The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Qp2010 ms

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan

The Shimadzu QP2010 MS is a high-performance mass spectrometer designed for a wide range of analytical applications. It offers accurate mass measurement and advanced data analysis capabilities to support various research and testing needs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using qp2010 ms

1

GC-MS Analysis of Essential Oil Phytochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phytochemical study of EO was characterized and identified using a Shimadzu GC system (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a BPX25 capillary column with a 5% diphenyl and 95% dimethylpolysiloxane phase (30 m, 0.25 mm, and 0.25 m) and coupled to a QP2010 MS. The mobile phase was helium gas (99.99%) at a flow rate of 1.69 L/min. The injection, ion source, and interface temperatures were set to 250 °C, while the temperature program for the column oven was set to 50 °C for 1 min before being heated to 250 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and maintained for an additional minute. The sample components were ionized in the Electron Ionization (EI) mode at 70 eV and a scanned mass range of 40 to 300 m/z. Each extract was administered in a 1 µL volume in the split mode. The compounds were identified by comparing their retention durations, mass spectra fragmentation patterns, and databases such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) database. LabSolutions (version 2.5, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to process the data [61 (link),62 (link),63 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Allyl Isothiocyanate in Wasabi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The AITC concentration in wasabi (powder) was determined according to the method described by Kumagai et al. (1994) (link) and Shin et al. (2004) (link) using PITC as an internal calibration standard with some modification. Briefly, wasabi extract (in ethanol) was subjected to the analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS). AITC concentration was measured by using split quantitative gas chromatography (Shimadzu GC-17) equipped with an SHRXI-5 ms capillary GC-column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) and a mass spectrometer (Shimadzu QP2010-MS). The initial column oven temperature was held at 50°C for 1 min and increased to 200°C at a rate of 10°C/min. The final hold time was 3 min producing 19-min chromatograms. The temperature of the injection port and detector were kept at 220°C. The carrier gas was 53.5 kPa high purity helium (50 ml/min total flow, 1.0 ml/min column flow, 36.3 cm/s linear velocity, 3.0 ml/min purge flow). Initial experiments confirmed the absence of PITC in wasabi extract allowing its use as an internal standard for quantitative analysis of AITC. Qualitative identification of other compounds present in the chromatogram was achieved using the NIST08 mass spectrum library.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

GC-MS Analysis of Essential Oil Phytochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phytochemical study of EO was characterized and identified using a Shimadzu GC system (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a BPX25 capillary column with a 5% diphenyl and 95% dimethylpolysiloxane phase (30 m, 0.25 mm, and 0.25 m) and coupled to a QP2010 MS. The mobile phase was helium gas (99.99%) at a flow rate of 1.69 L/min. The injection, ion source, and interface temperatures were set to 250 °C, while the temperature program for the column oven was set to 50 °C for 1 min before being heated to 250 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and maintained for an additional minute. The sample components were ionized in the Electron Ionization (EI) mode at 70 eV and a scanned mass range of 40 to 300 m/z. Each extract was administered in a 1 µL volume in the split mode. The compounds were identified by comparing their retention durations, mass spectra fragmentation patterns, and databases such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) database. LabSolutions (version 2.5, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to process the data [61 (link),62 (link),63 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fatty Acid Profiling of Capsella bursa-pastoris

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In accordance with the protocol described in Loukili et al. [109 (link)] with some modifications, methyl esters of hexane fatty acids and ethyl acetate were extracted from G. bursa-pastoris. The characterization and identification of fatty acids were analyzed using the Shimadzu GC system (Kyoto, Japan), which was equipped with a BPX25 capillary column with a 5% diphenyl and 95% dimethylpolysiloxane phase (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm) and connected to a QP2010 MS. Helium gas (99.99%) was used as the mobile phase with a flow rate of 3 L/min. The temperature of the injection, ion source, and interface was set at 250 °C, while the temperature program for the column oven was set to 50 °C for 1 min and then heated to 250 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and maintained for an additional minute. The ionization of the sample components was performed in Electron Ionization (EI) mode at 70 eV, with a scanned mass range of 40 to 300 m/z. A 1 μL volume of each extract was injected in split mode, and each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The compounds were characterized by comparing their retention times, mass spectra fragmentation patterns, and databases, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s database (NIST). Data processing was carried out using LabSolutions (version 2.5, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

GC-MS Analysis of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extracts of CS and CM were dissolved in hexane. The separation and identification were performed on a Shimadzu GC system (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a BPX25 capillary column with 5% diphenyl and 95% dimethylpolysiloxane phase (30 m × 0.25 mm inner diameter × 0.25 μm film thickness), coupled to a QP2010 MS. Pure helium gas (99.99%) was used as a carrier gas with a constant flow rate of 3 mL/min. The injection, ion source, and interface temperatures were all set at 250°C. The temperature program used for the column oven was 50°C (held for 1 min), heated to 250°C at 10°C/min, and held for 1 min. The ionization of the sample components was done in the EI mode (70 eV). The mass range scanned was 40–300 m/z. 1 μL of each prepared extract diluted with an appropriate solvent was injected in a splitless mode (split ratio 90 : 1). All samples were analyzed in triplicate. Finally, compounds were identified by comparing their retention times with those of authentic standards and their mass spectral fragmentation patterns with those found in databases or those stored on the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 147, 198 compounds. LabSolutions (version 2.5) was used for data collection and processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

GC-MS Analysis of Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Shimadzu GC system (Kyoto, Japan) with a BPX25 capillary column with a 95 percent dimethylpolysiloxane diphenyl phase (30 m 0.25 mm ID 0.25 m film thickness) and an MS QP2010 was used for separation and identification. As a carrier gas, pure helium (99.99 percent) was employed at a constant flow rate of 3 mL/min. The mass range studied was 40 to 300 m/z, and 1 L of each produced oil was fed into the chamber and diluted with an appropriate solvent. A total of 1 μL of each prepared oil diluted with an appropriate solvent was injected in the fractionation mode (fractionation ratio 90:1). Samples were evaluated three times. Finally, the compounds were recognized by comparing their retention times to verified standards, and their mass spectrum fragmentation models to those found in databases or on NIST compounds. Data were collected and processed by using Laboratory Solutions (v2.5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Qualitative and Semi-Quantitative Analysis of PVEO via GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis of PVEO was conducted using a gas chromatograph with a mass spectrometer detector, as previously described in [46 (link)]. A Shimadzu GC system from Kyoto, Japan was utilized in combination with an MS QP2010 (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Kyoto, Japan) to identify and separate compounds. Separation was achieved using a BPX25 capillary column with a 95 percent dimethylpolysiloxane diphenyl phase with a 30 m length, 0.25 mm internal diameter, and 0.25 m film thickness. Pure helium (99.99 percent) was used as the carrier gas, at a constant flow rate of 3 mL/min, and the injection, ion source, and interface temperatures were fixed at 250 °C. The column furnace was programmed to increase from 50 °C (for 1 min) to 250 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min, maintaining the temperature for 1 min. Sample components were ionized in EI mode at 70 eV, and the mass range studied was 40 to 300 m/z. Each produced oil was fed into the chamber at 1 L, diluted with an appropriate solvent. Then, 1 μL of each prepared oil was injected in fractionation mode (fractionation ratio 90:1). Three evaluations were conducted per sample, and compounds were identified by comparing the retention times to verified standards and mass spectrum fragmentation models found in databases or on NIST compounds. Laboratory Solutions (v2.5) was used to collect and process data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optimized LCM Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on preliminary screening results, the total amount of LCMs
extracted from LL was significantly higher than those extracted from
SP and LGP. Therefore, the extraction of LCMs from LL was conducted
following the previously published ultrasonic-enhanced extraction
method,2 (link) and preparations of LCM extracts
from the SP and LGP were conducted using a simple solvent-washing
method.5 (link),9 (link) The detailed procedures are provided in
Text S1 of the Supporting Information (SI).
The determination of 64 target LCMs was conducted by gas chromatography
(GC, 2010, Shimadzu) combined with a mass spectrometer (MS, QP2010,
Shimadzu) in the election impact (EI) mode, and the quantification
was performed through selective ion monitoring (SIM) mode based on
the retention time, selected ion fragments (m/z), and their relative abundance ratio. A DB-5HT column
(30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.1 μm, J&W Scientific) was
employed for separation. High-purity helium was used as carrier gas
at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The injector, ion source, and interface
temperatures were 290, 280, and 290 °C, respectively. The GC
oven temperature profile was programmed as follows: 40 °C for
1 min, increased to 210 °C by 40 °C/min, increased to 225
°C by 3 °C/min, increased to 300 °C by 15 °C/min,
and hold for 10.25 min. The optimized analytical parameters for 64
target LCMs are listed in Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

GC-MS Analysis of Microbial Volatiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Volatiles were collected at different time intervals after culture inoculation (1, 4, 8, and 12 days) using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) sorbent [48 (link)]. Two to three 5 mm PDMS tubes were carefully mounted on sterile metal wires imbedded in the PDA. The headspace sampling time was 2 h for all experiments unless otherwise indicated. After sampling, the tubes were placed in 1.5 mL brown glass vials and stored at −20 °C for analysis.
Volatiles collected on PDMS tubes were analyzed using a GC-2010 plus gas chromatograph coupled to a MS-QP2010 quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with a TD-20 thermal desorption unit (Shimadzu, Japan) and a GC Cryo-Trap (Tenax®). A single tube was placed in a 89 mm glass thermal desorption tube and desorbed at a flow rate of 60 mL min−1 for 8 min at 200 °C under a stream of N2 gas. The desorbed substances were focused in a cryogenic trap at −60 °C. The Tenax® adsorbent was heated to 230 °C and the analytes were injected using split mode (1:50) onto a Rtx-5MS GC column (thickness—0.25 µm, length—30 m, film diameter—0.25 µm) using helium as carrier gas. Separation, detection, and data analysis were identical to those reported for the quantitative analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Shimadzu 2010 (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) gas chromatograph was equipped with a split-splitless auto-injector (model AOCi) and an auto sampler (model AOC-20i), and a MS-QP 2010 (Shimadzu) series mass selective detector was used for sample analysis. The analytical conditions were as follows: GC: column, Rtx-5MS (30.0 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm; J&W, Palo Alto, CA, USA); carrier gas, helium; flow rate, 1.01 ml/min; column temperature, 40 °C held for 2 min, then at the rate of 6 °C / min to 180 °C (held for 2 min), and 15 °C/min to 270 °C. MS: analytical mode, full-scan; mass range, m/z 50-400.
Identification of volatile compounds. Retention indices (RI) were calculated based on retention times of n-alkanes, which were injected after volatiles under the same conditions. Relative contents were calculated based on GC peak areas without correction factors. The volatile compounds were identified by comparing mass spectral data with those of authentic samples in a mass spectra library (Turbo Mass ver. 5.4.2, NIST11), and the compounds were confirmed by comparing RI values with published data (Davies 1990; Farag 2008; (link)Abdallah et al. 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!