The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jem 3200fs

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan

The JEM-3200FS is a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) produced by JEOL. It is designed to provide high-resolution imaging and analysis of a wide range of samples. The JEM-3200FS features a cold field emission gun, which enables it to achieve high resolution and low-voltage imaging. The microscope is equipped with various detectors, including a secondary electron detector, a backscattered electron detector, and an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer, allowing for comprehensive characterization of samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using jem 3200fs

1

Nanoparticle Characterization by TEM and STEM-EDX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All nanoparticles were characterized on JEOL JEM 1010 TEM operating at 80 keV and images collected with a ROM CCD camera. TEM samples were drop-casted onto the TEM grid after the entire sample was washed 2–3 times as described below. Additional characterization with STEM-EDX was completed with JEOL JEM 3200FS operating at 300 keV, images taken with Gatan 4k × 4k Ultrascan 4000 camera and the EDX mapping was obtained using an Oxford INCA dispersive X-ray system interfaced with the JEOL JEM 3200FS. High angle annular dark field (HAADF)-STEM images were collected with an aberration corrected Nion UltraSTEM 100 (operating at 100 kV). The TEM samples were prepared as describe above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of MnO2 Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of MnO2 nanomaterials were observed by high-resolution field emission transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEM-3200FS, JEOL, Japan). The thickness of MNS was measured by atom force microscope (AFM) (MultiMode 8, Bruker, Germany). X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of MNS was detected by X-ray diffractometer (D8 Advance, Bruker, Germany). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and Zeta potential was measured on Zetasizer Nano-ZS90 (Malven, England). Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were collected on a FT-IR spectrometer (Spectrum Two, PerkinElmer, USA). UV/Vis absorption spectra were measured on a Cary 60 UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The Mn element concentration of MNS was quantified by an inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) (JY 2000-2, Horiba, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of FePS Nanosheets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
JEM-3200FS (JEOL, Japan) was used to take the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images at 200 kV. Size distribution and zeta potential were determined using Zetasizer 3000 HAS (Malvern Ltd., UK). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was performed on Bruker Multimode 8 with the drop-cast flakes on a Si/SiO2 substrate. XRD (X-ray diffraction) analysis was performed by the SmartLab X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan). The UV-Vis-NIR absorption were carried out by U-3900 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Japan). The concentration of FePS NSs was measured with ICP-OES (7000DV, PerkinElmer, USA). Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra were detected by MDTC-EQ-M13-01 (Thermo, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy of LR-LMO and LMO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images of LR-LMO and LMO were obtained from a FEI Titan 80-300ST (with a spherical and chromatic aberration imaging corrector and a JEM-3200FS, JEOL), an aberration-corrected STEM (JEOL ARM 200CF) and an Argonne Chromatic Aberration-corrected TEM (ACAT) (an FEI Titan 80-300ST with an image aberration corrector to compensate for both spherical and chromatic aberrations) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing Ginseng and Arabidopsis Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To visualize ginseng and Arabidopsis exosomes, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used. Isolated exosome samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for one hour, and 5 μL of fixed samples were placed on the carbon support film of a nickel grid and incubated to allow the sample to be adsorbed to the grid. Grids were washed with 60 μL of 2% uranyl acetate. TEM observation was performed using a JEM-2100F Field Emission Transmission Electron Microscope (JEOL Ltd., Japan) at 200 kV and images were captured using an UltraScan 4000 CCD camera (Gatan Inc. USA.). For cryo-transmission electron microscopy observation (Cryo-TEM), 5 μL of the isolated exosome samples were loaded onto copper Quantifoil grids with a 1.2 μm diameter hole and an inter-hole distance of 1.3 μm (Electron Microscopy Sciences, USA). Prior to freezing, the grids were glow discharged for 45 sec on each side. Grids were frozen using a Vitrobot, and the frozen samples were observed using the JEM 3200FS (JEOL Ltd., Japan) transmission electron microscope at 120 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cryogenic STEM Imaging and EDS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Hitachi HD-2300A equipped with Thermo Scientific NORAN System 7 EDS detectors was operated at 200 kV for STEM imaging in ADF, HAADF, BF, and SE modes as well as for EDS analysis. A JEOL JEM-3200FS was operated at 300 kV for HRTEM. In both microscopes, Gatan 626 single tilt liquid nitrogen cryo transfer holders were used to support the samples. The samples were inserted into the microscope column and then cooled down to cryogenic conditions under vacuum by liquid nitrogen before electron irradiation. In situ (HA)ADF movies were recorded at a resolution of 512 px × 512 px, a scan area of 51.79 nm × 51.79 nm, and pixel dwell times of 20 μs (Movie S1) or 7.5 μs (Movie S2). The probe current was 0.168 nA. EDS analysis was performed after fixing the area of interest by scanning the area using a lower flux electron beam until the nanoparticles did not grow further. EDS of individual nanoparticles was performed with manual drift correction based on the HAADF signal. EDS quantification was performed with the Thermo Scientific NSS software after background removal and matrix correction by the Proza method (Phi-Rho-Z). A Gatan K2 Summit direct electron detector was used for HRTEM imaging at a resolution of 3710 px × 3838 px (pixel size is 0.013 nm for the imaging conditions used).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Negative staining of recombinant hPER2c

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Elution fractions of the recombinant hPER2c were diluted to 0.05mg/ml using the same buffer as in SEC prior to negative staining. For each diluted elution, 4μl of sample was added onto an ultrathin carbon film on Lacey 400 mesh grid (Ted Pella Inc., cat #1824), which was glow discharged using Emitech K950 carbon coater with K350 glow discharge unit for 1.5min with a current of 15mA. The sample was incubated on the grid for 3min while the grid rested about 2.5cm above ice. The excess sample was then blotted using filter paper and stained with 4% Thulium Acetate (Sigma-Aldrich, cat # 367702) for 1.5 mins. The stained sample was then imaged at 300 kV with a 120,000x nominal magnification (calibrated as 137,800x) on a JEOL JEM-3200FS transmission electron microscope equipped with a field emission gun and an in-column omega filter. The micrographs were recorded on a Gatan 4k x 4k UltraScan US4000 CCD camera with defocus values at approximately 2μm. Such TEM analysis were also carried out on the sample treated with DTT for 36hrs for the purpose of visualizing the effects of a reducing environment on the oligomerization of hPER2c.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Structural Analysis of Tungsten Oxide Nanowires and WS2 Nanotubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structures and elemental compositions of the tungsten oxide nanowires and the as-prepared small-diameter WS2 nanotubes were evaluated by TEM with EDS (JEM-3200FS, JEM2100F, and JEM2010F, JEOL Ltd.), FESEM (JSM-7100F JEOL Ltd.), XRD (Rigaku SmartLab) with Cu Kα1 (1.5406 Å) radiation, XPS (JPS-9010, JEOL Ltd.) and Raman spectroscopy (532 nm excitation, WItec).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of 2D Nanosheets and Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The topographies and thicknesses of exfoliated nanosheets (InSe, graphene, h-BN) and films of PMMA and Al2O3 were identified by an optical microscope (Nikon Y-IDP) and AFM (Dimension ICON system, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Raman and PL spectra of InSe nanosheets were collected by using a WITec Alpha 300R (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) confocal microscope spectrometer with an excitation laser of 532 nm. TEM sample was prepared by using the focused ion beam (FIB) system (FEI, Scios, Hopewell Township, NJ, USA). To protect the selected region from ion damage, a layer of 500 nm Pt and another layer of 2 μm Pt were successively deposited on the h-BN/InSe/h-BN heterostructure before FIB milling. The prepared cross-sectional slice was then transferred and attached to a TEM grid. TEM and EDS mapping images were performed on a JEOL JEM-3200FS operated at an accelerating voltage of 300 kV and equipped with an EDS detector.
The electrical properties of the InSe devices were measured in a probe station (Lakeshore, TTPX, Thebarton, Australia) in vacuum, using a Keithley (4200-SCS, Cleveland, OH, USA) semiconductor parameter analyzer. Photo-response was triggered by a supercontinuum white-light laser source (SC400-8, Fianium Ltd., Southampton, UK) coupled with a monochromator. The laser intensity was measured with a commercial Thorlabs power meter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of Synthesized Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The micro-structural properties and morphologies of the synthesized products were observed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/MAX-Ultima, Cu Kα source, 2° min−1 scanning rate and the scanning angle from 10° to 80° as well as the power was 40 kV and 40 mA, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), scanning electron microscopy (SEM, ZEISS Gemini 500, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-3200FS, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Besides, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis were carried out using XPS, ESCALAB 250XI, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA and BET, ASAP2010C instrument, Norcross GA, USA, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!