The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using ventana bench mark xt autostainer

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Angiogenesis Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical analysis for antigens was performed on 4 μm sections using an Autostainer System (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA) and a Ventana Benchmark XT Autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ). Two antibodies were used: CD31 (Dako) and VEGF (Zsbio Commerce Store, Beijing, China). CD31 was performed to highlight endothelin, and microvascular density was determined using vessel counts [13 (link)]. The extent of VEGF staining was assessed as the percentage of positively stained cells among 500 cells and classified into 5 categories (1: 0-5%, 2: 6-25%, 3: 26-50%, 4: 51-75%, and 5: 76-100%). The intensity of VEGF staining was graded as weak (1: +), moderate (2: ++), or strong (3: +++), using an arbitrary scale. Finally, a semiquantitative “VEGF staining index” was calculated by adding the percentage expression score to the staining intensity [14 (link)]. The histological variables were assessed by a pathologist who was blinded to the clinical and endoscopic findings.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After dewaxing and rehydration, 5-μm thick paraffin sections were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) according to a previous study.27 (link)
For IF, paraffin sections were stained on a Dako Autostainer (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) with a primary rabbit polyclonal antibody and an anti-rabbit secondary antibody (details below). For IHC, paraffin sections were stained on a Ventana Benchmark XT autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA). Antigen retrieval was performed with Ventana Cell Conditioner 1 (Ventana Medical Systems) for 30 min. Sections were then incubated with the primary rabbit polyclonal antibody at 37°C for 32 min. The primary antibodies used in this study were as follows: MVH (ab27591; Abcam, Shanghai, China) at a 1:100 dilution and OCT4 (11263-1-AP; Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA) at a 1:200 dilution. The proprietary Ventana anti-rabbit secondary antibody was then applied, followed by the diaminobenzidine solution (CAS91952; MERDK, Shanghai, China) used for the staining and chromogenic reactions. All of the images were examined under a NIKON Eclipse 80i microscope (Beijing Rongxing Guangheng Technology, Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Immune Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From all included patients, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) pre-treatment biopsies were collected. Sections of the FFPE blocks were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and assessed by a dedicated head and neck pathologist (S.M. Willems) to mark representative tumor regions. For each patient, three 0.6 mm tissue cores were obtained from the assigned area of the FFPE blocks and collected in a tissue microarray (TMA). The TMA was constructed by a fully automated tissue microarray instrument, as described before [22 (link)].
TMA tissue sections (4 µm) were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies for the following antigens: CD3 (A452; 1:200; DAKO), CD4 (SP35, 1:25; Cellmarque), CD8 (CD8/144B; 1:100; DAKO), FoxP3 (236A/E7; 1:750; Abcam), PD1 (NAT105; 1:100; Abcam), and PD-L1 (SP263, Ventana RTU). Staining was performed using a Ventana Bench Mark XT Autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Trk Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4-μm TMA tissue sections with a Ventana Bench Mark XT Autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ) as described in previous reports [14 (link),15 (link)]. The following primary antibodies were tested: anti-TrkA antibody (1:100 dilution, EP1058Y, rabbit monoclonal antibody, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), anti-TrkB antibody (1:300 dilution, ab18987, rabbit polyclonal antibody, Abcam), anti-panTrk (1:100 dilution, Trk A+B+C, EPR17341, rabbit monoclonal antibody, Abcam), and p16 (E03347, mouse monoclonal antibody, RTU, Ventana Medical Systems).
Expression of Trk subtypes was analyzed according to the semi-quantitative H-score method; this method yields a total score range of 0-300 as previously described [16 (link)]. The intensity of expression was scored by cytoplasmic staining only (Fig. 1A-D). Conventionally accepted criteria were used for p16 immunohistochemistry as previously described. Positive and negative pattern is described in Fig. 1E and F respectively [17 (link)-22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tissue Microarray Immunohistochemistry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4-μm TMA tissue sections with a Ventana Bench Mark XT Autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) as described in previous reports 22 (link). The following primary antibodies were tested: c-Met (pre-dilution; clone SP44; Ventana) and p16 (RTU; Ventana). c-Met protein expression was analyzed according to the semiquantitative H-score method; this method yields a total score range of 0-300 23 (link) by multiplying the dominant nuclear staining intensity score (0, no staining; 1, weak or barely detectable membranous staining; 2, distinct brown membranous staining; 3, strong dark brown membranous staining) by the percentage (0-100%) of positive cell nuclei (Figs. 1A-D). Conventionally accepted criteria were used for p16 immunohistochemistry, and positivity was defined as the presence of strong and diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic staining in >70% of the HNSCC cells. All other staining patterns were scored as negative 24 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PD-L1 Expression Assessment in FFPE Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections of FFPE tissues were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. IHC was performed on 4-μm tissue sections using the Ventana Bench Mark XT Autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) and the SP142 antibody (dilution 1:100; Ventana). PD-L1 positivity was defined as a membranous staining intensity of ≥5%. IHC scoring was done on a 0–2 scale (0 = <5%, 1 = 5%–49%, and 2 = ≥50%) [6 (link)]. The semi-quantitative H score (maximum value of 300 corresponding to 100% of tumor PD-L1-positive cells with an overall staining intensity score of 3) was determined by multiplying the percentage of stained cells by the intensity score (0, absent; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong). Two experienced pathologists (H.S.S and Y.J.C) blinded to the patients’ clinical information examined the PD-L1 expression. For specimens with discrepant results, two pathologists re-evaluated the PD-L1 positivity status to reach a consensus after consultation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of FFPE Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) pretreatment biopsies of all included patients were collected in a tissue microarray (TMA) as described before [23 (link)]. In short, sections of the FFPE blocks were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and assessed by a dedicated head and neck pathologist (SMW) to mark representative tumor regions. For each patient, three 0.6-mm tissue cores were obtained randomly from the assigned area of the FFPE blocks and collected in a TMA. The TMA blocks were cut into 4-μm sections, which were immunohistochemically stained for CD57 (NK1; 1:20; Novocastra). Stainings were performed using a Ventana Bench Mark XT Autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Detection of TOP2A and SIRT1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the immunohistochemical detection of TOP2A and SIRT1, commercially available and validated monoclonal antibodies were used [23 (link),39 (link)] (Table 5). Antigen retrieval was carried out by heat treatment with Target Retrieval Solution Citrate (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Staining was performed on a Ventana Benchmark XT Autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) with a DAB+ Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). All slides were counterstained with hematoxylin (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). An ImmPRESS Anti-Rabbit IgG Polymer Kit was used for detection (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). To exclude unspecific staining, system controls were included. Tonsillar tissue served as a positive control for immunohistochemistry. Immunostaining of cells was evaluated and scored semi-quantitatively (0 = 0–9%, negative; 1 = 10–100%, positive) (Table 6). All immunohistochemical and pathologic evaluations were carried out independently and blinded together with an experienced pathologist with special expertise in sarcoma pathology (T.K.). In the case of discrepancy, the slides were reevaluated under a multiheaded microscope and consensus reached.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Detection of TIM-3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the immunohistochemical detection of TIM-3, commercially available and validated monoclonal antibodies were used (TIM-3 D5D5R, Cell Signaling Tech., Danvers, MA, USA). Antigen retrieval was carried out by heat treatment with Target Retrieval Solution Citrate (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Staining was performed on a Ventana Benchmark XT Autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) with a DAB+ Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). All slides were counterstained with hematoxylin (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). An ImmPRESS Anti-Rabbit IgG Polymer Kit was used for detection (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). To exclude unspecific staining, system controls were included. Tonsillar tissue served as a positive control for immunohistochemistry. The immunostaining of cells was evaluated and scored semi-quantitatively (0 = negative; 1 = ≥5% positive and weakly stained, 2 = ≥25% positive and moderately stained, 3 = ≥50% positive and strongly stained). All immunohistochemical and pathologic evaluations were carried out independently and blinded with an experienced sarcoma pathologist (T.K.). In the case of discrepancy, the slides were reevaluated under a multiheaded microscope and a consensus was reached.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of HLA-I and TILs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of HLA-I complex and its subunits were confirmed by IHC using the OPTIVIEW universal DAB kit (Ventana), the Ventana Bench mark XT autostainer (Ventana) and antibodies against HLA-ABC (EMR8-5, 1:8000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), HLA-A (EP1395Y, 1:5000, Abcam), HLA-B (1:700, Abcam), HLA-C (1:1000, Abcam) and B2M (B2M/961, 1:2000, Abcam). Immunostaining of TILs was performed with antibodies specific to CD3 (1:100; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and CD8 (1:100; Dako) using the Bond polymer kit (Leica Microsystems) and Leica BOND-MAX autostainer (Leica Microsystems). IHC of PD-L1 was performed on the Autostainer Link 48 with EnVision DAB Detection System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and 22C3 pharmDx antibody (prediluted; Dako), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!