The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistic for windows version 22

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics for Windows version 22.0 is a software application designed for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. The core function of this software is to enable users to explore, analyze, and present data effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

7 protocols using spss statistic for windows version 22

1

Exploratory Factor Analysis for Model Fit

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) can be used to achieve the appropriate model if, after performing CFA, no fitness is observed between various developed models and the data.
EFA examines the internal consistency of a large number of variables and finally categorizes and explains them as a few general factors. Therefore, the purpose of performing EFA is to obtain dimensions that are latent in a wide range of variables but are not easily visible.[35 ] In this study, due to the model's not being fit, the EFA was performed using IBM SPSS statistic for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonak, NY: IBM Crop Data Analysis software (IBM).
EFA was performed to determine the number of factors. To this end, a factor loading above 0.4 was set for keeping the items. Then, the obtained factor structure was examined through Velicer's minimum average partial (MAP) test combined with the parallel analysis to approve the number of factors obtained in the PTGI.
To identify factors, the eigenvalues were calculated and the scree plot was used. In addition, orthogonal rotation was applied and the varimax approach was used, in which maximum variance between the factors is produced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ANOVA Statistical Analysis of Experimental Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine if there were significant differences among groups for each day separately. If the P value for an ANOVA table was less than or equal to 0.05, the difference between treatment groups was evaluated using a multiple comparison test. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistic for Windows version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) (https://www.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/register/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ANOVA Analysis of Treatment Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine if there were significant differences among groups for each day separately. If the p-value for an ANOVA table was less than or equal to 0.05, the difference between treatment groups was evaluated using a multiple comparison test. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistic for Windows version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) (https://www.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/register/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparing Treatment Outcomes Using SPSS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The data was analyzed by IBM SPSS Statistic for Windows version 22.0. Welch ANOVA and Games-Howell post hoc multiple comparisons tests were used to analyze the difference among groups. All
p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Survival Analysis of Integrated Care

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were done to compare the time to coverage pre- and post-integration. Bivariate-statistical analyses were utilized to compare the pre- vs. post-integration, early vs. late, and primary vs. secondary groups against demographic, medical history, treatment, and complication variables. Student’s t-test was used for normal, continuous variables, and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normal, continuous variables. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical variables as appropriate. Tests were performed using two sided p-values at alpha = 0.05. All statistical tests were performed using a standard software package (IBM SPSS Statistic for Windows, Version 22.0, Armonk, NY). The STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) statement was used as a guideline for reporting this paper.[20 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Systematic Review of Injury Diagnostic Tests

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Abstracted data was used to recreate 2×2 tables and calculate SN, SP, +LR, and −LR. If studies used 3×2 tables, including a third “equivocal” result, 2×2 tables were created by conservatively adding the equivocal results with a true injury to the FN cell and those without injury into the FP cell.20 (link) We also analyzed thoracic or lumbar injury subgroups. Data was preferentially abstracted based on the presence of injuries using individual patients as the population. Results presenting individual vertebrae as the population (e.g. fractured vs. unfractured vertebrae), were analyzed separately. If studies used multiple observers and calculated SN and SP based on mean averages, these values were used to recreate 2×2 tables. When greater than one study assessed the same index test, we computed meta-analysis estimates using MetaDiSc (Hospital Univeritario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain) and forest tree plots for SN, SP, +LR, and −LR using a random-effects model.21 (link) Pretest probability (prevalence) was estimated using a weighted average. The DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used to calculate interstudy heterogeneity amongst pooled SN and SP using the index of inconsistency (I2). 22 (link),23 (link) QUADAS-2 between-rater agreement was quantified using Cohen’s kappa (κ) with IBM SPSS Statistic for Windows, Version 22.0 (Armonk, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Study Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistic was used to report the study variables. Medians (interquartile range) and proportions were generated for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square (χ2) test or Fisher’s exact test. The T Student’s test or the Mann–Whitney’s test were used to compare continuous variables. Statistical tests were 2-tailed. Significance for all statistic tests was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistic for Windows, version 22.0, Armonk, NY: IBM corp.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!