The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti il 10 jes5 16e3

1

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis of CD4+ T Cell Phenotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained with anti-CD4 (RM4-5), anti-CD19 (1D3), anti-CD25 (IL-2Rα, p55), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-Thy1.1 (HIS51), anti-IL-17A (eBio17B7), anti-IFNγ (XMG1.2), anti-MHCII (M5/114.15.2), anti-B7-H1 (MIH5) and anti-IL10 (JES5-16E3) (all Abs from eBioscience). Cells were acquired using a FACS LSR II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using a FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR). To measure the frequency of cytokine producing CD4 T cells, cells were stimulated with PMA (10 ng/ml) and Ionomycin (1 µM) for 4 hrs in the presence of 2 µM Monensin (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) during the last 2 hrs. Cells were immediately fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized, and stained with fluorescence conjugated antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Surface Marker Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell surface marker analysis, cells were stained with antibodies in PBS containing 0.1% (wt/vol) BSA and 0.1% NaN3. The following mAbs were used in the present study: anti-CD11b (M1/70; eBiosciences, Ben Lomond, CA, USA), anti-Gr1 (RB6-8C5; eBiosciences), anti-CD45 (TU116; BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-GR (EPR4595; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-HIF1α (IC1935P; R&D system, Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti-human HLADR (L243; Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-human CD33 (P67.0; Biolegend) and anti-human CD11b (ICRF44; Biolegend).
Intracellular staining was analysed by FCM as described.18 (link) Cells isolated from different organs were re-stimulated with LPS (L2630; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) for CD11b+Gr1+ cell analysis for 5 h, and GolgiStop (554724; BD Bioscience) was added for the last 2 h. After surface staining and washing, the cells were immediately fixed with cytofix/cytoperm solution (554714; BD Biosciences) and were stained with anti-TNFα (MP6-XT22; eBiosciences) and anti-IL-10 (JES5-16E3; eBiosciences). For transcriptional factor analysis, after surface staining, the cells were fixed with fixation/permeabilization buffer (00-5523; eBioscience) and stained with anti-GR and anti-HIF1α. FCM data were acquired on a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, San Diego, CA, USA), and data were analysed with FlowJo (TreeStar, San Carlos, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immune Cell Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions were isolated from spleen, PeC and MLN tissues. For detection of intracellular IL-10 in B cells, isolated cells were resuspended and incubated for 5h with LPS (10 μg/ml, Sigma), phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 50 ng/ml, Sigma), ionomycin (500 ng/ml, Sigma), and brefeldin A (3 μg/ml, eBioscience). To detect intracellular Foxp3 in T cells, the isolated cells were resuspended and exposed to the same agents, except LPS, for 4 h. Before staining for cell surface makers, cells were blocked with anti-CD16/CD32 Fc-block (2.4G2, BD Biosciences). Cells were fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences) and then were stained with anti-IL-10 (JES5-16E3, eBioscience) and Foxp3 (FJK-16s, eBioscience). Abs against mouse surface proteins were: CD4 (GK1.5), CD5 (53-7.3), CD19 (eBio1D3), CD25 (PC61.5), and B220 (RA3-6B2), all from eBioscience Inc. (San Diego, CA). Cells were analyzed with FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) and FlowJo version 10 software (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

B cell Stimulation and IL-10 Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleen and PeC CD19+ B cells (3 × 106 cells/well) stimulated for 5 or 48 h with LPS (10 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The B cells were incubated with LPS alone or with JQ1 (0, 20, 50, and 100 nM) for 5 h or indicated times in figure legends, and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 50 ng/ml, Sigma-Aldrich), ionomycin (500 ng/ml, Sigma-Aldrich), and Monensin (2 μM, eBioscience, San Diego, CA) were added during last 5 h. Prior to surface staining, Fcγ receptors were blocked with anti-CD16/CD32 monoclonal antibodies (2.4G2, BD Biosciences). Cells were fixed and permeabilized with a Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (eBioscience) and then were stained with anti-IL-10 (JES5-16E3, eBioscience) (46 (link)). The antibodies against surface proteins were as follows: CD1d (1B1), CD5 (53-7.3), CD11b (M1/70), CD19 (eBio1D3), CD21/CD35 (eBioBD9), CD23 (B3B4), CD40 (HM40-3), CD86 (GL1), B220 (RA3-6B2), IgM (eB121-15F9), IgD (11 (link)–26 (link)), MHCII (M5/114.15.2), all purchased from eBioscience. Cells were analyzed with FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and FlowJo V10 software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR). The gate strategy for IL-10-producing B cells was illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cytokine Analysis of CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspension of PECs and LNs were stained with anti-CD45 (30-F11: eBioscience; San Diego, CA), anti-CD4 (RM4–5: Biolegend; San Diego, CA), and anti-TCRβ (H57–597: eBioscience) antibodies. Subsequently, the cells were stimulated with cell stimulation cocktail (eBioscience) and monensin (eBioscience) for 5 hours. After stimulation, the cells were stained with Ghost Dye UV450 (TONBO) to identify dead cells. After fixation and permeabilization by IC Fixation Buffer (eBioscience), intracellular cytokines were stained by anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2: Biolegend), and anti-IL-10 (JES5–16E3: eBioscience) antibodies. Cytokine+ CD4+ T cells numbers were analyzed by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!