The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dual belt instrumented treadmill

Manufactured by Bertec
Sourced in United States

The Dual-belt instrumented treadmill is a laboratory equipment designed for gait and biomechanics research. It consists of two independent belt-driven treadmills with force plates integrated into each belt to measure ground reaction forces. The treadmill allows for the assessment of various gait parameters and kinetic data during walking or running.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using dual belt instrumented treadmill

1

Exoskeleton Assisted Treadmill Walking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants walked at 1.3m/s on an instrumented dual-belt treadmill (Bertec Corporation, Columbus, OH, USA) in the following conditions. Participants first walked for two minutes without wearing the exoskeleton to acclimate to walking on the dual-belt treadmill, after which they were fitted with the exoskeleton. Participants then walked for 20 minutes wearing the exoskeleton, during which the stiffness controller was off for the first five minutes, on for the next ten minutes, and off again during the remaining five minutes (Figure 1C).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Biomechanics of Inclined Treadmill Walking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirteen healthy adults (4 female/9 male, 67±10 kg, 173±9 cm, 28±7 years) provided written informed consent to participate in the protocol approved by the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Human Subjects Institutional Review Board. Participants walked at 1.25 m/s on an instrumented dual-belt treadmill (Bertec Corp., Columbus, OH) on slopes of 0°, ±3°, ±6°, and ±9° in randomized order while we measured bilateral ground reaction forces (GRFs, 1500 Hz), whole-body kinematics (100 Hz, Vicon Inc., Centennial, CO) and electromyographic (EMG) signals (1500 Hz, Noraxon Corp., Scottsdale, AZ) from eight muscles of each leg (Table 1). For each person (13 total participants), three gait cycles were analyzed for each slope (7 total slopes), for a total of 273 simulations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Imaging of Single-Leg Jump

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One knee of each participant was imaged at 3T using a Trio Tim Siemens magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Sagittal, coronal, and axial plane images were acquired using a double-echo steady-state sequence (voxel size, 0.3 × 0.3 × 1 mm 3 ; flip angle, 25°; repetition time, 17 ms; echo time, 6 ms) and an 8-channel knee coil. 11, 39 High-speed biplanar radiographs (matrix size, 1152 × 1152 pixels 2 ; frame rate, 120 Hz; pulse width, 1.5 ms) were obtained as participants performed a single-leg jump. 18, 20 Specifically, participants were asked to keep their trunk upright, jump vertically, and land on the same location of the force plate embedded in the treadmill. After several practice jumps to ensure that the participant was able to perform the motion within the field of view, high-speed biplanar radiographs were obtained at a frame rate of 120 Hz as the participant performed the motion. Ground-reaction forces (GRFs) were obtained at a sampling rate of 1200 Hz using an instrumented dual-belt treadmill (Bertec).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Knee MRI and Jump Kinematics Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One knee of each participant was imaged at 3T using a Trio Tim Siemens magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Sagittal, coronal, and axial plane images were acquired using a double-echo steady-state sequence (voxel size, 0.3 × 0.3 × 1 mm3; flip angle, 25°; repetition time, 17 ms; echo time, 6 ms) and an 8-channel knee coil.11 (link),39 (link) High-speed biplanar radiographs (matrix size, 1152 × 1152 pixels2; frame rate, 120 Hz; pulse width, 1.5 ms) were obtained as participants performed a single-leg jump.18 (link),20 Specifically, participants were asked to keep their trunk upright, jump vertically, and land on the same location of the force plate embedded in the treadmill. After several practice jumps to ensure that the participant was able to perform the motion within the field of view, high-speed biplanar radiographs were obtained at a frame rate of 120 Hz as the participant performed the motion. Ground-reaction forces (GRFs) were obtained at a sampling rate of 1200 Hz using an instrumented dual-belt treadmill (Bertec).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synchronized Biplane Radiography of Knee Kinematics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data collection and processing details have been previously published [25 (link)]. Briefly, synchronized biplane radiographs of the knee were collected (100 images/sec for 1.0 sec, maximum 90 kV, 160 mA, 1 ms pulse width) during walking at a self-selected speed (average 1.3 ± 0.2 m/s) on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill (Bertec Corp, Columbus, OH). Two trials were imaged from terminal swing to mid stance and two trials were imaged from mid stance to terminal swing, for each knee. Ground reaction forces (GRF) were recorded from the instrumented treadmill at 1000 Hz. Foot strike and toe off events were denoted using a 50 N threshold in the vertical component of the GRF. Bilateral computed tomography (CT) scans of each participant’s knees were also obtained (0.6 × 0.6 mm in-plane resolution, 1.25 mm slice thickness).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Dual-Belt Treadmill Imaging System

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A custom DF system consisting of two x-ray emitters, 12” image
intensifiers, and high-speed cameras [17 (link)]
was positioned around a dual-belt instrumented treadmill (Bertec, Columbus, OH)
(Figure 1). Specimens were placed in
the shared field of view (FOV) (Figure 1).
The image space was calibrated using an acrylic cube with 19 beads [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Instrumented Treadmill for Gait Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ground reaction forces will be collected at 1000 Hz using a dual-belt instrumented treadmill (Bertec Corp). This system contains two side-by-side 30 × 180 cm belts. The belts are driven by independent (but synchronized) motor systems, and each belt/motor system is configured on a rigid platform supported by multi-axis load cells. This configuration enables the assessment of three-dimensional foot-ground reaction forces, applied torque, and center of pressure location independently for each foot. Ground reaction force data will be collected primarily to determine foot strike (greater than 50 N total force) and toe off (less than 50 N total force) during the gait cycle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Kinematic Analysis of Lower Limb Movements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One static (standing) and three dynamic activities were completed on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill (Bertec Corporation, Columbus, OH, USA), including level walk at a self-selected over-ground walking speed, internal rotation, and external rotation [9 (link), 13 (link), 15 (link), 16 ]. For the static trial, subjects were instructed to stand upright with their feet hip-width apart and pointed forward, but the position of their feet was not strictly enforced by research personnel. The internal and external rotation activities were performed to end range of motion with both feet on the ground, while angular changes were permitted at the ankle and knee joints. The order of the dynamic activities was randomized. One trial of the static activity and two trials of the dynamic activities were collected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Simultaneous Optical Motion Capture and Dual Force Treadmill Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects were imaged simultaneously using an optical motion capture system and DF (Fig. 1). The motion capture system utilized Vicon Nexus software (v1.8.5, Vicon Motion Systems, Oxford, UK) and 10 near infrared cameras to acquire reflective marker positions at 100 Hz. Activities were performed on a dual-belt, instrumented treadmill (Bertec Corporation, Columbus, OH, USA). Reflective markers were placed on the pelvis and thigh to locate bony landmarks and track segment motion [12 ]. Surface markers were placed on the left and right anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and iliac crests (ILC). A cluster of four markers on a rigid plate was strapped to the thigh with Velcro at a proximolateral position. Markers were also placed on the medial epicondyles of the knees and medial malleoli of the ankles to calculate leg length, which was required for predictive HJCs. Three dimensional (3D) skin marker positions were reconstructed and gap-filled in Vicon Nexus software. The Vicon and DF systems were synced temporally with an external trigger and spatially using a calibration cube that contained reflective markers with metal beads at their center [12 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Gait Biomechanics on Instrumented Treadmill

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants wore a safety harness attached to an overhead support, and walked on a dual belt instrumented treadmill (Bertec Corp, Columbus OH). The safety harness was attached to the overhead support with some slack, serving as a safety mechanism in case of a fall and did not support any body weight during walking. Body weight was recorded during static standing on the dual belt treadmill. We first determined each individual's self-selected walking speed on the instrumented treadmill. Once the self-selected walking speed was determined, each individual walked for 60 s. Ground reaction forces were sampled at 2000 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!