The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultimate xb c18 column

Manufactured by Hill-Rom
Sourced in United States, China, Japan

The Ultimate XB-C18 column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of organic compounds. It features a silica-based stationary phase with C18 bonded ligands, which provides excellent retention and selectivity for non-polar and moderately polar analytes. The column is suitable for use in various HPLC applications, such as pharmaceutical analysis, environmental monitoring, and food processing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

31 protocols using ultimate xb c18 column

1

Isolation and Purification of Ilicicolin Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The supernatant of the fermentation broth (300 mL) was extracted with ethyl acetate, and the mycelia was extract with methanol. The combined crude extract was analyzed by HPLC with a Ultimate XB-C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 mm × 250 mm; Welch, Shanghai, China) with a linear gradient from 75% to 25% B/A in 20 min (phase A: H2O; phase B: ACN). The culture broth of a scaled-up culture (5 L) was extracted with ethyl acetate and mycelia was extract with methanol. The combined crude extract was fractionated by normal phase chromatography on a prepacked silica cartridge (Haiyang Chemical, Qingdao, China, 200–300 mesh) using petroleum ether, ethyl acetate and methanol as mobile phase. The fractions were then purified by Semi-preparative HPLC on Ultimate XB-C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm; Welch) to get Ilicicolin J (3 mg) and Ilicicolin H (1 mg). The HPLC analysis of ilicicolin H and ilicicolin J transformation was done with slightly different conditions, with isocratic elution of 90% B/A (phase A: H2O; phase B: ACN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Structural Elucidation of Natural Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical rotations were recorded using MCP 200 Polarimeter (Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria). Optical density (OD) values were read on a Multiskan Spectrum Microplate Reader (Thermo Scientific Inc., Shanghai, China). CD spectra were acquired on a Chirascan Spectrometer (Applied Photophysics Ltd., Surrey, UK). IR spectra were carried out on a Nicolet Nexus 670 spectrophotometer, in KBr discs. NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker AVANCE 400 (Bruker Co. Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on pre-coated silica gel GF-254 plates (Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) and column chromatography (CC) was performed over silica gel (Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China, 200–300 mesh) on a Sephadex LH-20 (GE healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Semi-preparative HPLC was performed on a Waters 1525 system using a semi-preparative Ultimate XB-C18 column (5 μm, 21.2 mm × 250 mm; Welch) coupled with a Waters 2998 photodiode array detector (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). ESIMS data were measured on a Thermo LCQ DECA XP plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All reagents and solvents were of commercial quality.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UPLC-DAD Analysis of Dried Herbal Ingredients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DHI modified samples were diluted to 1:5 v/v with 0.5% aqueous formic acid, and then filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane filter before injection. UPLC analyses were carried out by using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 series UPLC system coupled with a diode array detector (DAD). The chromatographic fingerprints were obtained from a Welch Ultimate XB-C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm). The gradient elution was performed as previously described by using acetonitrile (A) and water with 0.5% formic acid (B) at the flow rate of 1 mL/min44 . The program was as follows: 0–15 min, 2–10% (A); 15–20 min, 10–17% (A); 20–45 min, 17–28% (A); 45–48 min, 28–60% (A). An aliquot of 5 μL of each sample solution was injected into the UPLC–DAD system and detected at 288 nm. Peak areas were calculated with a Chromeleon 6.8 Chromatography Data System (Dionex) and cluster analysis of the nine DHI samples was conducted in SPSS 18.0 based on the peak areas. The clustering method was between-groups linkage, and the distance calculating method was Pearson’s correlation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Quantification of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After fermentation in a 500 mL volume for 6 days, standard sieves (100 mesh) were used to collect the XAD-16 resins and were washed several times using deionized water. Then, after drying at 30 °C, the resins were incubated with 100 mL of ethyl acetate at 30 °C and 200 rpm for 24 h. The extract liquor was filtered through a 0.22 μm organic filter membrane, centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min, diluted 5- or 10-fold, and analysed by HPLC. HPLC was performed in a 1260 Infinity system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) with an Ultimate XBC18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5-μm particle diameter; Welch, Shanghai, China). Test samples were separated at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1 and a temperature of 30 °C. The injection volume was set at 10 μL each time, and the sample was monitored at 249 nm. After equilibration of the column with 35% solution A (ultrapure water with 0.2% acetic acid) and 65% solution C (methanol), the samples were separated on a gradient starting at 65% solution C for 5 min, increasing to 75% at 15 min, increasing to 80% at 25 min, and ending at 40 min. Standard samples of 2.5 mg L−1, 5 mg L−1, 7.5 mg L−1, 12.5 mg L−1, 15 mg L−1, 20 mg L−1, and 25 mg L−1 were also analysed to generate the standard curve (Additional file 1: Figure S11).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Acid-Activated Montmorillonite-Borohydride Adsorption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mt was activated by 5% H2SO4 for 0.5 hours at 70°C.24 After the exchange of interlayer metal ions with H+, Mt was ultrasonically treated for 5 minutes to obtain ultrafine montmorillonite treated with acid (acid-Mt) particles. Then, the acid-Mt was centrifuged and washed with deionized water until the pH was equal to 7.0. The solids were dried at 100°C and crushed.
One gram acid-Mt and 3 g BH were added to 1,000 mL deionized water, and the adsorption process was carried out in a water bath (50°C) for 6 hours. After washing, centrifuging, and drying, solid products of Mt-BH were obtained. DL% (Q) was determined with HPLC (Agilent 1200; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using Equation 1:
Q=(C0C)×VBHMacid-Mt×100% where C0 and C (mg·mL−1) are the BH concentrations before and after DL into acid-Mt, respectively, Macid-Mt (mg) is the mass of acid-Mt, and VBH (mL) is the volume of the BH solution.
The HPLC conditions were as follows: the BH concentration was determined by HPLC. Ultimate® XB-C18 column (Welch, Austin, TX, USA; 4.60×250 mm, 5 μm) was used. The mobile phase was acetonitrile/trimethylamine (30/70, v/v) with pH 3.0. The detector wavelength, flow rate, column temperature, and injection volume were 275 nm, 1 mL·min−1, 25°C, and 20 μL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Chemical Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC analysis was performed using Agilent1260 with UV detector, and chromatographic separations were conducted on a Welch ultimate XB-C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm). The solvent system was a gradient of mobile phase: soln. A: 0.1% phosphate in H2O; soln. B, acetonitrile. The following gradient was used: 0–30 min, 87% A; 30–50 min, 87% A to 80% A; 50–70 min, 80% A to 60% A; 70–80 min, 60% A to 87% A; 80-90 min, 87% A. Operating conditions were as follows: flow rate, 1.0 mL/min; column temp., 30°C; injection volume, 20 μL; UV detection at 350 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of Quercetin and Catabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After MSCs were thawed in a 37°C water bath, 20 µL of sample was pipetted by automatic sampler and analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The compounds were separated on an analytical Welch Ultimate XB–C18 column (4.6×250 mm i.d., 5 µm; Welch, Shanghai, China) using a binary gradient delivered by a LC-20AT low-pressure gradient HPLC pump (SHIMADZU, Japan) with acetonitrile as solvent A and 0.1% v/v formic acid water solution as solvent B for the detection of quercetin and its catabolites: 0.01 min, 5% A; 10 min, 10% A; 50 min, 50% A; 65 min, 90% A; 70 min, 90% A; 73 min, 5% A. The flow rate was 0.6 mL/min. Data acquisition was carried out with the software Classic-VP Chromatography Workstation (SHIMADZU, Japan). A diode array detection SPD-M20A plus was applied over the wavelength range of 220–600 nm for peak detection. Compounds were identified by comparison of the UV spectra and the retention times. The following wavelengths were monitored for quantitative analysis: 360 nm for quercetin, 280 nm for metabolites (12 (link), 13 (link)).
The fermentation products separated by the HPLC were used for the further experiment. Those components at new peaks were collected and analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS) (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), and the chromatographic scans of selected multiple reaction monitoring ions (MRM) were used for further identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HPLC-ELSD Analysis of TCDCA Conversion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TCDCA conversion and TUDCA yield were detected using HPLC-ELSD. The HPLC analysis was performed with a Waters Acquity SQD (Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a 150 × 2.1 mm, 3 μm Welch Ultimate XB-C18 column. The injection volume was 5 μL. Two solvents (A: 100% methanol; B: 50 mM aqueous ammonium acetate solution) were used at a constant flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1. Elution was performed using a linear gradient from 60 to 90% A for 15 min, from 90 to 60% A immediately, and then held constant for 10 min. The ELSD detection temperature was 80 °C. The detection was carried out in nitrogen environment and the speed of nitrogen was 3.0 L min−1.21
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation of Natural Products from Bacterial Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The strain expressing the AO-ampBC construct was cultured in a CD-starch medium (3.0 L) at 28 °C and 220 rpm for 5 days. The culture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 3.0 L). The crude extract was subjected to silica column chromatography eluted with CH2Cl2-methanol (v/v, 100:10). The fraction was purified by RP-HPLC using 55% methanol in water, a flow rate of 3 mL/min, a Welch Ultimate® XB-C18 column (10 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm, Welch) to afford three white solids 1 (10 mg), 2 (15 mg), and 3 (14 mg).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Entrapment Efficiency and Drug Loading of Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Entrapment efficiency and drug-loading rate The entrapment efficiency (EE%) and drug-loading rate (DL%) of BH-Mt/CS NPs were determined by dynamic dialysis technique. In brief, 2 mL of BH-Mt/CS NPs dispersions (2.8 mg·mL−1) were loaded in a dialysis bag with a molecular weight of 12–14 kDa and then immersed in 35 mL normal saline (NS) with a stirring of 120 rpm·min−1 at 34°C. At 25 min (free drug molecules were dialyzed completely), 5 mL of release medium was withdrawn, and the BH concentration was determined by HPLC (Agilent 1200, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Ultimate® XB-C18 column (Welch, 4.60×250 mm2, 5 µm) was used, and the mobile phase was acetonitrile/trimethylamine (30/70, v/v, pH 3.0). The detector wavelength was 275 nm. The flow rate, column temperature, and injection volume were 1 mL·min−1, 25°C, and 20 µL, respectively. The HPLC method was validated with respect to linearity, repeatability, and the limit of quantitation and limit of detection. The EE% and DL% of BH-Mt/CS NPs were calculated according to the Equations (1) and (2), respectively:
Encapsulation efficiency(%)=Total amount of BHFree BHTotal amount of BH×100
Drug loading capacity(DL%)=Total amount of BHTotalweightofNPs×100%
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!