSI-61 audiometer (Grason-Stadler, Inc.) and ER3A insert earphones (Etymotic Research, Inc.) in frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz, whereas HDA200 earphones (Sennheiser Electronic Corp.) were used for testing the extended high frequencies (EHFs) above 8000 Hz. Bone conduction thresholds were obtained at octave frequencies 500 to 4000 Hz to establish the nature of the loss, if present. Air conduction thresholds in each ear were averaged across frequencies to yield three distinct pure-tone averages (PTAs) for analysis: (1) clinical PTA of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz; (2) high-frequency PTA (HF-PTA) of 3000, 4000, 6000, and 8000 Hz; and (3) EHF-PTA of 10,000, 12,500, and 14,000 Hz. Thresholds at 250 Hz were analyzed separately. Any threshold that exceeded the limits of the audiometer was set to 110 dB HL for inclusion in the mean. Only one participant, an older individual with diabetes, had a no-response in the conventional audiometric frequency range that had to be set to 110 dB HL for inclusion in the mean calculation. It was at a single frequency (8000 Hz) in one ear. In the EHF range, “no-response” was obtained in a slightly greater number of subjects with diabetes (14/57 or 25%) than without diabetes (8/50 or 16%), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Audiometric Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and speech discrimination (SD) are performed at visits 1, 5, and 10 and the follow-up session by using a clinical audiometer (GSI 61™ Audiometer, Grason-Stadler, Minnesota, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Speech Recognition in Noise

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ability to recognize speech in background noise was measured using the QuickSIN (Killion et al., 2004 (link)) administered binaurally via insert (ER-3) earphones. The test consisted of low-context sentences spoken by a female talker. Each sentence includes five key words (e.g., “Tend the sheepwhile the dogwanders”). Six sentences were presented, one each at signal-to-noise ratios from +25 dB to 0 dB in 5 dB steps. In each case the background noise was four-talker babble (3 males, 1 female). The test was recorded on compact disc and routed through a Grason-Stadler GSI-61 audiometer. As specified by the protocol for the QuickSIN, speech levels were set to 70 dB HL for most listeners and to a “loud but ok” level for subjects with a pure-tone average of 50 dB HL or greater in either ear. The levels judged to be “loud but ok” ranged from 75-85 dB HL. The test score represents the signal-to-noise ratio required for the listener to repeat 50% of the words correctly. One practice list and two test lists were presented for each participant, and the two test list scores were averaged for a final score.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Hearing Threshold Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We tested hearing thresholds at frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz (Grason-Stadler GSI 61 audiometer) in a sound-attenuating room. The degree of hearing impairment was defined by the pure tone average (PTA) threshold levels at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, and was classified as mild (PTA 21–40 dB HL), moderate (PTA 41–70 dB HL), severe (PTA 71–95 dB HL), and profound (PTA > 95 dB HL) (study group on terminology, definition and hearing assessment, 1996) (Mazzoli et al., 2003 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Hearing Screening Protocol for Native English Speakers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty-six normal-hearing native speakers of American English between 18 and 34 years of age (mean = 22.72 years, SD = 3.51 years, 6 (17%) male) took part in our experiments. All participants were recruited from a population of students at the University of Iowa. Pure-tone hearing thresholds were measured using a GSI-61 audiometer (Grason-Stadler Inc., Littleton, MA) through TDH-39P circum-aural headphones (Telephonics Corporation, Farmingdale, NY) at octave frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz as well as at 3, 6, and 12 kHz (Figure 1). The pure-tone thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz no greater than 20 dB HL, as well as hearing symmetry within 20 dB for any tested frequency, were used as our hearing screening criteria. All study procedures were reviewed and approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board. All work was carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki), and written informed consent was obtained for everyone.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Audiometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following audiological and HA history, ear (otoscopic) examination to ensure ears were clear of cerumen, and immitance testing to ensure normal middle ear function, pure tone audiometry was carried out using a GSI 61 audiometer (Grason-Stadler, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) and E.A.RTONE 3 A insert earphones with disposable E.A.RLINK foam ear-tips, and a B71 bone conductor. Air conduction pure tone thresholds were measured at octave and interoctave frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz. Bone conduction pure tone thresholds were measured at octave frequencies from 500 to 4000 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Audiometric Evaluation of SSNHL Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Audiometry was performed using a GSI 61 audiometer (Grason-Stadler, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) and TDH-50p earphones (Telephonics, Farmingdale, NY, USA) in a soundproof booth. The pure-tone average (PTA) was the mean of the thresholds at 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 Hz. SSNHL was defined as hearing loss without an air-bone gap at each tested frequency. The word recognition score (WRS) was also evaluated by calculating the percentage of correctly identified words from a list of phonetically balanced, monosyllabic words. Pre- and post-treatment audiometry refer to hearing tests performed on the day of admission and about 3 months after treatment commenced, respectively. Disease severity was evaluated using the affected ear’s initial PTA and WRS values in addition to associated vertigo. The outcomes of SSNHL treatments were assessed by calculating the hearing gain and WRS change, which were defined as the difference in hearing thresholds and WRSs, respectively, between pre- and post-treatment audiometry. Additionally, Siegel’s criteria (Siegel, 1975 (link)) were used to evaluate the extent of hearing recovery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!