The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using anti cd4 pe

1

Multiparametric Analysis of Thymocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions of thymocytes were stained for 20 min with anti-CD4-PE, anti-CD8-FITC, or anti-TCR-β-APC antibodies (1:50; Miltenyi Biotec, Bologna, Italy) at 4 °C. Dead cells were stained with SYTOX® Blue (Thermo Fisher Scientific-Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). Analysis was performed with CyAn cytofluorimeter (Dako, Milan, Italy) and analyzed using FlowJo software (version 7.2.4). Blood was collected from mouse eyes 1 week before the sacrifice and cells stained with anti-CD45-eFluor450 antibody (1:100; eBioscence, San Diego, CA, USA) to exclude red cells and with anti-CD3-APC, anti-CD4-PE, and anti-CD8-FITC antibodies (1:50; Miltenyi Biotec) to detect mature T cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unpurified splenocytes or isolated subpopulations were subjected to flow cytometric analyses to validate the quality of the cells. Prior to staining, the Fc receptors were blocked by preincubation with anti‐CD16/CD32 antibodies (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 10 minutes on ice. Surface staining was accomplished by incubating the cells with fluorochrome‐conjugated specific antibodies for 20 minutes in the dark on ice. The following antibodies (all purchased from Miltenyi Biotec) were employed: anti‐CD3‐FITC (130‐102‐496), anti‐CD4‐FITC (130‐102‐541), anti‐CD4‐PE (130‐102‐619), anti‐CD8‐PE (130‐102‐595), anti‐CD19‐FITC (130‐092‐042), anti‐CD25‐APC (130‐102‐787), anti‐CD44‐APC (130‐102‐563), anti‐CD62L‐PE (130‐102‐907).
Intracellular staining of FoxP3 was performed using an anti‐FoxP3‐PE antibody (130‐098‐119; Miltenyi Biotec) and the FoxP3 Staining Buffer Set (130‐093‐142; Miltenyi Biotec) following the given instructions.
Flow cytometric analyses were run on a FACS Verse (BD Biosciences) or FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences). A total of 10 000 events per sample were acquired and data were evaluated using the FACS Suite or CellQuest Pro software (both BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Characterization of T Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PB mononuclear cells were isolated by Pancoll density centrifugation (PAN-Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany). Leukemic cells were isolated as CD3+CD8+CD57+ T cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS, ARIA III, BD Biosciences; Heidelberg, Germany). T cells from healthy donors were initially enriched (> 98% purity) for either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells by magnetic cell separation using the MACS system (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Afterward, the T cell subsets from healthy donors were isolated by FACS using the following strategies: CD8 naïve T cells: CD8+CD45RA+CD27+, CD8 central memory T cells: CD8+CD45RACD27+, CD8 effector memory T cells: CD8+CD45RACD27, CD4 naïve T cells: CD4+CD45RA+CD27+, CD4 central memory T cells: CD4+CD45RACD27+, and CD4 effector memory T cells: CD4+CD45RACD27. FACS confirmed a 90–99% purity of the T cell subsets. The following antibodies were used: anti-CD3-PerCP, anti-CD4-PE, anti-CD8-APC-Cy7, anti-CD27-APC, and anti-CD45RA-FITC (all Miltenyi Biotech). Genomic DNA was extracted from all samples using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
Analysis of differential gene expression by reverse transcription real-time PCR (qPCR) and Pyrosequencing is described in Additional file 11.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Flow Cytometric Analysis of Fetal Brain Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brains from 22- to 26-week-old animals were homogenized using a 5-ml Glass Tissue Grinder (A. Hartenstein). The homogenized solution was mixed with 100 % Percoll solution (GE healthcare) to a final 70 % Percoll solution and layered under a 30 % Percoll solution. After 30 min centrifugation at 500g without brake at RT, the cells were isolated from the 30–70 % layer and washed with PBS. Per staining, 100 000 cells were used. The staining was performed in FACS-PBS (PBS, 2 % FCS, 5 mM EDTA) in the presence of the FcBlocker (Miltenyi Biotec) using the following fluorescently labeled antibodies: anti-CD4-PE, anti-CD8-APC, anti-CD11b-FITC, and anti-CD45-APC (all from Miltenyi Biotec), for 15 min at RT in the dark. Samples were analyzed using a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter). Thirty thousand events were recorded. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using the FlowJo 8.5.3 software (FlowJo, LLC). For viability testing, the Fixable Viability Dye eFluor® 780 (eBioscience) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The gating of the living cell population was performed based on the live staining; dead cell populations were excluded. The total cell number was determined utilizing bead measurement (Beckman Coulter CC Size Standard L10), and the absolute cell numbers were calculated according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Exercise-Induced Immune Response Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood was taken from participants before, immediately postexercise and 1 h post exercise bout by a trained phlebotomist using venepuncture at each timepoint. Peripheral blood was drawn into 1 × 6 mL vacutainers spray‐coated with EDTA anti‐coagulant, and 1 × 6 mL serum gel vacutainer (BD Biosciences, UK), with the first 3 mL of peripheral blood discarded. Total blood differential leukocyte counts were determined using an automated hematology analyzer (XS 1000i, Sysmex, UK). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated using density gradient centrifugation as described elsewhere (Ross et al. 2016). PBMCs were stained with anti‐CD3‐FITC, anti‐CD31‐APC, and anti‐CD28‐PE‐Cy5 antibodies (all BD Biosciences, UK), with subanalysis of T‐cell subsets using anti‐CD4‐PE (Miltenyi‐Biotec, Germany) and anti‐CD8‐PE (BD Biosciences, UK) antibodies to determine CD4+ and CD8+ TANG cells. PBMCs incubated for 30 min prior to enumeration by flow cytometry.
Peripheral blood collected in the serum gel vacutainer was allowed to clot for 30 min prior to centrifugation (1500g for 10 min at 21°C). Serum was obtained and stored at −80°C for analysis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Flow Cytometry for NK Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multi-parameter flow cytometry was performed using a lysed-whole-blood technique without isolation of cells on a density gradient, using a commercially available red cell lysing solution, Optilyse B (Beckman Coulter). The cell labelling and membrane fixation/permeabilization procedures were done by standard methods; the cell staining was performed as described in (Babusikova et al. 2008) . We used monoclonal antibodies targeting membrane antigens: anti-CD45-ECD (Beckman Coulter), anti-CD16-FITC (Beckman Coulter), anti-CD11b-PE (Miltenyi Biotec), anti-CD3-FITC (Miltenyi Biotec), anti CD4-PE (Miltenyi Biotec), anti-CD8-APC (Miltenyi Biotec), anti-CD25-Pacific Blue (ExBio Praha), anti-CD19-FITC (Miltenyi Biotec) and anti-CD56-PE (Beckman Coulter), and FACS analysis was performed by FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). The data were analysed using FCS Express 4.0 (De Novo Software). NK cells were identified as CD3-CD56 + cells. To determine the absolute number of NK cells, equal volumes (100 μl) of Flow-Count Fluorospheres (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA) and cells were mixed, and the NK cell concentration was calculated according to the formula: NK cells/μl = (count NK cells × concentration beads)/ (count beads).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!