The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using duolink in situ detection kit

1

In Situ Proximity Ligation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CS3BE-cassette1 or CS3BE-wtCSAFlag-HA cells were fixed with 3% PFA for 12 min at RT and subsequently permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS at the indicated time points after UV-C irradiation (10 J/m2). PLA was performed by using the Duolink in situ Detection Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) following manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were incubated with provided blocking buffer for 30 min at RT, then incubated with anti-HA antibody (Cell Signaling, 3724; 1:1000) and anti-FECH antibodies (S. Cruz, sc-377377; 1:40) or anti-RNAP1 (RPA194, S. Cruz, sc-48385; 1:50) and anti-FECH (Abcam, ab55965; 1:50) and subsequently with anti-mouse PLUS and anti-rabbit MINUS PLA probes. Interaction foci were imaged using an Olympus IX71 inverted microscope equipped with a CCD camera (Robert Scientific Photometrics) and analyzed using the ImageJ software (49 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Proximity Ligation Assay for MDM2-FoxO3a

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PLA was performed using a Duolink In Situ Detection Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck) as recommended by the manufacturer. PLA probes were chosen to detect mouse (MDM2) and rabbit (FoxO3a) Abs. Samples were mounted on slides using a DUOLINK In Situ Mounting Medium with DAPI (for nuclear staining) and observed under a laser scanning confocal microscope (Olympus FV3000; Olympus Italia, Milan, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proximity Ligation Assay for Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A proximity ligation assay (PLA) was performed using a Duolink In Situ Detection Kit (Sigma, #DUO92008) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells plated on glass coverslips were fixed, permeabilized, blocked, and incubated with the indicated primary antibodies. Then, cells were hybridized to PLA probes. After ligation and amplification of PLA signals, the PLA puncta were photographed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying NPM-TLR4 Interaction via PLA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) (26 (link)) was performed with the DuoLink in situ detection kit (Sigma) to detect and quantify the interaction of NPM with TLR4. Cells were grown on slides in 35 mm plates, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 10 min, rinsed with PBS, and incubated for 1 h in the blocking buffer. α-NPM1 (ab15440; 1:400) or α-TLR4 (sc-293072; 1:100), α-rabbit PLUS/MINUS, and α-mouse PLUS/MINUS PLA probes were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and then washed. Hybridization, ligation, and amplification steps were performed for 30 min and polymerase reaction for 120 min at 37°C. Nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI (1:10,000 in PBS; Sigma). Images were captured with the ApoTome System (Zeiss) as described above. HFs and HaCaT cells were seeded on square glass coverslips. Subsequently, coverslips were removed and processed for PLA.
The PLA was quantified by counting the red dots and diving it for the number of nuclei per field, identified by DAPI staining by two independent observers, blinded to the status of the specimens. For each experiment, ~80–100 nuclei per treatment were accomplished. Six different primary HFs derived from healthy subjects and 5 different HaCaT experiments were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proximity Ligation Assay for Telomere-Associated Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells grown on coverslips were fixed in methanol for 10 min, blocked and stained as described above for immunostaining with the following primary antibodies couples: mouse anti-TRF2 (Imgenex 124A) with rabbit anti-lamin B1 (ab16048, Abcam) or mouse anti-RAP1 (ab14404, Abcam) with rabbit anti-lamin B1 (ab16048, Abcam) or mouse anti-HA (HA.11, Biolegend) with rabbit anti-lamin B1 (ab16048, Abcam) or mouse anti-GFP (ab1218, Abcam) with rabbit anti-lamin B1 (ab16048, Abcam) or rabbit anti-Flag (F7425, Sigma) with mouse anti-TRF2 (Santacruz B-5). PLA was performed using the Duolink in situ detection Kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For some experiments, when indicated in figure legends, PLA was coupled with immunostaining of lamin B1 to detect lamin B1-positive cells. For experiments with Flag-lamin B1 constructs or with HA-TRF2-Linker, anti-Flag and anti-HA antibodies, were used to detect Flag or HA expression intensity, respectively. Digital images were acquired with the SPE confocal microscope using a 63×-objective lens. Images were processed with ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In Situ Proximity Ligation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) was performed using Duolink In Situ Detection kit (Sigma-Aldrich) as described previously [19 (link)]. Each red spot represents a cluster of protein-protein interaction, and distinct red spots were detected using confocal fluorescence microscope. The histogram quantifies the number of red spots per cell (n = 50 cells in two technical replicates). The results are representative of three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Situ Detection of ADAP-STAT1 Interaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The interaction between ADAP and STAT1 was detected in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) spleen sections by PLA using a Duolink in situ detection kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For immunofluorescence microscopy, FFPE tissue slides (5 μm) were deparaffinized and rehydrated with ethanol, followed by antigen retrieval in boiling citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 20 min. After blocking in blocking solution for 30 min at 25 °C, the slides were incubated in primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation in Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibodies, Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibodies and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-CD68 for 1 h at 25 °C. Tissue autofluorescence was quenched by treatment with TrueBlack (Biotium) for 30 s. Nuclei were stained with DAPI solution. Imaging was performed at 40× or 60× magnification on a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 880) and analyzed with Zen software (Zeiss) and ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Proximity Ligation Assay for Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded to a density of 50–70% on 12 mm glass coverslips coated in poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, P8920). Cells were fixed with a 2% PFA solution (2% PFA, 0.2% Triton-X-100, pH 8.2), washed with 1X PBS (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4), permeabilized with 0.5% tergitol (Sigma-Aldrich, NP40S), and washed with 1X PBS. PLAs were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions using the Duolink In Situ Detection Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, DUO92013). Confocal microscopy was done at the SickKids Imaging Facility and foci counted using CellProfiler [106 (link)]. Signal intensity was obtained using ImageJ, with background signal subtracted for each figure [107 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In situ mLST8-mTOR Interaction Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in situ interaction between mLST8 and mTOR in mLST8 KO H1299 cells stably overexpressing FLAG-mLST8-WT, -G302R, or -E303D mutants was detected using a Duolink® in situ detection Kit (Sigma). Briefly, H1299 cells were attached to 23-well slides and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton x-100 for 30 min. H1299 cells were incubated with two primary antibodies (mTOR and FLAG), and then incubated with a pair of PLA probes composed of species-specific secondary antibodies conjugated to complementary oligonucleotides. After adding the hybridization solution and ligase, oligonucleotides formed a circle when proteins were very close. Finally, the polymerase and nucleotides participate in the formation of rolling-circle amplification, which is visualized by red fluorescence. The cells were imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM880, Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Interactions Visualization in VSMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Interactions between different proteins were investigated with a Duolink® in situ detection kit (Sigma) as described previously (Shi et al. 2017a). Single VSMCs were fixed and permeabilized as per immunofluorescence and blocking was performed with Duolink blocking buffer for 1 h at 37°C. Cells were then incubated with appropriate antibodies overnight at 4°C as per immunofluorescence experiments plus mouse anti‐P‐Ser (dilution 1:100; sc‐16B4; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti‐P‐Thr (dilution 1:100; sc‐5267; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti‐TRPC1 (dilution 1:100; sc‐133 076; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and rabbit anti‐TRPC5 (T5E3), which was generated by GenScript using peptide sequences from a previously characterized putative extracellular region (1 μg mL−1) ((Xu & Beech, 2001; Xu et al. 2005a, 2005ba,b). The rest of the protocol was conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Fluorescent puncta were visualized with an A1R confocal microscope and images were analysed with ImageJ Fiji (https://fiji.sc). The mean number of puncta per cell was calculated by counting the number of particles across a z‐stack of the cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!