The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Biorupter pico

Manufactured by Diagenode
Sourced in Belgium

The Biorupter Pico is a compact and efficient instrument designed for the sonication of DNA, RNA, and protein samples. It utilizes high-frequency sound waves to disrupt the molecular structure of the samples, enabling efficient sample preparation for downstream applications such as chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), DNA shearing, and protein extraction. The Biorupter Pico is a reliable and versatile tool for researchers in the life sciences field.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using biorupter pico

1

Chromatin Crosslinking and Lysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were dissolved in PBS and crosslinked in solution by using formaldehyde (1% final volume, shaking 10 min at room temperature). Glycine (0.125 M) was added to quench the reaction. Cell pellets were lysed in a volume of 110 μl using lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 1% SDS, 1× Protease Inhibitor Cocktails). Samples were sonicated using the Biorupter Pico (Diagenode) with six cycles (30 s on/30 s off). Afterward, the samples were spun at 16,200 × g for 5 min at room temperature and the supernatant was stored at −80°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ChIPseq Sample Preparation and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for ChIPseq samples were prepared and sequenced as previously described10 (link), with minor changes. The DNA was sheared using Biorupter Pico (Diagenode), 5 cycles 15 seconds on 90 seconds off. Reads were first trimmed using TrimGalore v0.6.061 , then mapped to hg19 using Bowtie2 v2.3.462 (link) with default settings. Bigwig files were generated with DeepTools v3.1.363 (link) with the following settings: minimum mapping quality of 15, bin length of 10bp, extending reads to 200bp and reads per kilobase per million reads (RPKM) normalization.
Peaks were called for all samples using MACS2 v2.1.164 (link) with default options. Overlaps between the sets of identified peaks across samples were obtained using BEDtools v2.25.065 (link). Heatmaps were generated using DeepTools63 (link) for the different sets of peaks identified in the wild type cell line, excluding those overlapping blacklisted regions of the genome (ENCODE project consortium, 2012).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ChIPseq Sample Preparation and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for ChIPseq samples were prepared and sequenced as previously described10 (link), with minor changes. The DNA was sheared using Biorupter Pico (Diagenode), 5 cycles 15 seconds on 90 seconds off. Reads were first trimmed using TrimGalore v0.6.061 , then mapped to hg19 using Bowtie2 v2.3.462 (link) with default settings. Bigwig files were generated with DeepTools v3.1.363 (link) with the following settings: minimum mapping quality of 15, bin length of 10bp, extending reads to 200bp and reads per kilobase per million reads (RPKM) normalization.
Peaks were called for all samples using MACS2 v2.1.164 (link) with default options. Overlaps between the sets of identified peaks across samples were obtained using BEDtools v2.25.065 (link). Heatmaps were generated using DeepTools63 (link) for the different sets of peaks identified in the wild type cell line, excluding those overlapping blacklisted regions of the genome (ENCODE project consortium, 2012).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Analysis by Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells for protein analysis were lysed with Pierce® IP Lysis Buffer (Thermo Scientific). Western blots were performed using 25–50 μg of protein and primary antibodies against p53 (DO‐1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:500 dilution and β‐actin (C4; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:3,000 dilution. HRP‐conjugated anti‐mouse secondary antibody (GE Healthcare) was used at 1:10,000 dilution. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using SuperSignal® West Pico Chemiluminescence Substrate (Thermo Scientific). MOLM13 cells were lysed with Biorupter Pico (Diagenode) using 30/30 s on/off for 10‐min program in Laemmli sample buffer (Bio‐Rad). Blots were probed with primary antibody against p53 (Sc‐126, DO‐1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:1,000 dilution and β‐actin (Sc‐8432, C‐1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 1:3,000 dilution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Per chromatin immunoprecipitation experiment, 5× 106dH1f cells were used. ChIP-seq assays were performed in triplicate as described
previously at the same timepoints as RNA-seq experiments23 (link). Briefly, for quantitative ChIP experiments, 4 ×
106 SF9 cells were spiked into the pool at 1:5 ratio. The cells
were then cross-linked by formaldehyde treatment, and chromatin was fragmented
to 200–300 bp by sonication using a Biorupter® Pico (Diagenode).
Each lysate was immunoprecipitated with 5 μg of primary antibody.
Purified DNA was used for library preparation using a NEBNext Ultra DNA sample
preparation kit (NEB) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
The samples were multiplexed, quantified on Tapestation (Agilent), and sequenced
on a NextSeq 500 (Illumina) platform (paired-end, 2 × 41 bp). Sequencing
depth was in excess of 20 million reads/sample, suggesting sufficient coverage.
Antibodies for the ChIP-seq experiments were: Anti-H3K27Ac (Active Motif,
39133), Anti-H3K18Ac (Abcam ab1191), Anti-H3K4me3(Merck Millipore 07-473),
Anti-H3K4me1 (Diagenode C15410194).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH = 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.1% Na-deoxycholate) with protease inhibitors was used to lyse cells. Lysates were further sonicated for 15 min with 30 sec on/off in a Diagenode Biorupter Pico to solubilize chromatin-bound proteins. Protein lysates were quantified with BioRad (500–0001EDU) Bradford reagent and loaded on SDS-PAGE gels. After transfer to nitrocellulose membranes (VWR 95040–108), the membranes were blocked with TBST (Tris buffered saline +0.1% Tween-20) and 5% milk and then incubated with antibodies overnight (see Supplementary Table 3) and detected using HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and Western Lightning® Plus-ECL, Enhanced Chemiluminescence (PerkinElmer Health Sciences, Inc., nel 105001EA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Hnf4g and Mitochondrial ETC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Hnf4g expression in WT and KO organoids: Organoid pellets were resuspended in 100 μl whole cell lysis buffer per well of a 6‐well plate (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 8, 10% glycerol, 1% NP‐40, 1 mM DTT, 1× CPI). Extracts were rotated for 1.5 h at 4°C followed by seven cycles of 30 s on and 30 s off sonication (Biorupter Pico, Diagenode). Afterward, the samples were spun at 16,200 × g for 5 min at room temperature and the supernatant was stored at −80°C. Samples were loaded on an 8% SDS–PAGE gel and afterward transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were incubated with primary antibody in 5% milk/TBST overnight at 4°C [anti‐beta actin 1:5,000 (Abcam, ab16039), and anti‐HNF4G 1:500 (Sigma, HPA005438)]. Afterward, membranes were incubated with secondary antibody [Polyclonal Swine Anti‐Rabbit Immunoglobulins/HRP 1:3,000 (Dako, P0399)] and imaged using chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher, 34580).
For mitochondrial ETC complexes: Organoids were washed once and Matrigel was mechanically removed in cold PBS. Total proteins were collected by direct lysis of organoids in Laemmli sample buffer. Proteins were run in SDS–PAGE and transferred to Polyscreen PVDF transfer membranes (PerkinElmer). Antibodies: Total OXPHOS Rodent WB Antibody Cocktail (ab110413, Abcam) and anti‐vinculin (V9131, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Hypoxia-Induced Transcription Factor Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T24 bladder cancer cells were cultured for 24 h in both 0.1% and 1% O2. The protein–DNA interactions were cross-linked using ChIP cross-link gold (Diagenode, Denville, NJ, USA) and 1% formaldehyde before lysing the cells and shearing the chromatin into 200–300 bp fragments using a Biorupter Pico (Diagenode). Antibodies against HIF1α, HIF2α, and HIF1β, and Dynabeads Protein G were used for immunoprecipitation (Supplementary Table S1). The fragments were de-cross-linked and the DNA was eluted using the phenol–chloroform method. DNA with no immunoprecipitation was processed and sequenced in parallel as the input control. A qPCR was used to validate the ChIP experiment before the samples were sequenced and mapped by the CRUK Manchester Institute core facilities. Sequencing reads for all samples underwent quality control assessment and adapter removal with FASTQC [49 ] and Trim Galore [50 ] software, respectively. Trimmed fastq files were mapped against the hg19 reference assembly using bowtie2 with 1 allowed mismatch in seed alignment (-N set to 1). Resulting SAM files were converted into BAM format with samtools. Peaks were called with MACS2 software and subsequent annotation of identified peaks was performed with Homer (v4.10) where peak-to-gene annotations used the genes nearest to the transcriptional start site.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chromatin Fragmentation and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were sonicated using a Diagenode Biorupter Pico (Diagenode; Seraing, Belgium,). Lysates were subjected to 15 cycles of sonication (30 s on, 30 s off) at a temperature of 4 °C to produce chromatin fragments of 200–600 base pairs (bp). To determine the size of the chromatin fragments, decrosslinking solution (Table S2) was produced, and lysates were incubated at 65 °C for 1 h. Remaining chromatin sample volumes were then stored at −80 °C until required for immunoprecipitation. Chromatin fragments were then purified using the MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen; Manchester, UK) and following the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Chromatin fragments were then eluted in a 10 µL elution buffer (Table S3), and the chromatin fragment size was determined using a 1.5% agarose gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of CREB on lncRNA DLX6-AS1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The enrichment of CREB in the promoter region of lncRNA DLX6-AS1 was detected by an EZ-Magna ChIP™ A/G Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Kits (Millipore, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer's description. Briefly, 1 × 10 7 cells were fixed and cross-linked by formaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min. Cells were broken by lysis buffers and sonication is performed to shear the cross-linked chromatin and protein to a suitable size (200-1000 bp fragments). The sheared DNA was sonicated for 30 cycles (10s on and 10s off) using Diagenode* Biorupter Pico (Diagenode, Belgium). Supernatant was removed after 10,000 ×g centrifuge at 4 °C for 10 min and prepared for following immunoprecipitation. Three tubes of sheared DNA were added 20 μl of fully resuspended protein A/G magnetic beads with the positive control (Anti-RNA Polymerase II), the negative control (normal Mouse IgG) and the antibody against CREB (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), respectively. After incubation overnight at 4 °C with rotation, Protein/ DNA complexes were eluted and then free DNA was reverse crosslinked from protein/DNA complexes. Subsequently, DNA was purified by using spin columns and then analyzed by qRT-PCR using specific primers for the lncRNA DLX6-AS1 gene promoter region (Table S3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!