The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

76 protocols using epon 812

1

Ultrastructural Observation of Cell Monolayers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ultrastructural observation, cell monolayers were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Science, Pennsylvania, USA) and in 0.1% cacodylate buffer (Electron Microscopy Science), postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Science) and then treated with 1% tannic acid (Acros Organics, New Jersey, NJ, USA). Dehydrated in ethanol (Carlo Erba), cells were detached from the plastic dish by a brief treatment in 1% toluene (Carlo Erba). The pelleted monolayer was then incubated in a solution of 50% toluene and 50% EPON 812 (Electron Microscopy Science) and finally processed for conventional EPON 812 embedding. Ultra-thin sections were cut in a Leica Ultracut R ultramicrotome, contrasted for 10 min in 1% acid tannic and successively in 1% lead hydroxide (Società Italiana Chimici, Rome, Italy) and then viewed in a Hitachi 7000 transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ultrastructural Analysis of HaCaT Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HaCaT pMSG E5 and HaCaT pMSG cells treated with Dex and stimulated with KGF for 24 h as above were washed three times in PBS and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 2 h at 4 °C. Samples were postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in veronal acetate buffer (pH 7.4) for 1 h at 25 °C, stained with uranyl acetate (5 mg/ml) for 1 h at 25 °C, dehydrated in acetone and embedded in Epon 812 (EMbed 812, Electron Microscopy Science, Hatfield, PA, USA). Ultrathin sections were examined unstained or poststained with uranyl acetate and lead hydroxide, under a Morgagni 268D transmission electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with a Mega View II charge-coupled device camera (SIS, Soft Imaging System GmbH, Munster, Germany) and analyzed with AnalySIS software (SIS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Mitochondria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 1/2 strength Karnovsky's (2% paraformaldehyde/2.5% glutaraldehyde buffered with 0.2 M cacodylate) and postfixed in 2% OsO4 buffered in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer. After quick dehydration, cells were embedded in Epon 812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences), thin sectioned (70 nm), and stained with uranyl acetate for 2 hours and lead citrate for 5 minutes. The samples were imaged using a JOEL 1230 transmission electron microscope set to 80 kV, and the images were captured using a Gatan digital imaging system. Image analysis was performed using NIH Image J, for mitochondrial size and relative abundance. The latter was calculated by fraction of mitochondria area/cell area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Regenerated Nerve Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 6, 12, and 18 weeks post operatively, the regenerated nerves were harvested after SD rats were sacrificed. Specimens of nerves were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 24 h. They were washed by PBS for three times. Then the nerve segments were fixed by 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated, and embedded in Epon812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, USA) resin. The cross sections were cut at 4 mm thick (Leica EM UC 6 ultramicrotome) and mounted on gelatin pre-coated slides. All samples were evaluated by Tuj1/NF200 and S100/MBP triple immunofluorescent staining. The primary antibodies were anti-Tuj1 (1:100, Abcam, USA), anti-NF200 (1:250, Abcam, USA), anti-S100 beta (1:500, Abcam, USA), and anti-MBP (1:200, Abcam, USA). The slides were observed under an immunofluorescence microscope (Leica, USA). The experiment was repeated for five times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Autophagy Assessment in Primary Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy was performed to assess autophagy of the primary neurons 24 h after treatment with agomiR or antagomiR. Fixed cells were post-fixed in 2% OsO4, dehydrated in graded alcohol and flat embedded in Epon 812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA, USA). Ultra-thin sections (100 nm) were prepared, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined by electron microscopy (Hitachi H7500, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microscopic Evaluation of Pertussis Adherence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy was used to evaluate the adherence of B. pertussis to PHEA and HBE cells. Infected cells on air-liquid interface membranes were fixed serially with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 1% osmium tetroxide and 1% uranyl acetate. Samples were dehydrated serially with increasing concentrations of ethanol (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%) before embedding with EPON812 (Electron microscopy sciences, Washington, PA) following standard procedures (30 (link)). Slice sections 0.5-mm-thick were created with a diamond knife and stained with toluidine blue for light microscopy examination before visualization under a transmission electron microscope (JEOL lOOC-ASID).
Samples to be evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) were dehydrated, embedded, and mounted onto metallic stubs with double-sided carbon tape, sputter coated with a thin layer of metals (gold and palladium) and visualized. Evaluation of B. pertussis-infected cells by light microscopy (LM) required formalin fixation of millicell membranes containing cells followed by embedding in paraffin. Microtome sections from the paraffin block were stained with Giemsa, toluidine blue, or hematoxylin and eosin before visualization under the LM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Platelet Ultrastructure Analysis by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyse platelet ultrastructure, washed platelets were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (16,210, Electron Microscopy Sciences) in 50 mM cacodylate buffer (12,201, pH 7.2; AppliChem). After embedding in epon 812 (14,900, Electron Microscopy Sciences), ultrathin sections were generated and stained with 2% uranyl acetate (22,400, Electron Microscopy Sciences) and lead citrate (17,800, Electron Microscopy Sciences). Samples were visualized with an EM900 transmission electron microscope (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transmission Electron Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission EM was performed as described previously13 (link). In brief, cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (GA) in 50 mM sodium cacodylate buffer (CaCo), supplemented with 2% sucrose, 50 mM KCl, 2.6 mM MgCl2 and 2.6 mM CaCl2, for 30 min at room temperature. After five washes with 50 mM CaCo, samples were incubated with 2% OsO4 in 25 mM CaCo for 40 min on ice, washed three times with EM-grade water and incubated in 0.5% uranyl acetate in water overnight at 4 °C. Samples were rinsed three times with EM-grade water, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (from 40 to 100%) at room temperature, embedded in Epon 812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and polymerized for 2 days at 60 °C. After polymerization, ultrathin sections of 70 nm were obtained by sectioning with an ultramicrotome Leica EM UC6 (Leica Microsystems) and mounted on a slot grid. Sections were counterstained using 3% uranyl acetate in 70% methanol for 5 min and lead citrate (Reynold’s) for 2 min and examined by using a JEOL JEM-1400 (JEOL) operating at 80 kV and equipped with a 4 K TemCam F416 (Tietz Video and Image Processing Systems GmbH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Platelet Ultrastructure Analysis by EM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Washed platelets in a concentration of 3 × 105 platelets/μl were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Science) in cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2, AppliChem). Epon 812 (Electron Microscopy Science) was used to embed platelets. After generation of ultrathin sections, platelets were stained with 2% uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Science) and lead citrate (Electron Microscopy Science). Sections were analyzed on a Zeiss EM900 electron microscope. Platinum replica electron microscopy of spread platelets was performed as previously described (28 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ultrastructural Visualization of PE N/MPL Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the possible PE N/MPL uptake by vaginal cells and highlight the presence of intracellular PE N/MPLs, we performed TEM experiments. VK2 E6/E7 cells, cultured and treated as described above, were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) in PBS for 24 h at 4 °C. After collection, cells were washed three times in PBS, post-fixed for 2 h in 1% OsO4 (Electron Microscopy Sciences), dehydrated in graded acetones and embedded in Epon-812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 48 h at 60 °C. Ultrathin sections (60 nm) were cut with a Reichert ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), mounted on copper grids, counterstained with uranyl-acetate replacement stain and lead citrate (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and finally examined with a Philips CM10 (TEM) and/or a Fei-Philips Morgagni 268D transmission electron microscope (FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). Furthermore, to mimic the formation of a protein corona [9 (link)], we employed PE N/MPLs coated with keratin from human epidermis (Sigma-Aldrich), by incubation for 24 h at 4 °C prior to the treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!