The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tri reagent solution

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany

TRI Reagent solution is a versatile reagent used for the isolation of high-quality RNA, DNA, and protein from a variety of biological samples. It is a single-step liquid reagent designed to facilitate the extraction and purification of these biomolecules.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

49 protocols using tri reagent solution

1

RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Analysis of Islet Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Islet RNA was extracted either with the QIAGEN RNeasy Mini kit (#74106, QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA) or TRI Reagent solution (#T9424, Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was generated from 500 ng of RNA and random hexamer primers using the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit for RT-qPCR (#K1641, ThermoFisher Scientific, Scoresby, Victoria, Australia). Real-time PCR was performed in ABI Prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Life Technologies Australia Pty Ltd, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia) using specific primers (mouse sequences in Table S2 and human sequences in Table S3) and Power SYBR Green mastermix (#4367659, Life Technologies Australia Pty Ltd, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia) as previously described (Lalwani et al., 2014 (link)). Differences in gene expression were calculated using the ΔΔCT method. Primers for enterovirus (EV) mRNA targeted the highly conserved 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of the EV genome as previously described (Craig et al., 2003 (link)). Therefore, this measures viral load rather than individual translated viral RNAs. For many of the gene expression changes after viral infection, fold changes were very large (> 10-fold) and for those genes, data were log10 transformed for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Analysis of Islet Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Islet RNA was extracted either with the QIAGEN RNeasy Mini kit (#74106, QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA) or TRI Reagent solution (#T9424, Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was generated from 500 ng of RNA and random hexamer primers using the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit for RT-qPCR (#K1641, ThermoFisher Scientific, Scoresby, Victoria, Australia). Real-time PCR was performed in ABI Prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Life Technologies Australia Pty Ltd, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia) using specific primers (mouse sequences in Table S2 and human sequences in Table S3) and Power SYBR Green mastermix (#4367659, Life Technologies Australia Pty Ltd, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia) as previously described (Lalwani et al., 2014 (link)). Differences in gene expression were calculated using the ΔΔCT method. Primers for enterovirus (EV) mRNA targeted the highly conserved 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of the EV genome as previously described (Craig et al., 2003 (link)). Therefore, this measures viral load rather than individual translated viral RNAs. For many of the gene expression changes after viral infection, fold changes were very large (> 10-fold) and for those genes, data were log10 transformed for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative PCR Assay for Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from cells using TRI-reagent solution (Sigma) and treated with DNase (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific). Reverse transcription was performed using random hexanucleotides as primers and highscript reverse transcriptase (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to standard procedures. Quantitative (q) PCR was carried out using the power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Bio-Rad), according to manufacturer’s instructions. Primers specific for rat G6pd were used for normalization of the data. Primer sequences were as follows: rat Pou5f1 (5′-CCTGCAGCAGATCACTAGCAT-3′ / 5′-CACTCGAACCACATCCCTCT-3′); rat Sox2 (5′-ACCGTGATGCCGACTAGAAA-3′ / 5′-GCGCCTAACGTACCACTAGAA-3′); rat Nanog (5′-GTCTGCTACTGAGATGCTCT-3′ / 5′-ATCTGCTGGAGGCTGAGGTA-3′); rat G6pd (5′-TCCTCTATGTGGAGAATGAACG-3′ / 5′-TCATTCAGAGCTTTGCCACA-3′); rat Patz1 all variants (5′-CCAGAGCTGTGGGAAAGG-3′ / 5′-TGCACCTGCTTGATATGTCC-3′); rat Cdh1 (5′-CCTGGGACTCCAGTTACAGG-3′ / 5′-CTC.AGACCCTGTGAAAGCTGG-3′); rat Vim (5′-GAATACCGGAGACAGGTGCAG-3′ / 5′-CGGCCAATAGTGTCCTGGTAG-3′).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRI-reagent solution (Sigma) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription was performed according to standard procedures using a SensiFAST™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Aurogene, Rome, Italy). An Applied Biosystems 7900 Real-Time PCR Detection System (ABI 7900HT—Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to amplify each cDNA with iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The PCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Subsequently, the dissociation curve was calculated to verify the amplification specificity. Each amplification reaction was repeated in duplicate. Primer pairs used were as follows: PATZ1 all variants: 5′-TACATCTGCCAGAGCTGTGG-3′/5′-TGCA CCTGCTTGATATGTCC-3′; ꞵ-ACTIN: 5′-CAAGAGATGGCCACGGCTGCT-3′/5′-TCCTTCTGCATCCTGTCGGCA -3′; CDH1: 5′-GCCTCCTGAAAAGAGAGTGGAAG-3′/5′-TGGCAGTGTCTCTCCAAATCCG-3′; VIM: 5′-GACCAGCTAACCAACGACAAA-3′/5′-GAAGCATCTCCTCCTGCAAT-3′.
The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to calculate the gene expression levels [35 (link)]. Beta-ACTIN was used as the internal normalizer for gene expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Liver RNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from liver samples using guanidine isothiocynate and phenol (TRI Reagent solution, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). Briefly, 50-100 mg of the tissue was homogenized with 1 mL TRI Reagent, and then 0.2 mL of chloroform was added to the homogenate. After centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min, the RNA was precipitated from the aqueous phase by addition 0.5 mL isopropanol followed by centrifugation again at 12,000 × g for 10 min. The pellet was washed with 75 % ethanol and re-suspended in RNase-free water. The RNA then was quantified using a NanoDrop instrument (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE). The integrity of isolated RNA was confirmed using 1 % agarose gel electrophoresis with SYBR Safe™ DNA gel stain (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of TLR3 and TLR7 mRNA in PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from PBMCs was extracted using TRI reagent solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as permanufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration and purity was determined using the BioPhotometer plus (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Two µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed with Oligo (dT)18 primers using the High Capacity cDNA Archive kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). Basal expression levels of TLR3 and TLR7 mRNA in PBMC were determined using gene-specific primers and TaqMan probes (FAM-NFQ) (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA) (Table 1). qRT-PCR was performed in triplicate under the following cycle conditions, 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 95°C and 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min (Applied Biosystems 7500 Real time PCR System, Carlsbad, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying HMGA1 Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using TRI-reagent solution (Sigma) and reverse transcription was performed according to standard procedures (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). qRT-PCR analysis was performed using the following primers:

HMGA1 Fw: 5′-CAACTCCAGGAAGGAAACCA-3′;

HMGA1 Rv: 5′-AGGACTCCTGCGAGATGC-3;

β-actin Fw: 5′- CCAACCGCGAGAAGATGA-3;

β-actin Rv: 5′-CCAGAGGCGTACAGGGATAG -3.

Primers for β-actin were used to normalize qRT-PCR data. To calculate the relative expression levels we used the 2-ΔΔCT method [11 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative analysis of gene expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from T-75cm2 flasks using Tri Reagent solution (Sigma-Aldrich LLC, St Louis, Missouri). RNA quality (260/280 nm) was determined using a Nanodrop ND 1000 spectrophotometer. One microgram of total RNA was synthesized to 20 µL complementary DNA (cDNA) using the high-capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit from Applied Biosystems (Life Technologies, Saint Aubin, France) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis was performed with a QuantStudio 12K Flex Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies) using TaqMan 6 carboxyfluorescein-labeled probes and a standard thermal cycler protocol (50°C for 2 minutes before the first cycle, 95°C for 15 seconds, and 60°C for 1 minute repeated 45 times). Human TaqMan gene primers for eNOS, endothelin-1, vascular endothelial growth factor-B (VEGF-B), VEGF-receptor2 (VEGF-R2), TGF-β, copper/zinc-superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-SOD), manganese-superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and fibroblast growth factor 2 were from Applied Biosystems. Relative expression levels were calculated with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and ribosomal protein, large, P0 (RPLP0) as internal control genes, and Ct mean was used to analyze the results. Nonirradiated cells were set as 1. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Gene Expression Analysis by qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated using TRI reagent solution (Sigma) followed by the on‐column RNeasy mini kit and DNase treatment (Qiagen). cDNA synthesis was performed using the Transcription First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche). Quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed using the ABI 7900T PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The gene expression was normalized to the expression of housekeeping gene 18S. Relative fold changes were transformed using the comparative threshold cycle (CT) method (the 2‐ΔΔCT method) with the Sequence Detection System V2.4 software (Applied Biosystems). Primer sequences are provided in Supporting Information Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA Extraction and RT-PCR Analysis of GPR15/BOB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from frozen blocks of synovia using TRIreagent solution (Sigma, Poole, UK) or from isolated monocytes/macrophages using RNAqueous kit (Ambion, Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity recovered was determined by spectrophotometry and the integrity was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed using oligo(dT) primers (MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany) and MMLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Southampton, UK) at 37 °C for 1 h. The reactions were then heated to 70 °C for 5 min to inactivate the enzyme, placed on ice and 60 μl H2O was added. Appropriate dilutions of the resulting cDNA were then used for semi-quantitative PCR using specific primers for GPR15/BOB [F 5′-GTG ATG GAC CCA GAA GAA AC-3′; R 5′-GGA CAG AAG AGT AGG CAA CC-3′ (515 base pairs (bp); GenBank:NM005290); MWG Biotech]. PCR primers were run through a BLAST program to ensure gene specificity. The PCR reactions were normalised against the ribosomal RNA L27 using specific primers [F 5′-GAC GCA AAG CTG TCA TCG TG-3′; R 5′-GCA GTT TCT GGA AGA ACC AC-3′ (344 bp; GenBank:BC007273); MWG Biotech]. The annealing temperature was 57 °C for each primer pair.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!