The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statistica v9

Manufactured by StatSoft
Sourced in United States, Poland

Statistica v9.0 is a statistical software package developed by StatSoft. It provides data analysis and visualization tools for researchers, scientists, and professionals. The software offers a range of functionalities, including data management, descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and advanced modeling techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

39 protocols using statistica v9

1

Multivariate Analysis of Biological and Environmental Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Simple regression analysis between biological and environmental factors was carried out in STATISTICA v. 9 (StatSoft). A principal correspondence analysis was conducted using a statistical package—Canoco 4.5 for Windows v. (Ter Braak and Šmilauer 2002 ) and STATISTICA v. 9 (StatSoft).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Phenotypic Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All phenotypic data show Eu frequency calculated from total individuals screened. Total sample size is illustrated on graphs. Significant differences were tested by Fisher's exact test. For the expression data we performed Kruskal–Wallis test. All statistical analyses were implemented in the program Statistica v. 9 (Statsoft).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed the Wilcoxon matched pair test to compare variables at baseline and follow-up. We used the Mann–Whitney test for comparisons between two groups, and the Kruskal–Wallis test for comparisons between multiple groups. For categorical variables, the χ2 test was used. Correlations were calculated using Spearman's rank correlation. Statistical significance was set at the level of p<0.05. Statistical evaluation was performed by statistical software, STATISTICA V.9, StatSoft, USA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Serum Lipids, TSH, and Osteocalcin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data are presented as means ± SD. Normality was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The independent sample t-test or the Mann- Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups, for normally and not normally distributed variables, respectively. Logarithmic (ln) transformation was applied to right-skewed data before correlations analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify relationships between serum lipid parameters and TSH and osteocalcin levels. Statistical analyses were conducted using Statistica v.9 software (StatSoft, USA). The level of significance was set at alpha = 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all studies, data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA) or Statistica v9 (Statsoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) and are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). For comparisons of two groups, Student’s “t” test (two-tailed) was used. Experiments with multiple time points were analyzed using two-way factorial ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post hoc tests for multiple comparisons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pharmacology and Behavioral Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed with Graph-Pad Prism v4 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA) and Statistica v9 (StatSoft, Maisons-Alfort, France). In vitro pharmacology experiments were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA. Behavioral experiments were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons were made using Newman-Keuls or Tukey tests for post hoc analysis. A paired t test was performed to verify that the apparatus used in the conditioned place preference test was unbiased. Place conditioning data were expressed as percentage of time spent in the drug-paired compartment. Four-way ANOVA was performed with gender, genotype and treatment as between-group factors and conditioning (pretest versus test session) as a within-group factor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluation of PAT Content in Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were carried out in triplicate. The obtained results were evaluated with Statistica v.9 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (Table 2). In all of these analyses, we examined the outcome of the mean content of PAT using Student's t-test and p value ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant. In hierarchical clustering calculation, the Ward agglomeration procedure as a grouping method and Euclidean distance as a function of the distance was applied, and results are displayed graphically using a dendrogram (classification tree). Differences in profile among subclusters were verified with the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test at p ≤ 0.05 as significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Interferon Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The levels of IFNs were calculated as a ratio from the standard curve. The distribution of values was not normal (D'Agostino-Pearson omnibus normality test), therefore respective non-parametric tests were used when calculating associations with levels of IFNs. We performed the Wilcoxon matched pair test to compare variables at baseline and follow-up. We used the Mann-Whitney U test for comparisons between the two groups. For categorical variables, the χ2 test was used. Correlations were calculated using Spearman's rank correlation. Statistical significance was set at the level of p<0.05. The statistical evaluation was performed using STATISTICA V.9, StatSoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Treatment Effects via ANOVA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The separate treatment effects were analysed using one-way ANOVA. Significant differences between the treatment means were calculated using the least significant difference (LSD) test at the p < 0.01, p < 0.05 and p < 0.1 levels. The results of the combined applications were evaluated using analysis of variance and regression analysis [28] . As the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) shows whether the model fits the data, only variables for which the Box-Wilson model gave R 2 values higher than 60% are discussed here, since this indicates that changes in these variables could be explained to at least a moderate extent by the model equation. The variance of these variables was determined using the F-test. Variability between the samples was determined by means of principal component analysis (PCA). Statistica v.9 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) software was used for the statistical evaluation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comparative Statistical Analysis of Experimental Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results observed in the four groups at the end of the experiment or % of changes were compared using ANOVA followed by HSD Tukey test. Data were transformed or Kruskal Wallis analysis was applied when necessary. Data from histological analysis were evaluated by Chi-Square test. An alpha value of 0.05 was adopted to reject the null hypothesis. Data analysis and graphs were carried out using the Statistica v.9 software (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!