The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Snap surface 649

Manufactured by New England Biolabs
Sourced in United Kingdom

SNAP-Surface 649 is a fluorescent labeling reagent designed for the in vitro and in vivo labeling of SNAP-tag fusion proteins. It provides a simple, one-step method for covalently attaching a red-fluorescent dye to SNAP-tag proteins.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using snap surface 649

1

Purification and Labeling of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were expressed from the pMal-c2 vector (NEB), except for full length hnRNPA1 and related mutants, which were cloned into a modified pet11a vector (Novagen)(see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) and purified with Ni-NTA and/or amylose resin. SNAP-PTB-IDRs were further purified through a Superdex200 column (GE Healthcare). Proteins were fluorescently-labeled with SNAP-Surface 488 or SNAP-Surface 649 (NEB) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Amino acid residues of all proteins and nucleotide sequences of all RNAs are listed in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

TR-FRET Assay for SNAP-Tagged GLP-1R and GIPR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) assay was performed as previously described (24 ). INS-1 832/3 SNAP-GLP-1R or SNAP-GIPR cells were labeled in suspension with 40 nM SNAP-Lumi4-Tb and 1 mM SNAP-Surface 649 (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK) for 1 hour at room temperature in complete medium. After washing, cells were resuspended in HBSS, and TR-FRET was monitored before and after addition of 100 nM GLP-1, GIP, or a mixture of GLP-1 and GIP at 37 °C in a Spectramax i3x plate reader in homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) mode. TR-FRET was quantified as the ratio of fluorescent signal at 665 nm to that at 616 nm, after subtraction of background signal at each wavelength.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Liquid Droplet Aggregation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formation of microscopic aggregates was assayed for the formation of liquid droplets (Lin et al., 2015 (link)). Proteins were fluorescently labeled with SNAP-Surface 549 or SNAP-Surface 649 (NEB) at 37 °C for 30 min in dark. Puri fied bacterial proteins with 2% of the protein fluorescently labeled were diluted in 37.5 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, and 1mM DTT. Reactions were performed in 96-well glass bottom plates (MatTek) coated with 3% BSA for 15 minutes and sealed with PCR plate film (USA scientific) to minimize evaporation. Images were acquired on an LSM 510 Meta Confocal Microscope (Zeiss) or an Eclipse TE2000 epifluorescence microscope (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

GLP-1R Clustering Dynamics Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assay was performed as previously described [20] (link). Cells were dual labelled with SNAP-Lumi4-Tb (40 nM) and 500 nM SNAP-Surface-649 (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK) for 30 min at 37 °C, in complete medium. After washing, labelled cells were resuspended in HBSS. TR-FRET signals at baseline and serially after agonist addition were recorded at 37 °C using a Spectramax i3x plate reader with HTRF module. GLP-1R clustering was quantified as the ratio of the fluorescence signal at 665 nm to that at 616 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SNAP-GLP-1R Trafficking and Lysosomal Colocalization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
INS-1 832/3 EV and g1-2 cells transiently expressing the SNAP-GLP-1R were labeled at 37°C with 1 μM SNAP-Surface 649 fluorescent substrate (S9159S, New England Biolabs) in full medium before treatment with 100 nM exendin-4 or vehicle for 3 hours. Five minutes before the end of the latter incubation period, 1 μM LysoTracker Red DND-99 (L7528, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added. The cells were washed in PBS and fixed in 4% PFA, mounted in ProLong Diamond antifade reagent with 4´,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Life Technologies), and imaged by confocal microscopy with an Imperial College London NHLI FILM Zeiss LSM-780 inverted confocal laser-scanning microscope and a 63×/1.4 numerical aperture oil immersion objective equipped with Zen software (ZEN 2.3 SP1, black, 64-bit, Carl Zeiss). Images were analyzed using ImageJ v1.53c. The Coloc 2 plugin was used for colocalization analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Labeling CST Complex with SNAP-surface-649

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We incubated 5 μM SNAP-CST with 10 μM SNAP-surface-649 (New England Biolabs) in 50 μL buffer C (35 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 0.01% Igepal, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) for 16 h at 4 °C. Then we used an Amicon Ultra-4 10K centrifugal tube (Millipore) to remove the excess fluorescent dye and to concentrate the labeled CST complex. The labeled CST complex was divided into small aliquots and stored at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SNAP-tag Protein Labeling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two different fluorescent probes, SNAP-Surface 649 (red) and SNAP-Surface Alexa Fluor 488 (green; New England Biolabs), were used to label SNAP-α. All labeling reactions were carried out using a twofold molar excess of dye with 27 μM SNAP-α in 1 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 100 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol (buffer Fα) for 2 hr at 23°C, followed by 6°C overnight with gentle rotation. Following the coupling, the reaction mixture was supplemented with 1 mM EDTA and excess dye was removed by gel filtration at 1 ml/min through a column (1.5 × 10 cm) of Sephadex G-25 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) in buffer Fα+1 mM EDTA. Fractions containing the labeled SNAP-α were pooled and dialysed against 2 l of buffer Eα, frozen in liquid N2 and stored in aliquots at –80°C. The degree of labeling was measured to be 90% for SNAP-α649 and 83% for SNAP-α488 by UV/vis spectrophotometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nanobody-SNAP Fusion Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
~2×105 HEK293T cells were seeded in 6-well plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog # 140675) in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, and incubated under 5% CO2 at 37°C for overnight. Cells in a 1.5-mL medium were transiently transfected with plasmids (2.5 μg each) encoding nanobody–SNAP-tag fusions using lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After 36-h incubation, the medium was removed and cells were washed with 1× PBS twice, dissociated from the plate by digestion with a 1× Trypsin-EDTA Solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog # R001100), and collected in 15-mL conical tubes. Cells were washed with 1 mL 1× PBS and re-suspended in 250 μL ice cold 1× PBS for sonication. After centrifugation at 20,000g for 10 min, ~50 μL supernatants were incubated with 1 μM (final concentration) SNAP-Surface 649 (New England Biolabs, catalog # S9159S) for 1 h at r.t. to label SNAP-tagged proteins. Labelled samples were boiled for 10 min at 95°C in an SDS sample loading buffer before loaded onto an SDS-PAGE gel. The gel was scanned by an Odyssey CLx imaging system (Li-cor Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Calcium-Sensing Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calcium chloride (Cat. 10043-52-4), magnesium chloride (Cat. 7786-30-3), GABA (Cat. A2129), L-glutamate (Cat. 56-86-0), L-alanine (Cat. 56-41-7), L-trytophan (Cat. 73-22-3), neomycin (Cat. 1405-10-3) and spermine (Cat. 71-44-3) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). NPS R-568 (Cat. 3815) and AC265347 (Cat. 6165) were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). NPS 2143 (Cat. ab145050) was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Etelcalcetide (Cat. HY-P1955A) was from MedChemExpress (NJ, USA). Lipofectamine 2000 (Cat. 11668019) and Fluo4-AM (Cat. M14206) were supplied by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). SNAP-Surface 649 (Cat. S9159S) was from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA). IP-One Gq kit (Cat. 62IPAPEB), BRET substrate coelenterazine h (Cat. S2001) and furimazine (Cat. N1120) were from Revvity (Codolet, France) and Promega (Madison, WI, USA), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Purification and Labeling of Membrane Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-FLAG-M2 affinity agarose gel and 3X FLAG peptide were obtained from Sigma Aldrich, n-dodecyl β-d-maltoside (DDM) was from Anatrace, protease inhibitor cocktail Set V was from Calbiochem/EMD Millipore Corp, Transporter 5™ transfection reagent (PEI MAX) was from Polysciences Inc., Antibiotic–Antimycotic (100X, containing 10,000 units penicillin, 10,000 μg/ml streptomycin and 25 μg/ml amphotericin) was from Gibco, and spin columns (product number 69705) were from Pierce Biotechnology. HEK293S GnTI- cells were a kind gift of the Meyerson laboratory (Weill Cornell Medical College). NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Cloning Kit, Phusion polymerase, Dpn1 and T4 DNA ligase were from New England Biolabs, and primers were obtained from IDT. Phospholipids (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1'-rac-glycerol)(POPG) and 1-palmitoyl-2-{6-[(7-nitro-2–1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)amino]hexanoyl}-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (NBD-PC)) were obtained as stock solutions in chloroform from Avanti Polar Lipids. Sodium dithionite was from Sigma. SNAP-Surface 549 and SNAP-Surface 649 were from New England Biolabs. Bio-Beads SM2 resin was from Bio-Rad Laboratories; the resin was washed twice with methanol (25 ml per g of resin), twice with water and once with buffer (as indicated) prior to use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!