The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ne per nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagent

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, Japan, Switzerland, United Kingdom, France, Lithuania, Sweden

The NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents are a set of buffers designed to facilitate the isolation of nuclear and cytoplasmic protein fractions from eukaryotic cells. The reagents enable the separation of these cellular compartments, allowing for further analysis or study of the extracted proteins.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

1 681 protocols using ne per nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagent

1

Rat Ovarian Tissue Subcellular Fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rat ovarian tissues from each group were measured at 20 mg in a 1.5 ml tube and diluted in 100 μl of CERI solution (NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with phosphatase inhibitor. Tissues were vortexed and incubated on ice at 10 min. Five microliters of CERII solution (NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was diluted in tubes. After vortexing, the samples were placed on ice for 1 min and centrifuged (~ 16,000 g) for 5 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant (cytoplasmic) was transferred to clean prechilled tubes. Pellets were suspended in 50 μl of NER solution (NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The samples were on ice and vortexed for 15 s every 10 min for a total of 40 min. Then, the samples were centrifuged at maximum speed (~ 16,000 g) in a microcentrifuge for 10 min. The supernatant (nuclear extract) fraction was transferred to clean prechilled tubes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Subcellular Protein Fractionation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins were extracted using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, H9C2 cells were harvested with trypsin-EDTA and lysed in CER. After centrifuging at 15,000 rpm for 5 min, the supernatant was collected as a cytosolic fraction. The remaining pellet was suspended in NER, and the supernatant was collected as nuclear fraction.
Mitochondria were isolated by cell mitochondrial isolation kit (Beyotime). In brief, after lysing and centrifuging at first time, the cell-debris pellet in the collection tube was used to extract nuclear protein, the supernatant was transferred to a new microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged at 16,000 g for 10 min, the remaining pellet was suspended with lysis buffer as mitochondrial protein. Nuclear protein was extracted using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nrf2 and NF-κB Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless otherwise noted, analytical chemicals were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Antibodies to Nrf2, NF-κB p65, and lamin B1, and β-tubulin were from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA). TriZol reagent, NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents, Reverse Transcription kit, SYBR Green PCR master mixture, and RPMI 1640 cell culture medium were from Thermal Fisher Scientific Inc. (Thermal Fisher, Rockford, IL). NF-κB SN50 inhibitor was from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA). Nrf2 siRNA, negative control siRNA and Nrf2 primers were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX). Nucleofactor Kits for THP-1 was purchased from (Lonza, Rockland, ME).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Nrf2 and NF-κB Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless otherwise noted, chemicals were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Antibodies to Nrf2, NF-κB p65, and lamin B1, and β-tubulin were from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA, USA). TRIzol reagent, NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents, Reverse Transcription kit, SYBR Green PCR master mixture, and RPMI 1640 cell culture medium were from Thermal Fisher Scientific Inc. (Thermal Fisher, Rockford, IL, USA). NF-κB SN50 inhibitor was from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting for CRC-SC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-cell lysates of CRC-SC were prepared using a ice-cold modified RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 250 mMNaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) containing a mixture of protease and phosphatase inhibitors or NE-PER nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagents (Termo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) to separate cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions. Protein content of the extracts was determined using protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and resolved by SDS-PAGE. Immunoblotting of Abs specific for β-arr1 (K-16: sc-9182), β-Catenin (E-5: sc-7963), tubulin (DM1A: sc-32293), MMP-2 (K-20: sc-8835), MMP-9 (M-17: sc-6841), Snail (E-18: sc-10432), vimentin (C-20: sc-7557), Histone H3 (C-16: sc-8654), PCNA (F-2: sc-25280), (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Dallas, TX, USA), HSP-70 (Enzo Life Sciences, New York, USA, ADI-SPA-812), Twist (ab50581), ETAR (ab178454), ETBR (ab39960) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), AKT (9272) pAKT (Ser-473) (9271), p44/42MAPK (9102), pp42/44MAPK (4377), cleaved-PARP (9541), non-phospho (active) β-Catenin (Ser33/37/Thr41) (4270) (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA), N-cadherin (610920), E-cadherin (610181) (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were detected using HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit Abs (Pierce, 31460) and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (ECL, Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Mature miRNA and CircRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were extracted using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Scientific). Total RNA from whole-cell lysates or the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were isolated using TRIzol (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). For RNase R treatment, 2 μg of total RNA was incubated 20 min at 37 °C with or without 3 U μg−1 of RNase R (Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI), and the resulting RNA was subsequently purified using an RNeasy MinElute cleaning Kit (Qiagen). To quantify the amount of mature miRNA, we used TaqMan MicroRNA assays (Life Technologies) and small nuclear U6B (RNU6B) RNA as an internal standard. To quantify the amount of mRNA and circRNA, cDNA was synthesized with the PrimeScript RT Master Mix (Takara, Dalian, China) from 500 ng of RNA. The real-time PCR analyses were performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara). In particular, the divergent primers annealing at the distal ends of circRNA were used to determine the abundance of circRNA. To determine the absolute quantity of RNA, the purified PCR product amplified from cDNA corresponding to the circHIPK3 sequence was serially diluted to generate a standard curve. The primers are listed in Supplementary Table 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Subcellular Fractionation and RNA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The separation of nucleus and cytoplasm fractions was performed with NE‐PER nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagents (Thermo, #78833, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Afterwards, the qRT‐PCR assay was performed to measure percentages of LINC00460, U6, and GAPDH in the nucleus and cytoplasm, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cytoplasmic Fractionation and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimulated cells and tissue samples were harvested for protein extraction and western blotting analysis with standard protocols as previously described12 (link),56 (link). Cytoplasmic fractionations were performed with NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’ s protocol. Briefly, cells were harvested, washed and pelleted. Then added ice-cold CER I to the cell pellet and incubated the tube for 10 min on the ice. After that, added ice-cold CER II to the tube and incubated for 1 min on the ice. The volume ratios of cell pellets, CER I and CER II are 10: 100: 5.5. At last, centrifuged the tube for 5 min at 16, 000 × g and transferred the supernatant to a clean pre-chilled tube. Stored this tube in −80 °C until use. The following antibodies were used: anti-GAPDH (1:10000; Genetex, Irvine, CA, USA); anti-DAPK1, anti-MLC (1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); anti-p-MLC (1:500; Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA); anti-IL-1β (1: 2000; R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany); anti-NLRP3, anti-caspase-1, anti-ASC (1:1000; Adipogen, San Diego, CA, USA)]; anti-cathepsin B (1:300; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); secondary antibodies (1:400; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, PA, USA). The intensity of protein bands was analyzed with the Image J software (NIH) and normalized to GAPDH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Extraction from Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins from PBMCs were isolated with the NucleoSpin RNA/Protein Kit (Macherey-Nagel). Nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins from transfected HEK293T cells were obtained with the NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Scientific). Concentrations were measured with Protein Quantification Kit (Macherey-Nagel).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SOX5 Protein Expression and Homodimerization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK-293 cells were plated in six-well dishes and transfected eight hours later with empty or SOX5 expression plasmid (1 μg) and FuGENE6 (3 μl, Promega). The next day, extracts were prepared using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and tested by western blotting using SOX5 antibody (1:1000) and horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000, Vector Biolabs). Signals were visualized using ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagents (Amersham). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was conducted using the same extracts, 10 fmoles [α−32P]-dCTP-labeled 2HMG probe and 1 μg poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC), as described.34 (link) Homodimerization was tested in western blots following cell extract incubation for 10 minutes with 0.01% glutaraldehyde.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!