The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mac 50 1 nh

Manufactured by Radwag
Sourced in Poland

The MAC 50/1/NH is a laboratory balance manufactured by Radwag. It is designed for precise weighing of samples with a maximum capacity of 50 grams and a readability of 0.1 milligrams.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using mac 50 1 nh

1

Chemical Composition of Maritime Pine Bark

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bark from P. pinaster (approximate age 15 years) was collected in Ponte de Lima, Portugal (April 2016). Firstly, the bark was washed with distilled water and dried at 40 °C for 48 h and subsequently milled in a cutting mill (Retsch SM 2000) to a granulometry of 0.1–0.45 mm for general chemical composition and 1–1.6 mm for extraction process.
Chemical summative analyses were determined in accordance to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) official protocols, and included ethanol extractives (NREL/TP-510-42619), structural carbohydrates (namely cellulose and hemicellulose), klason and acid soluble lignin (NREL/TP-510-42618) and ash content (NREL/TP-510-42622). The mineral content was determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), after PB digestion with HNO3. Fat content was determined according to the official AOAC method (nº 920.39). Total proteins content estimated by using the N×6.25 conversion factor, was performed using a Kjeldahl distillator (Kjeltec 8400 Analyzer, FOSS, Hilleroed, Denmark) by quantification of Nitrogen after PB digestion. PB moisture was determined gravimetrically using a moisture analyzer (MAC 50/1/NH, RADWAG, Radom, Poland). All experiments were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Microbial Cell Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements of optical density in oil‐free cultures were performed at a wavelength of 600 nm using a spectrophotometer (Ultrospec 10, Biochrom). Cell counting was performed using disposable C‐Chip Neubauer Improved chambers (NanoEntek) and a light microscope (ICC 50, Leica Microsystems). CDW was calculated by subtracting the weight of empty filters, which were incubated overnight at 120°C, from the weight of filters used for culture filtration that were also incubated overnight at 120°C. Glass fiber filters with 0.4 μm diameter were used (GF‐5, Macherey Nagel). Weight was measured using a moisture analyzer (MAC 50/1/NH, RADWAG).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Olive Pomace Waste Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OP waste was supplied by Indulleida S.A. (Alguaire, Lleida, Spain). As soon as it was received, OP was placed in an oven and dried for 48 h at 60 °C. Subsequently, it was milled and sieved to obtain a material with a particle size between 0.45 to 0.9 mm and 7.41 ± 0.08% (w/w) of moisture determined through a moisture analyzer MAC 50/1/NH (Radwag, Radom, Poland). Finally, OP was kept at room temperature in a dark bottle until evaluated. All the analytical grade chemicals were acquired from Fisher Scientific (Leicestershire, UK) and Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biofilm Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biofilm weight was calculated by subtracting the weight of empty filters, which were incubated overnight at 100°C, from the weight of filters loaded with a harvested biofilm that were also incubated overnight at 100°C. Biofilm was harvested from four biological replicates of 5:1 approaches per oil phase using an inoculation loop. Glass fiber filters with 0.4 μm diameter were used (GF‐5, Macherey Nagel). Weight was measured using a moisture analyzer (MAC 50/1/NH, RADWAG).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proximal Composition Analysis of Rice Bran

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proximal composition of both rice bran was determined in triplicate. The moisture was determined gravimetrically using a moisture analyzer (MAC 50/1/NH, RADWAG, Poland). Total fat content was determined using petroleum ether as solvent, according to the official AOAC method nº 920.39 with some minor modifications. Protein content in the RB and RBD were determined by the Kjeldahl nitrogen analyzer (Kjeltec™ 8400 Analyzer Unit, Foss) using 5.95 as conversion factor (Amagliani et al., 2017b) . Ash and total extractives were determined according to NRLE/TP-510-42622 and NRLE/TP-510-42619 respectively. Total carbohydrate was estimated with the content of nitrogen-free extract using equation (1) (Huang and Lai, 2016) . (See Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Wheat Flour Moisture and OTA Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The moisture content of wheat flour reference materials was measured using a Radwag Mac 50/1/NH moisture analyser. The flour with 23.2 µg OTA kg -1 (Matrix A) contained 10.6% moisture, and the one with 93.7 µg OTA kg -1 (Matrix B) contained 11.2% moisture. Falcon tubes containing 2 g of each reference material were prepared in triplicate for non-irradiated control (0 kGy) and irradiated samples (gamma radiation doses of ≈2, 10 and 30 kGy) and each moisture content (≈11%, 15%, 20% and 35%) to be tested. The moisture of the reference materials was adjusted by adding H 2 O dd to the tubes, and the final moisture content of the samples was confirmed by using the moisture analyser mentioned before. Wine and grape juice samples were supplemented with OTA standard at a concentration 20 and 100 µg l -1 . For each one, falcon tubes containing 10 ml of sample were prepared in triplicate to be irradiated at the same doses of wheat. After being prepared, the samples were stored at -20 °C until they could be irradiated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!