The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using oligo

1

Assessing Mitochondrial Dynamics and Autophagy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all the studies, (R)-9b treatment was given in 1% serum condition at concentration 1 μM until specifically indicated for time intervals as per experiments. WT and Mut-ATP5F1A cells were cultured in media with 1% serum for 12 h and processed for immunofluorescence-based detection of MitoTracker (Thermo fisher scientific, M7512) staining. In these experiments Oligomycin (Oligo; Sigma, 579–13-5) treatment (0.5 μM) for 3 h was used as control for depletion of MitoTracker intensity. WT and Mut-ATP5F1A cells were cultured in media with 1% serum for 72 h for immunofluorescence-based detection of LC3B-II, LysoTracker (Invitrogen, L12492) staining. For experiments involving TMRE (Abcam, ab113852)-based immunofluorescence or flow cytometry, cells were treated with Oligo (0.5 μM) for 1 h or FCCP (Sigma, 370–86-5) (0.5 μM) for 1 h prior to harvesting cells. For experiments involving 3-MA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-205,596; 50 μM) and Mdivi-1 (Selleckchem, S7162; 50 μM) treatments, WT and Mut-ATP5F1A cells were cultured in 1% serum for 12 h followed by 48, 72 or 96 h of (R)-9b treatment, as per experiments. sodium orthovanadate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, S454-50; 1 μM) and sodium fluoride (Sigma, S6521; 1 μM) were added to culture media for inhibition of protease for 3 h prior to termination of respective experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polymerization of Ethylene Glycol Monomers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The monomers used were oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate with 4–5 ethylene oxide units, (OEGMMA, Mn = 300, d = 1.05 g/mL, purity > 98%) and oligo(ethylene glycol) hydroxyl ethyl methacrylate with nearly 6 ethylene oxide units (OEGHEMA, Mn = 360, d = 1.105 g/mL, purity > 97%), both from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MI, USA). The free radical initiator used in the polymerization experiments was benzoyl peroxide (BPO) (purity > 97 %, from Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland), and it was purified by fractional recrystallization twice from methanol (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA). AgNO3 used as a precursor for the formation of AgNPs was supplied by Mallinckrodt (C = 0.05 mol/L). ZnO was purchased from Aldrich in the form of nanopowder with a size < 100 nm (d = 5.61 g/mL). TiO2 was also supplied by Aldrich in the form of nanopowder with a size < 100 nm (d = 3.8 g/mL). All other chemicals used were of reagent grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative RT-PCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from cells using the Qiagen RNeasy mini kit and quantified using a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer. The RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using the VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). The qPCR reactions were performed in triplicate on a StepOne Real-Time PCR machine (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the Fast SYBR Green master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Oligos were ordered from Sigma Aldrich. Primer sequences are listed in Additional file 1. Relative amounts of mRNA were calculated using the ΔΔCT method normalized to RPLPO mRNA as a reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Lentiviral Plasmid Construction for Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lentiviral plasmids used the pHRSIN backbone 64 and the packaging plasmids pMD.G (lentiviral VSVG) and pMD.GagPol (lentiviral Gag/Pol). IMAGE cDNA clones for AUP1 (IMAGE ID: 5578910) and MARCH6 (IMAGE ID: 40148713) (Source Bioscience) were cloned into pHRSIN.pSFFV.pGK.Puro with an N‐terminal or C‐terminal HA tag (HA‐AUP1 and MARCH6‐HA). pDEST17‐UbE2J2 was a gift from Wade Harper (Addgene plasmid #15794) and cloned using Gibson Assembly® to create pHRSIN‐pSFFV‐FLAG‐UBE2J2‐pGK‐Blasto. pMXs‐3XHA‐EGFP‐OMP25 was a gift from David Sabatini (Addgene plasmid # 83356). pHRSIN.pGK.Puro HA‐UBE2G2 was cloned from pcDNA3 Ube2G2‐myc (gift from John Christianson). pHRSIN.pGK.Puro TRC8‐HA and pHRSIN.pGK.Puro TRC8ΔRING‐HA were cloned from pcDNA6 TRC8‐HA 19. The catalytically inactive mutants (MARCH6 C9A and UBE2G2 C89A) were generated using site‐directed mutagenesis. The GFP‐CL1 (GFPu) construct was a gift from Ron Kopito. The CL1 sequence was amplified and cloned at C‐terminus of mCherry (pHRSIN‐mCherry PGK‐Puro). CL1 mutations were introduced by oligos (Sigma) and cloned into pHRSIN‐mCherry lentivirus vector. The SPP‐expressing lentiviral plasmids (pHRSIN SPP‐myc) and the ubiquitin lentiviral constructs, expressing a His‐ubiquitin/GFP (pHRSIN His‐Ub‐GFP), which result in co‐translational cleavage of GFP from ubiquitin, have been described previously 27, 38.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Drosophila Protein Isoforms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pMK33-klar-C-FLAG-HA: protein fragment expressed is part of isoform PA (starting amino acid: 1774), isoform PB (starting amino acid: 1556), isoform PE (starting amino acid: 1784), isoform PG (starting amino acid: 692) and isoform PI (starting amino acid: 33). pMK33-Msp300-C-FLAG-HA: protein fragment expressed is part of isoforms PB, PD, PL (starting amino acid: 7976), isoforms PE, PF, PG, PH, PM (starting amino acid: 1) and isoform PL (starting amino acid: 7616). Both pMK33 clones are gifts from Dr. Wade Harper (Guruharsha et al., 2011 (link), Yu et al., 2011 (link)). UAS-ensconsin-HA is a gift from Mary Baylies (Metzger et al., 2012 (link)). The PGEX-4T-HHARI RBR and PGEX-4T2-Parkin RBR constructs was previously published and was obtained from Addgene (#31254 and #31255)(Wenzel et al., 2011 (link)). All oligos used (Sigma) for construct generation (below) are detailed in Supplementary Table 1. PCRs were performed using Q5 2X master mix (NEB).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Site-Directed Mutagenesis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For making mutants for the study, site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the kit and guidelines given in the QuickChange™ Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit from Stratagene. Oligos were procured from Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibody-based Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, A8592), anti-GFP antibody (Roche, 11,814,460,001), anti-GAPDH antibody (Ambion, AM4300), anti-H4 (Millipore, 07-108) and oligos (Sigma-Aldrich) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

MSAP DNA methylation profiling of barley

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MSAP was used for the DNA methylation profiling of barley plants according to the method of Rodríguez López et al. (2012) (link). To ensure marker reproducibility, DNA samples were analyzed in two technical replicates. Thus, samples were digested using a methylation insensitive restriction enzyme EcoRI in combination with either HpaII or MspI (isoschizomers), which show differential sensitivity to cytosine methylation at CCGG positions. Digested DNA fragments were ligated to adapters (Table 1) with one end cohesive with restriction products generated by EcoRI or HpaII/MspI. Digestion and ligation reactions were performed in a single solution of 11 µl comprising: 1.1 µl T4 ligase buffer; 0.1 µl HpaII; 0.05 µl MspI; 0.25 µl EcoRI; 0.05 µl T4 ligase; 0.55 µl BSA ; 1.1 µl NaCl ; 1 µl Adapter EcoRI; 1 µl Adapter HpaII/MspI; 5.5 µl DNA sample and 0.3 µl pure water. Enzymes and buffer were acquired from New England Biolabs, Australia (NEB) and oligos were produced at Sigma-Aldrich, Australia. The solution was incubated for 2 h at 37°C, then enzymes were inactivated at 65°C for 10 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DNA Methylation Profiling of Barley Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MSAP was used for the DNA methylation profiling of barley plants according to the method of Rodríguez López et al. (2012) . To ensure marker reproducibility, DNA samples were analysed in two technical replicates. Thus, samples were digested using a methylation insensitive restriction enzyme EcoRI in combination with either HpaII or MspI (isoschizomers), which show differential sensitivity to cytosine methylation at CCGG positions. Digested DNA fragments were ligated to adapters (Table 1) with one end cohesive with restriction products generated by EcoRI or HpaII/MspI. Digestion and ligation reactions were performed in a single solution of 11 µl comprising: 1.1 µl T4 ligase buffer; 0.1 µl HpaII; 0.05 µl MspI; 0.25 µl EcoRI; 0.05 µl T4 ligase; 0.55 µl BSA ; 1.1 µl NaCl ; 1 µl Adapter EcoRI; 1 µl Adapter HpaII/MspI; 5.5 µl DNA sample and 0.3 µl pure water. Enzymes and buffer were acquired from New England Biolabs, Australia (NEB) and oligos were produced at Sigma-Aldrich, Australia. The solution was incubated for 2h at 37ºC, then enzymes were inactivated at 65ºC for 10 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mitochondrial Function Profiling in BMDMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMDMs collected from lipin-1mEnzyKO, lipin-1mKO, and littermate control mice were seeded at a density of 150,000 cells per well on XF24 cell culture microplates and allowed to incubate for 4 h. Experiments were conducted in XF assay medium containing 25 mM glucose, 2 mM l-glutamine, and 1 mM sodium pyruvate and analyzed using a Seahorse XFe 24 extracellular flux analyzer (Agilent Technologies). Where indicated, the following were injected: ATP-synthesis inhibitor Oligomycin (Oligo; 1 μM), carbonyl cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone (FCCP) (2 μM) to uncouple ATP synthesis, rotenone (100 nM) to block complex I, and antimycin A (1 μM) (Sigma-Aldrich) to block complex III. Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was analyzed using Wave Desktop software (Agilent Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!