The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Empyrean powder diffractometer

Manufactured by Malvern Panalytical
Sourced in Netherlands

The Empyrean powder diffractometer is a laboratory instrument designed for the analysis and characterization of powder samples. It utilizes X-ray diffraction technology to provide detailed information about the crystal structure, phase composition, and other properties of the material under investigation. The core function of the Empyrean is to accurately measure and analyze the diffraction patterns generated by the interaction of X-rays with the atoms in the powder sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

32 protocols using empyrean powder diffractometer

1

Magnetic Iron Oxides Characterization by XRD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed to evaluate the presence of magnetic iron oxides in the produced materials. Measurements were performed at room temperature with a PANalytical Empyrean powder diffractometer using monochromated CuKα radiation (λ = 1.541º
A) in the 10-80º 2θ range at 0.02º resolution, and 4000 acquisition points per step. The incident beam optics included a Soller slit of 0.04 rad, a 10 mm fixed mask, a divergence fixed slit of 1=4 and an anti-scatter slit of 1=8. The diffracted beam optics included a Soller slit of 0.04 rad and anti-scatter slit of 7.5 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Charged Carbon Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction data of fully discharged and charged carbon electrodes (cut-off voltages of 2.0 V and 4.2 V) were recorded with an Empyrean powder diffractometer (PANalytical) using a Cu K a source (40 kV, 40 mA). The corresponding Li-O 2 cells were disassembled in a glovebox, the carbon electrodes were subsequently washed with pure diglyme and analysed in a gas-tight sample holder with a 7.5 mm thick Kapton foil (Chemplex) atop. The diffraction data were further processed with the software X'Pert Highscore Plus (PANalytical) including a baseline subtraction and a z-correction of the sample position.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

X-Ray Powder Diffraction Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample characterization was performed by X-Ray Powder Diffraction method. Data were collected on Panalytical Empyrean Powder Diffractometer equipped with position sensitive detector (PSD) PIXCEL and Graphite monochromator on the diffracted beam The Cu K α radiation (α = 1.541 Å) was used at operation conditions (voltage and current) 40 kV and 30 mA. The usual Bragg-Brentano q/2q was employed. q/2q scans were run for 15 min in a 2q range of 5-60
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of New Material

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Bruker AV-400 NMR spectrometer was applied to record the liquid 1H NMR spectra. Solid-state 13 C NMR spectra were recorded on an AVIII 500 MHz solid-state NMR spectrometer. The FTIR spectra (KBr) were obtained using a SHIMADZU IRAffinity-1 Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was recorded on a SHIMADZU DTG-60 thermal analyzer under N2. PXRD data were collected on a PANalytical B.V. Empyrean powder diffractometer using a Cu Kα source (λ = 1.5418 Å). For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, JEOL JSM-6700 scanning electron microscope was applied. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained on JEM-2100 transmission electron microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis of Garnet-Type LLZO Solid Electrolyte

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To synthesize garnet-type solid electrolyte Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) Li2CO3 (>99.0%, Sigma-Aldrich), La(OH)3 (99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich), Al2O3 (99.8%, abcr), and ZrO2 nano-powder (<100 nm, Sigma-Aldrich) were mixed in a stoichiometric ratio. This mixture was then ball-milled for 12 h at 350 rpm under pure oxygen atmosphere. After milling, the homogenized powder was pressed into large pellets in MgO-crucibles and then calcined at 1000 °C for 4 h under a 150-sccm oxygen flow. After ball-milling again for 20 h at 350 rpm, small pellets with diameters of ~8.3 mm and thicknesses of 2 mm were isostatically pressed with 380 MPa and sintered at 1230 °C in MgO-crucibles with mother powder (calcined LLZO powder) under oxygen flow. The LLZO pellets have a porosity of ~(94 ± 2)%, their ionic conductivity is (4.6 ± 0.4)10−4 S cm−1. The ionic conductivity is calculated by considering the thickness, the contact area with the electrode, and the total bulk and grain boundaries resistance of the LLZO pellet in a Li|LLZO|Li symmetric cell extracted by fitting of electrochemical impedance result which is acquired in at 25 °C (supplementary Fig. 2). The sintered LLZO was characterized with x-ray diffraction by using a PANalytical Empyrean powder diffractometer in Bragg-Brentano θ-θ geometry with copper Kα radiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

XRD Analysis of Crystalline Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystallographic phase and the orientation of the films were studied by XRD. A Panalytical Empyrean powder diffractometer equipped with PIXcel linear detector and monochromator on diffracted beam was used. Data were collected in the 2θ/θ geometry using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5405 Å) at 40 kV and 30 mA. Diffraction patterns were taken during 8 minutes in a 2θ range of 20–65° with a step size of ~0.039°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Amorphous Naloxone Stability Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 32

Phase analysis of two naloxone samples was performed by the X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) method. The data were collected on a Panalytical Empyrean powder diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation, λ=1.54178 Å) equipped with an X'Celerator linear detector and operated at V=40 kV, I=30 mA. Scans were run in a 2q range of 3-38° with step equal to ˜0.0167°, scan speed ˜0.042°/sec. Peak lists were automatically generated using Match! 2 p-XRD analysis software.

XRD pattern images of raw naloxone HCl, lactose monohydrate and microspheres mixed with lactose monohydrate batch PNLX070729 of the present invention are shown in FIG. 18.

As can be seen from FIG. 18, no naloxone HCl peaks are observed in the pattern of naloxone microspheres. The determined peaks belong to lactose monohydrate, only suggesting that naloxone HCl has an amorphous structure.

Remarkably, this amorphous structure was shown to be stable for 6 months, as shown in FIG. 19. The bottom pattern belongs to the initial product while the upper curve reflects the structure after six months. Both patterns are similar.

Thus not only is naloxone stable for at least 6 months, it also retains an amorphous structure.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Nanoparticle Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Routine X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns were collected using a conventional PANalytical Empyrean powder diffractometer (PANalytical Lelyweg, Almelo, The Netherlands, θ–2θ) using λCu Kα1, and Kα2 radiation (λ = 1.54051 and 1.54433 A°). The XRPD patterns were carried out with a 2θ scan between 3–35° with a step size of 0.013° and a scanning speed of 0.1°·s−1. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic analyses were performed in a Nicolet 6700 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) infrared spectrometer with the help of an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) diamond accessory. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were obtained, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) elemental mapping was performed using a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (Centre of Scientific Instrumentation of the University of Granada, Granada, Spain). 25 μL of each sample was incubated on carbon-coated grids for 5 min before being washed off with ultra-pure water. Uranyl acetate was employed for negative stained samples. Grids were observed in a High-Resolution TEM (HRTEM) TITAN from FEI Company (Hillsboro, OR, USA) operated at 300 kV. Doxorubicin and Furazan fluorescence measurements were performed with a Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrometer from Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a PerkinElmer Spectrum FL 1.4.0 (Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Crystallite Size Determination via XRD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase composition was determined using Empyrean powder diffractometer (PANalytical, Netherlands) with CuKα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) at a scanning speed of 0.3°/min with a measurement range of 10–85°. For the determination of the instrumental broadening in the analysis of crystallite size, LaB6 single crystal was used as a standard. The crystallite size was calculated using Scherrer Eq. (1): D=Kλ/βcosθ where D is the crystallite size (nm), K – shape factor, λ – wavelength of the radiation (nm), β – full width at half maximum of the peak with considering the instrumental broadening (β = βsampleβLaB6), θ – Bragg angle
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Carboxylatopillar[5]arene Nanomaterial Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rhodamine 6G
(R6G), citric acid, ethylenediamine, N-hydroxysuccinimide
(NHS), and 1-ethyl-3-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)carbodimide hydrochloride
(EDC·HCl) were purchased from Aladdin. NaOH was obtained from
Energy Chemical. Chlorine salts (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+), gallic acid, ascorbic acid, glucose,
fructose, lysine, cysteine, and rutin were bought from Sinopharm Chemical
Reagent Co., Ltd., China. Carboxylatopillar[5]arene (CP[5]) was synthesized
according to our published procedure.41 (link)Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were acquired
by using a JEM 2100F instrument operating at an accelerating voltage
of 200 kV. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained
by using a Bruker Vertex 80 V spectrometer. Powder X-ray diffraction
(PXRD) measurements were conducted by using a PANalytical B.V. Empyrean
powder diffractometer. Ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis)
spectra were recorded using a Shimadzu UV-2550 instrument. Thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA) was performed on a Q500 instrument. Fluorescence spectra
were recorded in quartz cuvettes by using a Shimadzu RF-5301PC spectrophotometer.
ζ potentials were recorded on a Particle Sizing Systems Z3000
instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!