The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Powerlab 2 25

Manufactured by ADInstruments
Sourced in Australia, New Zealand

The PowerLab 2/25 is a data acquisition device designed for recording and analyzing physiological signals. It features multiple input channels, analog-to-digital conversion, and integration with ADInstruments software for data collection and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using powerlab 2 25

1

Electroretinography Assessment in Mice and Rabbits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ERG was recorded using a gold-loop corneal electrode with a light-emitting diode (Mayo Corp., Inazawa, Japan). A reference electrode was placed in the mouth, and a ground electrode was placed in the anus (in mice) or attached to the ear (in rabbits). Stimuli were produced with a light-emitting diode stimulator (Mayo Corp.). The ERG response signals were amplified (PowerLab 2/25; AD instruments, New South Wales, Australia). In photopic ERG on mice, stimulus intensity was 10.0 and 30.0 cds/m2 and a background illumination of 30 cd/m2 35 (link). Thirty to 50 responses were averaged to obtain the final photopic ERG waveform. For scotopic ERG, rabbits were dark-adapted for more than 60 min. Stimulus intensity was 0.01 (rod response), 3.0 (mixed cone and rod response) and 30.0 cds/m2 35 (link). In order to investigate whether KUS121 affected the ERG signal, 3-month-old wild-type mice were assessed by ERG before and after daily oral administration of KUS121(ad libitum access to water containing 384.5 mg/L of KUS121 for 7 days). In the RP animal models, ERGs were recorded at 10 months (9 months after the start of treatmnet) and 19 months (6 months after the start of treatment) in rd12 mice and at 12 weeks (9 weeks after the start of treatment) in RP rabbits. The a- and b-wave amplitudes were analyzed using Chart & Scope software (AD instruments, New South Wales, Australia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Retinal Function in Ischemic Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ERG recording was performed to assess the visual function of Thy1-GFP rats 7 days after the retinal ischemic injury. Rats were dark-adapted overnight before anesthetization. ERGs were recorded using a gold loop corneal electrode with a light-emitting diode (Mayo Corp.). A reference electrode was placed in the mouth and a ground electrode was attached to the tail. Stimuli were produced with a light-emitting diode stimulator (Mayo Corp.). Full-field ERGs were recorded with a Ganzfeld sphere and with single flashes with intensities of 3 cd·s·m−2. The electroretinogram response signals were amplified, digitized at 10 kHz with a band-pass filter of 0.3 to 500 Hz, and analyzed (PowerLab 2/25; AD Instruments). The a- and b-wave amplitudes of the mixed cone and rod response (ISCEV [International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision] standard; scotopic 3.027 (link)) were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electroretinography in GLAST Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electroretinography was performed in GLAST (+/-) mice at 12 months of age. Mice were dark-adapted overnight before anesthetization. Positive threshold response (pSTR) (Saszik et al., 2002 (link)) was recorded using a gold loop corneal electrode with a light-emitting diode (Mayo Corp., Inazawa, Japan). A reference electrode was placed in the mouth and a ground electrode was inserted into the anus. Stimuli were produced with a light emitting diode stimulator (3.98 cd m−2, for 10 μsec, -4.40 log cd s m−2, Mayo Corp.). Up to 100 responses were averaged to obtain the final pSTR (PowerLab 2/25; AD instruments, New South Wales, Australia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluation of Retinal Function in rd10 Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electroretinogram recording was performed to assess the visual function of rd10 mice at ages of 21, 25, 29, and 33 days. Mice were dark-adapted overnight before anesthetization. Electroretinograms were recorded using a gold loop corneal electrode with a light-emitting diode (Mayo Corp., Inazawa, Japan). A reference electrode was placed in the mouth and a ground electrode was inserted to the anus. Stimuli were produced with a light emitting diode stimulator (Mayo Corp.). The electroretinogram response signals were amplified, digitized at 10 kHz with a band-pass filter of 0.3 to 500 Hz, and analyzed (PowerLab 2/25; AD instruments, New South Wales, Australia). The a- and b-wave amplitudes and a-wave latency of the mixed cone and rod response (ISCEV (International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision) standard; scotopic 3.0)34 (link) were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scotopic and Photopic Electroretinography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A gold-loop corneal electrode with a light-emitting diode (Mayo Corp.) was used to record electroretinography. A reference electrode was placed in the mouth, and a ground electrode was placed in the anus. A light-emitting diode stimulator (Mayo Corp.) was used to produce stimuli. Scotopic electroretinography was recorded after overnight dark adaptation with stimulus intensity of 0.01 (rod response), 3 (mixed cone and rod response), and 30 cds/m2 (McCulloch et al., 2015 ). Photopic electroretinography was recorded with stimulus intensity of 3, 10, and 30 cds/m2 and a background illumination of 30 cd/m2 (McCulloch et al., 2015 ). The electroretinography response was amplified (PowerLab 2/25; AD instruments), and up to 4 responses were averaged in scotopic electroretinography, and 30 to 50 responses were averaged in photopic electroretinography, to obtain the final electroretinography waveform. The stimulus interval was set at ≥15 seconds for scotopic 0.01 electroretinography, ≥60 seconds for scotopic 3 and 30 electroretinographies, and at 1.0 second for photopic electroretinographies. Chart & Scope software (AD instruments) was used to analyze the amplitudes of the a-wave, which has been reported to reflect rod function (Hood and Birch, 1990b (link)) and the b-wave, which has been reported to derived from bipolar cells (Hood and Birch, 1996 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Auditory Brainstem Response in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were anaesthetised by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg), and placed into a sound-isolated chamber. Subcutaneous needle electrodes were inserted into the pinna and vertex, with a ground electrode near the hip. Responses to click stimuli and tone pip stimuli at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 32 kHz were recorded using a Power Lab 2/25 (AD Instruments, Sydney, Australia) and TDT Auditory Workstation (Tucker-Davis Technologies, Alachua, FL, USA). The duration of tone bursts was 1 msec. The sound level was raised in 5-dB steps from 0 dB to 100 dB. Overall, 500 responses were amplified and averaged. The threshold level was determined as the point above which any wave could be detected. All ABR were measured blinded to mouse genotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Measuring NO Release with GSNO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amount of NO released following addition of NO donor S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) to our experimental buffer (KRH; see below) was measured using an Apollo 1000 Free Radical analyser with an ISO-NOPF100 NO microsensor (1 mm) (World Precision Instruments, USA). The sensor was calibrated with S-nitroso-N-Acetyl-D,L-Penicillamine (Toronto Research) in 0.1 M CuCl2 solution 22 (link). Data were acquired using a Powerlab 2/25 and recorded in LabChart 8.1 (ADInstruments, New Zealand).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Auditory Brainstem Response Measurement in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The details of the ABR test and the method have been reported previously22 (link). We injected ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) into the peritoneal cavity of mice and put mice into a sound isolation chamber. Subcutaneous needle electrodes were inserted in the pinna and vertex, with a ground electrode near the tail. Responses to tone pip stimuli were recorded at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 32 kHz, intensities ranging from 0 to 100 dB-SPL instep of 5 dB, in 8–10-week-old mice using a Power Lab 2/25 (AD Instruments, Australia) and a TDT Auditory Workstation (Tucker-Davis Technologies, Alachua, Florida, USA). The duration of tone bursts was 1 ms. We amplified and averaged 500 responses. All ABRs were measured without knowing the profiles or genotypes of the mice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nitric Oxide Release Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amount of NO released following addition of NO donor S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) to our experimental buffer (KRH; see below) was measured using an Apollo 1000 Free Radical analyser with an ISO-NOPF100 NO microsensor (1 mm) (World Precision Instruments, USA). The sensor was calibrated with S-nitroso-N-Acetyl-D,L-Penicillamine (Toronto Research) in 0.1 M CuCl2 solution 22 (link). Data were acquired using a Powerlab 2/25 and recorded in LabChart 8.1 (ADInstruments, New Zealand).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Photopic ERG Response Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ERG using a gold-loop corneal electrode with a light-emitting diode (Mayo Corp., Inazawa, Japan) was performed54 . A reference electrode was placed in the mouth, and a ground electrode was placed in the tail. Stimuli were produced with a light-emitting diode stimulator (Mayo Corp.). Then, the ERG response signals were amplified (PowerLab 2/25; AD Instruments, New South Wales, Australia). The photopic ERG responses of b-waves elicited by light at an intensity of 30 cds/m2 were recorded at 2 weeks after NaIO3 administration. B-wave amplitudes were analyzed using Chart & Scope software (AD Instruments).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!