The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Critical point dryer

Manufactured by Tousimis
Sourced in United States

The Critical Point Dryer is a laboratory instrument used to prepare samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. It operates by replacing the liquid in a sample with a supercritical fluid, typically carbon dioxide, and then slowly releasing the pressure to remove the fluid without damaging the sample's structure.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using critical point dryer

1

SEM Imaging of Fixed Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM samples were prepared following the method described in Landis et al. (2012) (link). Fresh tissues were collected and fixed using the same method as above. Samples were dehydrated, processed in a Tousimis critical point dryer (Rockville, Maryland, USA), and sputter-coated using a Denton Desk V sputter coater (Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, New Jersey, USA). Samples were then imaged using a Hitachi S-4000 FE-SEM (Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bacterial Ultrastructure Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An aliquot of bacterial culture growing statically was carefully pipetted and gently placed onto a Sterlitech PETE membrane filter and incubated for 2 hours without disturbance or vacuum, allowing the bacteria to settle on the substrate and maintain the structural integrity of the fine fimbriae. The samples were covered to prevent contamination and drying out. The samples were then fixed in a cocktail of 4% formaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M cacodylate buffer and subsequently post-fixed using a 1% osmium tetroxide solution. They were then dehydrated in a series of graded alcohols ranging from 35% to 100% with the final dehydration completed using a Tousimis (Rockville, MD) critical point dryer. The dried samples were then coated with a thin layer of iridium using an EMITECH K575X high-resolution sputter coater and imaged with the Zeiss 450 FE-SEM (Oberkochen, DE) at 1.50kV using the InLens SE detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEM Imaging of Bacterial Ultrastructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM studies were undertaken at the Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis at the University of Queensland. Bacterial strains were cultured in THY medium to mid-exponential phase and treated with PBT2 (6 µM) and ZnSO4 (500 µM) for up to 24 h at 37°C. Bacteria were washed twice preceding glutaraldehyde fixation followed by secondary fixation in 1% osmium tetroxide. Samples were then dehydrated via a series of ethanol treatments and were applied to coverslips coated with poly-l-lysine (1 mg/ml) before being dried in a critical point dryer (Tousimis) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Coverslips were attached to stubs with double-sided carbon tabs and coated with gold using a sputter coater (SPI) following manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were imaged in a JEOl JSM 7001F or JEOl JSM 7100F field emission SEM at an accelerating voltage of 1 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Effects of Green Plum Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The same S. aureus and E. coli strains were grown for 7 h in tryptone soy yeast extract broth (TSYEB) at 37 °C. A total of 75 µL of concentrated green plum flesh water extract in 20% ethanol (from approximately 130 mg DW of flesh powder) was added to 1 mL bacteria and broth samples, and 75 µL of 20% ethanol was added to the controls, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The samples and controls were washed three times in sterile phosphate buffered saline and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde. They were adhered to poly-l-lysine-coated (1 mg/mL) coverslips and dehydrated in ethanol before being dried in a critical point dryer (Tousimis Research Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA). Coverslips were attached to stubs with double-sided carbon tabs and coated with gold before samples were imaged using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on a Jeol Neoscope JCM 5000 (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Coral

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Infected coral fragments, and also cultured R. reptotaenium (clumps), were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and maintained at 4 °C until processing. After fixation, fragments were dehydrated through a graded series of alcohol by placing them for 10 min in ethanol at concentrations of 20, 40, 60, 70, 90 (one wash each) and 100% (three washes). Fragments were then freeze fractured in liquid nitrogen and dried in a critical point dryer (Tousimis, Rockville, MD, USA), after which they were affixed to an aluminum stub using carbon adhesive tape and coated with palladium/gold using a sputter coater (SPI-Module). Fragments were viewed using a JOEL JSM-5900 LV Scanning Electron Microscope (JOEL USA, Peabody, MA, USA) at Florida International University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Vascular Graft Tissue Preparation for SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each vascular graft tissue sample for SEM was prepared by the Centre for Microscopy at the University of the Free State. All samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Merck, Johannesburg, South Africa). Tissue specimens were dried using the critical point method (Tousimis critical point dryer, Rockville, MD, USA, ethanol dehydration, and carbon dioxide drying gas) and were metallized using gold (BIO-RAD, Microscience Division Coating System, London, UK; Au/Ar sputter coating @ 50–60 nm). Evaluations were performed with a Shimadzu SSX 550 scanning electron microscope (Kyoto, Japan, with integral imaging). The surface area of each specimen was examined and photographed in different positions. SEM micrographs were used to assess endothelial integrity and to evaluate the quality of the extracellular basal membrane.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Developmental Analysis of Arabidopsis Meristem

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
dtm-1, dtm-cr5, and their corresponding wild type SAMs were dissected from seedlings at different developmental stages by removing any visible leaves and examined with a stereomicroscope (M125/DFC420, Leica). For SEM and histological analysis, the dissected meristems were fixed in formalin-acetic acid-alcohol (10% formaldehyde, 5% acetic acid, and 50% alcohol by volume). The meristems were gradually dehydrated by incubation in an ethanol series (30–100%). Half of these meristem samples were used for SEM analysis and so further dried using a critical-point dryer (Tousimis, USA), before being sputter coated in gold particles. SEM images were collected using a high-resolution field emission SEM (Zeiss Merlin Compact, Zeiss or JSM-6360LV, JEOL). The other half were embedded in Paraplast (Sigma-Aldrich) for histological analysis and 8 μm sections made using a Leica microtome (Leica). The sections were briefly stained with 0.05% toluidine blue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Oregano Oil's Impact on Bacterial Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the ultrastructural changes of bacterial biofilms caused by oregano oil, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using the representative strains of P. aeruginosa IQ0042 and MRSA IQ0064. Briefly, biofilms of IQ0042 and IQ0064 were grown for 24 h on sterilized squares of ACLAR 33C (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, United States), and treated for 1 h with oregano oil at 0.75 mg/ml or 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Untreated and oregano-treated biofilms were fixed at 4°C for 24 h in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 0.15% alcian blue, and 0.15% safranin O. The fixed biofilms were washed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, infiltrated with 2% osmium tetroxide for 2 h, and dehydrated to 100% ethanol. The biofilms were dried using a critical-point dryer (Tousimis Research Corporation, Rockville, MD, United States), mounted on specimen stubs, sputter-coated with 10 nm Cressington 208 platinum (Cressington Scientific Instruments, Watford, United Kingdom), and examined on a S4800 SEM (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Micrographs were acquired under high vacuum using an accelerating voltage of 3.0 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibacterial Efficacy of Terminalia ferdinandiana

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methicillin resistant S. aureus, clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, L. monocytogenes, and B. Cereus strains were grown for 7 h in tryptone soya yeast extract broth (TSYEB) at 37 °C. Methanolic ASE of T. ferdinandiana fruits and leaves were reconstituted in 75 µL 20% v/v ethanol, added to 1 mL bacteria and broth samples, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The negative control was comprised of 75 µL 20% v/v ethanol. The samples and controls were washed three times in sterile phosphate buffered saline and fixed in 3% v/v glutaraldehyde [27 (link)]. Glutaraldehyde-fixed samples were fixed again in 1% v/v osmium tetroxide and dehydrated with ethanol. Samples were adhered to coverslips coated with poly-L-lysine (1 mg/mL) and dehydrated in the same manner, before being dried in a critical point dryer (Tousimis Research Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Coverslips were attached to stubs with double-sided carbon tabs and coated with gold using a sputter coater (Agar Scientific Ltd, Essex, UK), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were imaged in a Jeol Neoscope JCM 5000 (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV and for high resolution images in a Jeol JSM 7100F (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at an accelerating voltage of 1 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!