The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti halotag monoclonal antibody

Manufactured by Promega
Sourced in United States

The Anti-HaloTag monoclonal antibody is a laboratory tool that specifically recognizes the HaloTag protein. The HaloTag is a protein fusion tag used to study protein localization, interaction, and function in living cells. The Anti-HaloTag monoclonal antibody can be used to detect the presence and distribution of HaloTag-labeled proteins in various experimental applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using anti halotag monoclonal antibody

1

Transcription Factor Binding Site Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Predicted open reading frames for each transcription factor were amplified from cDNA generated using RNA to cDNA EcoDry premix (Clontech). Amplified transcription factor sequences were inserted into an expression vector containing T7 and SP6 promoters upstream of HALO tag as previously described (30 (link)). In vitro transcription and translation of transcription factors was performed using Promega TnT T7 Rabbit Reticulocyte Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System by incubating 1 μg of plasmid DNA with 60 μL of TnT Master Mix and 1.5 μL of 1 mM methionine overnight at room temperature. Expression was verified using Western blot analysis with Promega Anti-HaloTag monoclonal antibody. Single DAP-seq libraries were generated once for each transcription factor, tested, and sequenced once with Illumina MiSeq 2 × 150-bp runs.
Filtered reads were aligned to the N. crassa OR74A genome (v12) using Bowtie2 v2.3.2 (70 (link)). Peak calling was performed using MACS2 v2.1.1 (74 (link)) with P value cutoff at 0.001 and utilizing negative control library alignments. Peaks within 3,000 bp upstream of translation start sites were selected for and annotated using a custom Python script. The same Python script was used for reanalysis of ChIP-seq peaks dataset from Craig et al. (10 (link)) for DAP-seq/ChIP-seq comparisons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

MAPK4-KO Cell Lysis and Immunoblotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 1 × 106 cells of WT, MAPK4-KO, or transfected MAPK4-KO HCT-8 cells were lysed in 100 mL of ice-cold lysis buffer (0.5% Nonidet P-40, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5) containing 1/100 concentration of protease inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque) for 30 min. Proteins in cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE using E-R520L e-PAGEL (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan), transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon-P; Millipore), and blocked with 5% dry skim milk powder in TBS-T buffer (Nacalai Tesque) at room temperature for more than 1 h. The membrane was incubated overnight at 4 ℃ with the anti-HaloTag monoclonal antibody (Promega corporation; 1:1000 dilution) or the anti-beta Actin antibody (66009-1-Ig; Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA; 1:1000 dilution), washed three times for five minutes each with TBS-T buffer, and incubated in TBS-T buffer with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat α-mouse IgG antibody (PIERCE; 1:5000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was washed three times for five minutes each with TBS-T buffer and reacted with the Pierce Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Scientific) to generate chemiluminescence. The signal was detected and analyzed by BioRad ChemiDoc Touch imaging system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blotting of Halotag Pulldowns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting from luciferase assay samples was performed as previously described (Weidmann and Goldstrohm 2012 (link)). For Western blotting of Halotag pulldowns, input samples were diluted 10-fold in elution buffer and were separated along with TEV elutions via SDS-polyacrylamide (12%) gel electrophoresis, and proteins were transferred onto Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore). All membranes were probed with either V5 monoclonal antibody (Invitrogen), c-myc (9E10) antibody (provided by Dr. Eric Wagner), anti-Halotag monoclonal antibody (Promega), or monoclonal anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma). Secondary detection was performed using horseradish peroxidase conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Thermo Scientific). Signals were detected using Immobilon Western chemiluminescent substrate (Millipore) and autoradiography film.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibody sources and materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rabbit polyclonal to Myc antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA), monoclonal anti-Flag M2 antibody was from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA), and Living Colore A.V. monoclonal anti-GFP antibody was from Clontech (Mountain View, CA, USA). Anti-Halo Tag monoclonal antibody and HaloTag TMR Ligand were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). Cell-culture supplies were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. (Rockville, MD). Subcloning reagents, restriction enzymes and competent cells were obtained from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA), GIBCO BRL (Gaithersburg, MD), New England BioLabs (Beverly, MA), and Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

VEGF-A Signaling Pathway Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant human VEGF-A was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). MLN4924 was from Funakoshi Chemical Co. (Tokyo, Japan). Anti-flk1/VEGFR2 (C-1158: sc-504) and anti-SPOP (C-14: sc-66649) antibody were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-CUL3 (Clone CUL3-9, Catalog# SAB4200180), mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody (clone AC-15) and anti–β-tubulin antibody (clone JDR.3B8) were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Anti–phospho-VEGFR2 (Tyr1175)(19A10; #2478), anti–phospho-Akt (Ser473; #9270), anti–Akt (#9272), anti–phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204; #9101), anti–Erk (p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2); #9102), anti–DAXX (25C12; #4533), anti–VEGF receptor1 (#2893) and anti–Neuropilin1 (D62C6) antibody were from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Anti-HaloTag monoclonal antibody (G9211) was from Promega (Madison, WI). The Wako silver staining kit was obtained from Wako Biochemicals (Osaka, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detecting JAK/STAT Pathway Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zirconia balls were added to the proteins extracted from the liver of P0 newborns. Then, the proteins were dissolved in 1 ml sample buffer (NuPAGE LDS sample buffer 250μL, sample reducing agent 100μL, 25×protease inhibiter 40μL, and water 610μL) and crushed. After centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, the supernatant of each sample was subjected to SDS-PAGE. Strips of membrane were incubated with anti-p-JAK1 (Tyr1021), anti-JAK1 (ab125051; Abcam), anti-p-STAT1 (Tyr701), anti-STAT1 (ab99415; Abcam), anti-p-STAT3 (Tyr705), anti-STAT3 (SAB4300708, Sigma Aldrich), anti-p-STAT5 (Tyr694), anti-STAT5 (ab16276; Abcam), anti-p-STAT6 (Tyr641), anti-STAT6 (ab32520; Abcam) or anti-GAPDH (ab9485; Abcam) antibodies. The antibody–antigen complexes were detected with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) at a dilution of 1:1,000, followed by detection with enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting substrate (GE Healthcare BioSciences, Little Chalfont, UK), as described by the manufacturer. n=3. Each experiment was performed three times. For HEK293 cell lysates, additional anti-HaloTag monoclonal antibody (G9211; Promega Corporation, WI) and anti-JAK1 rabbit monoclonal antibody (#3344; Cell Signaling Technology, MA) were used as the primary antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimized Halo-tagged Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The full-length PDF2 and pdf2 ΔST cDNAs were transferred from pENTR/D-TOPO into destination vector pIX-HALO (CD3-1742, ABRC) using Gateway LR Clonase II Enzyme mix (ThermoFisher Scientific). The K107E and K107T mutations were generated using the Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (E0552S, New England Biolabs) with primers listed in Supplemental Table 3 in pENTR/D-TOPO followed by transfer to pIX-HALO.
The Halo fusion proteins were produced using 1.2 µg plasmid DNA of the respective pIX-HALO construct in a volume of 15 µl using the TNT SP6 High-Yield Wheat Germ Protein Expression System (L3260, Promega). Protein expression was confirmed by Western blot with Anti-Halo Tag monoclonal antibody (1:2000) (G9211, Promega).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!