The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

55 protocols using ix83 fluorescence microscope

1

VEGF-Induced HUVEC Proliferation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell proliferation was determined using the Edu Cell Proliferation kit (cat. no. C10339; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Following 12 h serum starvation, HUVECs were incubated with Edu-labeling mixture (10 µM) in combination with recombinant human VEGFA-165 (50 ng/ml; cat. no. 100-20; PeproTech, Inc.) for 12 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Images (four pictures of each group) were captured by an Olympus IX83 fluorescence microscope (Olympus Corporation) at 10× magnification. The rate of cell proliferation was calculated using the following formula: Number of Edu+ cells/total number of cells in each field.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detecting DNA Double-Strand Breaks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect the level of DNA double‐strand breaks, the cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 15 minutes after radiation or siRNA transfection treatment. Then the cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X‐100 at room temperature for 30 minutes, blocked with 1% BSA in PBST (0.1% Triton X‐100) at room temperature for 1 hour. The cells were then incubated with primary anti‐γ‐H2AX antibody diluted in PBST containing 1% BSA overnight at 4°C. The dishes were then washed three times with PBST for 15 minutes. AlexaFlour‐594 conjugated goat anti‐rabbit IgG secondary antibody was used to incubate samples at room temperature for 2 hours. After wash with PBST, cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Images were captured under Olympus IX83 fluorescence microscope. Fluorescence intensity was analysed with ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Counting Methodology for Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were processed in triplicate, and two independent experiments were performed for each scenario. Cells in up to five chamber slides were counted using the Olympus Ix83 fluorescence microscope at 40× or 63× magnification; more than 250 cells were counted for each chamber slide. Statistical analysis was performed using StatView 5.0 and GraphPad Prism software. The absolute values obtained were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey test for multiple comparisons. Graphs show the averages obtained from the analyzed values for each group. All values are expressed as means ± SE. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Subcellular Localization of GFP-TafE in Mammalian and Yeast Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the subcellular localization in mammalian cells, GFP-TafE was expressed in HeLa cells by transfection using Lipofectamine 3000 (catalog number L3000150; Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (1:5,000) (catalog number H3570; Invitrogen) to label the nuclei. Fluorescence images of the samples were acquired using an Olympus IX-83 fluorescence microscope.
To assess its distribution in yeast, the gfp-tafEH545A fusion protein gene was inserted into p425GPD (60 (link)), and the resulting plasmid was introduced into yeast strain W303. Amounts of 333 μL of cells of the strain harboring the plasmid were mixed with 666 μL of ethanol, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature (25°C) for 1 h. The yeast cells were spun down, and the pellet was suspended with PBS. After staining with Hoechst 33342 (1:2,000), samples were observed under a fluorescence microscope for image acquisition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microscopic Analysis of Cell Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscopy of the constructs was performed on days 1, 2, 4, 7 and 14 after printing using an Olympus IX83 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Images were taken, merged, and quantified using the Olympus CellSens Dimension software (version 2.2, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan, 2009).
For quantification of cell survival on day 1, we counted the cells in five equal ROIs (regions of interest) in three pictures per sample and calculated the mean cell number per mm2.
Cell proliferation from day 4 to 14 was quantified via the mean gray value intensity of at least three raw images per condition. Respective background fluorescence was deducted by subtraction of the mean background gray value of three ROIs per image, and different exposure times were normalized based on the exposure time of 400 ms with 2fold amplification. The mean gray value intensity of the cells per image was calculated using formula 1:

Protrusions were analyzed with ImageJ by measuring the maximal length of three cells per time point from the center of the cell body to the utmost point of its fluorescence signal.
Graphs were designed using GraphPad Prism 8 (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Brightness, contrast and intensity of the depicted images were edited with CorelDraw 2017 (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Canada) for better perceptibility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optimizing Macrophage Phagocytosis of Fluorescent Beads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The uptake of fluorescent beads was optimized using RAW 264.7 macrophages and 1 μm particle size fluorescent beads (yellow-green fluorescence, Cat# L4655, Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Macrophages were labeled with PKH26 (red fluorescence, Cat# MINI26-1KT, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and were seeded in 4-well glass chamber slides for 24 h. Five microliters of the bead solution were opsonized by resuspending with 5 mL of 50% FBS/PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) solution and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After opsonization, beads were seeded at increasing cell to bead concentrations [No beads (control), 1:12, 1:24 1:72, 1:150] and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Following engulfment, cells were washed 3 times with PBS to remove unengulfed beads. For fluorescence microscopy, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed with PBS, and mounted for fluorescence microscopy (Olympus IX83 fluorescence microscope). After optimization, the same experiment was repeated with BMDMs with a 1:150 cell to bead ratio.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phagocytosis of Apoptotic Cells by BMDMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMDMs were plated at 5×104 cells/well in 8-well glass slides. The macrophages were labeled with cell-permeant dye Calcein, AM (Cat# C1430, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions for 2 h. Apoptosis in H9c2 cells was induced by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) treatment (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 4 h. The apoptotic cells were labeled with PKH26 (red fluorescence, Catalog-MINI26-1KT, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Apoptotic H9c2 cells were overlaid on BMDMs (1:1 ratio of macrophage: apoptotic cells) and incubated for 2 h. After 2 h, cells were washed 4 times with ice-cold PBS to remove the unengulfed apoptotic cells. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, counterstained with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and mounted for fluorescence microscopy (Olympus IX83 fluorescence microscope). Phagocytosis was determined by counting cells containing engulfed red fluorescent apoptotic cells. A minimum of 300 macrophages was counted per well in triplicate. Data were represented as percent phagocytosis, i.e., the total number of cells with ingested apoptotic cells divided by the total number of macrophages counted times 100. In a separate phagocytosis experiment, BMDMs were stained with Flash Phalloidin Green 488 (Cat# 424201, BioLegend, USA) to observe macrophage cell morphology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Zebrafish Infection Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transparent casper zebrafish larvae were removed from their chorion with tweezers and infected at 1 day postfertilization (dpf) via the caudal vein with a bacterial suspension. The injected CFU was determined before and after injection of the larvae to rule out blockage of the needle (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Injection stocks were prepared by growing bacteria until the logarithmic phase (OD600 of 0.7 to 1). Bacteria were spun down at low speed for 1 min to remove the largest clumps, washed with 0.3% Tween 80 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and sonicated briefly for declumping. Bacteria were resuspended in PBS with 20% glycerol and 2% polyvinylpyrrolidone and stored at −80°C. Before use, bacteria were resuspended in PBS containing 0.17% (vol/vol) phenol red (Sigma) to aid visualization of the injection process. To determine the exact number of bacteria injected, the injection volume was plated on 7H10 plates containing the proper antibiotic selection. At 4 days postinfection (dpi), larvae were analyzed with an Olympus IX83 fluorescence microscope. Bright-field and fluorescence images were acquired with an Olympus IX83 microscope equipped with an Orca-flash 4.0 LT camera. Infection levels were quantified with CellProfiler 3.15. Zebrafish were manually delineated followed by integrating the fluorescent intensity of the entire fish.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Lem8 Translocation Assay in L. pneumophila

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To test the Dot/Icm-dependent translocation into host cells, Lem8 was cloned intro pXDC61m (Zhu et al., 2011 (link)) to generate s β-lactamase-Lem8 fusion. This plasmid was introduced wild-type or the dotA mutant of L. pneumophila and the resulting strains were used to infect U937 cells at an multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20 after 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) induction. One hour after infection, the CCF4-AM substrates (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were added into the medium and the cells were incubated for another 2 hr at 25°C, followed by image acquisition using an Olympus IX-83 fluorescence microscope. The translocation of Lem8 was assessed by calculating the percentage of cells emitting blue fluorescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Sperm Viability Assay by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thawed semen samples were centrifuged 1,500g for 10 min at 25 ℃. The pellet was washed twice and re‐suspended with 1 ml of PBS including 10% Bovine serum albumin (BSA). The sperm sample was incubated for 30 min in 20 μM of SYBR and 14 and 12 μM of PI at 30℃ in a dark incubator. Next, the sperm samples were left at room temperature for 20 min to measure the survival rate by time. To analyse sperm viability using an Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Bioscience, USA), the samples were diluted to 1 x 105 sperm/ml with PBS including 10% BSA solution to reduce the sperm concentration. The number of sperm stained in green (FL1‐A) was divided by the total number of sperm (green, orange and red) to measure viability for each. To confirm the viability of sperm, each group of sperm samples was measured using IX83 fluorescence microscope (OLYMPUS, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!