The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

49 protocols using hypersil bds c18

1

HPLC Analysis of Pharmaceuticals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC system used in this study was the Waters HPLC equipped with Alliance 2695, separations module, 2996 photodiode array (PDA) detector with Empower software and with Alliance 2695 with a 2489 UV detector. The HPLC column used in this study was the Hypersil BDS C-18, 250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm (Thermo Fisher, Thermo Technologies).
The analysis was carried out on the Hypersil BDS C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) column thermostated at 30°C. Solvent A was potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer (0.01 M KH2PO4 + 1 mL of triethylamine (TEA) pH-adjusted to 4.5 with diluted orthophosphoric acid) and solvent B was methanol. Solvent A was filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filter and degassed prior to pumping into the system along with solvent B. The mobile phase flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. The HPLC gradient program was time (min)/%B (v/v): 0/45, 18/45, 40/80, 50/80, 51/45, and 60/45. The injection volume was 10 μl. The chromatograms were recorded at 220 nm using a UV detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC Analysis of Mycotoxin Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses of mycotoxins were carried out using a SpectraSYSTEM high performance liquid chromatograph (Thermo Separation Products, Austin, TX, USA). The HPLC system consisted of a P4000 tertiary solvent pump, a vacuum degasser TSP, an AS3000 autosampler equipped with a 100-μL injection loop, and a UV6000LP diode array detector. Chromatographic separation was done on a Hypersil BDS-C18 (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, California, USA) column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) with a 10 × 4 mm (inner diameter) Hypersil BDS-C18 guard column (Thermo Finnigan, USA).
For the analysis of the agar plug extracts, a mixture of 90:10 (% v/v) water: acetonitrile was used as the mobile phase. Total analysis time was 15 min. The flowrate was 0.7 mL/min and the total run time was 15 min. Injection volume was set at 20 μL. For the analysis of the apple samples, gradient elution was employed. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% acetic acid in water and mobile phase B of 0.1% acetic acid in acetonitrile. For the analysis a linear gradient was employed, as shown in Table S1. The flowrate was 1 mL/min and the total analysis time was 27.5 min. Injection volume was set at 50 μL. Column temperature was set at 30 °C in both methods. Patulin detection was carried out at 275 nm (λmax).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optimization of HPLC Method for Drug Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During optimization of the method, various columns (Agilent C18, 200 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm; Discovery® C8, 250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm Supelco; Schimadzu Shim-pack CLC-08 150 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm; Welchrom C18, 250mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm, and Thermo Electron Corporation Hypersil BDS C18, 250mm×4.6mm, 5 μm) were tested. The well-resolved peaks of two drugs were achieved on Thermo Electron Corporation Hypersil BDS C18 250mm×4.6mm, 5 μm with acetonitrile, and 0.02M KH2PO4 buffer (65:35 v/v) with 0.1% TFA at pH 4.00.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC-UV Quantification of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the quantitative analysis of the samples, a HPLC-UV system was used (Hitachi Chromaster; Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan or Spectra System HPLC, ThermoQuest Inc., San Jose, USA). The analytical column was a BDS Hypersil C18, 3 μm, 150 x 3 mm (Thermo Scientific) combined with a pre-column (BDS Hypersil C-18, 3 μm, 10 x 4 mm). The mobile phase consisted of 60:40 % v/v AcN : H 2 O. The detection wavelength was set at 310 nm, the injection volume at 20 μL and the flow rate at 0.8 mL/min. The limit of detection (LOD) and of quantification (LOQ) were 0.01 μg/mL and 0.05 μg/mL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC-UV Quantitative Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the quantitative analysis of samples, a HPLC-UV system was used (Hitachi Chromaster; Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan or Spectra System HPLC, ThermoQuest Inc., San Jose, USA). The analytical column was a BDS Hypersil C18, 3μm, 150 x 3mm (Thermo Scientific) combined with a pre-column (BDS Hypersil C-18, 3μm, 10 x 4mm). The mobile phase consisted of 50:50 % v/v buffer (NaH2PO4, 10mM, pH=2.5) : acetonitrile. The detection wavelength was set at 220 nm, the injection volume at 50 μL and the flow rate at 1 mL/min. The LOD (limit of detection) and LOQ (limit of quantification) were 0.02 μg/mL and 0.07 μg/mL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Pharmaceutical Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Perkin Elmer, Series 200 HPLC Systems supplied with a micro-pump, an auto sampler, and a UV-detector operating at 255 nm was employed to conduct the HPLC analysis. A stainless-steel C-18 reverse-phase column (15 × 0.46 cm) packed with 5 μm particles (Hypersil BDS C18 Thermo Fisher Scientific S.p.A., Milan, Italy) was used. The mobile phase adopted was acetonitrile/water 40:60 v/v, pH 3, eluted at 1 mL/min flow rate. The sample injection volume was 5 μL, while the retention time was 9 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive LC/MS Analysis of Processed WYJ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used processed WYJ for in vitro and in vivo experiments. The compounds of processed WYJ were reduced or changed compared with the herbal plant's library. Therefore, we used LC/MS analysis to clarify the compounds of WYJ. The coupling of the UHPLC System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a binary pump, an auto sampler, a column thermostat, and DAD detector, and LTQ-Orbitrap XL (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with an electrostatic ionization source (ESI) was used For LC/MS experiments. Data was controlled and processed by Xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The column used in the LC analysis was Thermo Scientific Hypersil BDS C18 (2.1 mm 150 mm, 2.4 μm). Mobile phase A was water with 0.1% formic acid while mobile phase B was acetonitrile. The column temperature was set to 35 and the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. Elution conditions were summarized as follows: 0–3 min (5%-5%B), 3–45 min (5%∼75%B, 45–45.1 min (75%-5%B), and 45.1–50 min (5%-5%B).
The MS analysis was conducted on both the negative and positive ion modes. Flow rates of sheath gas and auxiliary gas were set at 40 Arb and 20 Arb, respectively. The capillary voltage was set to 35.0 V. The source temperature was set to 350 and the tube lens was set to 110 V. The source voltage was set to 4 kV and 3 kV in the positive and negative ion modes, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HPLC Method for Salmeterol and Fluticasone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Starting from the analytical conditions reported in literature,19 (link) the column length was decreased from 250 mm to 150 mm (Hypersil BDS C18, 5 μm, 150×4.6 mm, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) in order to improve tailing factors of the two active ingredients. A Thermo Fisher HPLC system equipped with a P4000 pump and an AS3500 autosampler were employed (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). A Thermo Scientific UV6000 PDA was set at 250 nm for SX and 238 nm for FP, while the retention time was 3.0 and 6.7 min for SX and FP, respectively. LOQ was about 0.043 μg/mL for salmeterol and 0.035 μg/mL for fluticasone propionate. The linearity of response of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate was evaluated on standard solutions in the concentration range 0.04–13 μg/mL and 0.04–90 μg/mL, respectively, with a correlation coefficient R2: ≥0.99 in both of the cases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HPLC Analysis of Pharmaceutical Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shimadzu LC-20ad prominence equipped with quaternary pump, and dual wavelength UV detector, column oven and auto sampler (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) and analytical column Hypersil BDS-C18 (3 µm, 100 mm × 4 mm) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Phenomenex, USA) were used for chromatographic separation; data acquisition and processing were accomplished with LC solution software. Syringe membrane filters 0.45 μm Millex-HN (Millipore, Bed-ford, MA, USA) for filtration of standards and samples; centrifuge, AX-320 (Tomy Seiko Co., Tokyo, Japan); vortex mixer, Vortex-Genie 2 (Scientific Industries Inc., Bohemia, New York, USA) and ultrasonic machine, B5510J-DTH (Branson, Danbury, CT) were also used. The pH values of the mobile phases were measured using a Hanna instruments pH meter (Hanna Instruments Inc., Cluj-Napoca Jud, Cluj, Romania); vacuum filtration assembly (Millipore filter cellulose nitrate gridded with 0.22 μ size and 47 mm diameter) attached with vacuum pump and glass support, NS 40/35 joints from Sigma-Aldrich (USA) were used for HPLC solvent purification. Flask (Pyrex), volumetric, class A, w/Pyrex standard taper stopper, 1 mL, Corning 5640-1 (Beijing, China) and R-100 rotary evaporator from Buchi Labortechhnik AG (Switzerland) were used for evaporation of solvents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

LC-MS/MS Quantification of Compound Permeability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Concentrations of test molecules were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Samples (10 µl) were injected directly into a Hypersil BDS C18 high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) column (30 × 2.1 mm inner diameter, 3-µm particle size, with guard column; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY) and a tandem mass spectrometer (PE SCIEX API2000 or API3000; AB SCIEX LLC, Framingham, MA). The mobile phase was 25 mM ammonium formate buffer, pH 3.5. Compounds were eluted with a linear gradient at a flow rate of 300 µl/min. Eluted compounds were ionized using an electrospray interface.
Apparent permeability was measured in both absorptive (apical to basolateral; A to B) and secretory (basolateral to apical; B to A) directions. The efflux ratio for each molecule was calculated as Papp B to A/Papp A to B. The Papp and percent recovery were calculated as Papp = (dCr/dt) × Vr/(A × CA) and percent recovery = 100 × [(Vr × Crfinal) + (Vd × Cdfinal)]/(Vd × CN), respectively, where
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!