The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany, United States, Sweden, United Kingdom

The Axioplan 2 is a fluorescence microscope manufactured by Zeiss. It is designed for high-performance fluorescence imaging and analysis. The microscope features advanced optics, illumination, and detection systems to enable detailed visualization and quantification of fluorescently labeled samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

165 protocols using axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope

1

Comparative DNA Fiber Analysis in 2D and 3D

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Classical DNA Fiber Assay: Exponentially growing cells were pulse labeled with 25 µM CldU (Sigma-Aldrich) followed by 250 µM IdU (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min each. HU (2 mM) was given for 4 h in between the labels. The cells were harvested and DNA fiber spreads were prepared and stained as described previously [65 (link)]. Fibers were examined using Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy). CldU and IdU tracts were measured using ImageJ software. At least 100 fibers per sample and independent experiment were analyzed.
Coming DNA Fiber Assay: Exponentially growing spheroids at day 3 post seeding were pulse labeled with 25 µM CldU (Sigma-Aldrich), followed by 250 µM IdU (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min each. Irradiation with 6 Gy was performed between the first and second label. Spheroids were harvested and DNA fiber was prepared using the DNA combing system of Genomic Vision. Fibers were examined using an Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy). CldU and IdU tracts were measured using Image J software. At least 100 fibers per sample and independent experiment were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Potato Leaf Microscopic Observation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Symptomatic potato leaves were removed from the plant and kept in enclosed plastic bags prior to observation. Leaves were dissected into 5 mm2 pieces with a razor blade, and were mounted on slides in 4 μl of double-distilled H2O under a 0.17 mm coverslip. Observation was made using either a Leica SP5 confocal microscope (Figure 1) or a Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope. The Leica SP5 confocal microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) was equipped with four lasers, 405 nm, multi-line Argon, 561 nM and 633 nm, and two HyD detectors. The Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope (Oberkochen, Germany) was equipped fluorescence filter sets 02 EX G365; 10 EX BP450-490,SB; and 15 EX BP 546/12. Deconvolution of confocal microscopic images was performed using Huygens STED deconvolution software (Scientific Volume Imaging, Hilversum, Netherlands). Overlay of green and red fluorescence images was performed using Leica LAS-X software. Each experiment included five leaves as biological repeats and the experiment was repeated three times with similar results observed each time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Assessing HCEnCs Proliferation Rates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proliferation rates of post-storage HCEnCs was assessed using the EdU incorporation Click-iT assay (Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s instructions and as previously described19 (link). For adherent HCEnCs, after storage they were maintained at 37 °C for 48 hours to allow recovery. Following which, they were passaged and seeded onto FNC-coated glass slides at a density of 5 × 103 cells/cm2 in M4-F99 proliferative medium for 24 hours. For suspension storage, donor matched HCEnCs were similarly seeded onto glass slides at three time points. 1) prior to storage, 2) immediately following storage, and 3) after 48 hours post-storage stabilization at 37 °C. Cells were further incubated in M4-F99 containing 10 μm EdU for an additional 24 hours. Samples were fixed in 4% PFA for 15 minutes, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 minutes and incubated in the Click-iT reaction cocktail for 30 minutes. Samples were examined with a Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany). At least 300 nuclei were examined for each experimental set.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Corneal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemistry, excised corneal samples were embedded in frozen section compounds (Surgipath; Leica Microsystems, Nussloch, Germany), and stored at −80 °C until sectioning. Serial sections of 10 µm sections were cut using a HM525 NX cryostat (Thermo Scientific) and collected on polylysin-coated glass slides (Thermo Scientific). Samples were rinsed and blocked in 5% normal goat serum in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Subsequently, samples were incubated with the primary antibodies at room temperature for 1 hour or at 4 °C overnight. The primary antibodies used were Na+/K+-ATPase and ZO-1, as well as anti-human nuclei antibodies (Merck Millipore, Massachusetts, USA). Subsequently, samples were labeled with an AlexaFluor 488 conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (2.5 µg/ml, Life Technology), mounted in Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, California, USA), and visualized using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing Tagged Proteins by IFA and WB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both IFA and WB analyses were performed as described previously (Durante et al. 2015 (link)) and the tagged proteins were visualized using primary monoclonal α-V5 (Thermo Fischer Scientific; 1:500 for IFA and 1:2,000 for WB), α-cMyc, and α-HA (both from Sigma-Aldrich; 1:2,000 for WB) antibodies, followed by secondary donkey α-mouse Alexa 488 antibody (Molecular Probes) for IFA and peroxidase-coupled rabbit α-mouse antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) for WB. Micrographs were taken with a Zeiss Axioplan-2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss) and the acquired images were processed with ImageJ software (Schindelin et al. 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

TP53 and P21 Immunofluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS, pH 7.2 at 37°C, washed in PBS and stained against TP53 (FL-393, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or P21 (EA10, Merck), both diluted 1∶100 in PBS supplied with 2% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.2% Triton X-100 (Merck). Bound primary antibodies were detected using Cy3 secondary antibodies (PA43002 respective PA43004, Amersham). Slides were mounted using Prolong Gold anti-fade with DAPI (Invitrogen). Cellular fluorescence was imaged using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Correlating UNR with Chromosomal and Transcript Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To correlate UNR association with the chromosomal content (DNA FISH) or with the poly(A) tail of mRNA (RNA FISH), sequential fluorescent labeling was performed using 6-μm tissue sections, prepared from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human Hep-3B xenografts [10 (link)]. Firstly, UNR immunodetection was performed, images were captured and coordinates of each image were recorded to ensure repositioning of the slide to the same area after FISH assay. Secondly, interphase DNA or RNA FISH detection was performed using the same slide; the images were captured using the repositioning function of the microscope (Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope, Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
DNA FISH targeted the short arm of chromosome 6 (chromosome region 6p25) (SpectrumRed probe, Abbott France, Rungis, France) and the long arm of chromosome 11 (chromosome region 11q13.3) (SpectrumGreen probe, Abbott France) and was performed as previously described [13 (link)]. RNA FISH targeting polyadenylated mRNA was also performed as described [6 (link)]. At each step, slides were mounted with Vectashield antifade medium containing 4’,6-diamidino 2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories, Laboratoires Eurobio/Abcys, Les Ulis, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Staining of NIH/3T3 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NIH/3T3 cells were plated at 2.5 × 105 cells per well in 6-well plates with coverslips and cultured for 24 h. The cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS, the cells were treated with ice-cold methanol for 10 min at −30 °C. After blocking with Blocking One Histo (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) and washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween® 20, the cells were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, Alexa Fluor® 488- or 594-conjugated secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used. Nuclei were stained using 0.1 μg/mL 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). The fluorescence was observed by a Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and a Leica TCS SP8 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Angiogenesis in Wound Healing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Healed wounds were harvested, bisected, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 12 hours at 4°C. Fixed tissue was dehydrated and embedded in paraffin blocks. 8-μm-thick sections were serially cut and incubated with a polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse anti-CD31 primary antibody (1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) overnight at 4°C, followed by Alexa Fluor 594 Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG secondary at room temperature (1:200, Invitrogen) for one hour. All samples were counterstained with DAPI. Slides were mounted with the Vectashield Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and cover-slipped. A Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope was used to image the slides (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Thornwood, NY). Quantification of fluorescence was performed by a blinded observer analyzing at least five high-powered fields per wound at 200x using ImageJ software (NIH) as previously described [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

CdtB-Induced DNA Damage Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both anti-53BP1 and anti-γH2AX originated from rabbits. To correlate 53BP1 association with γH2AX, sequential fluorescent labeling was performed using 3-μm tissue sections, prepared from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human CdtB-Hep-3B xenografts. Firstly, 53BP1 immunodetection was performed, the stained tissue section was scanned, and the coordinates of the scanned area were recorded to ensure repositioning of the slide after γH2AX labeling. Secondly, γH2AX immunodetection was performed using the same slide; the tissue section was scanned again, using the repositioning function of the microscope (Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope, Zeiss, Jena, Germany). As a result (S6 Fig), CdtB activated DNA damage signaling, detected as 53BP1/γH2AX-positive foci, showing that CdtB intoxication results in γH2AX phosphorylation and 53BP1 recruitment, as previously reviewed in [35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!