The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Whatman paper no 42

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

Whatman paper No. 42 is a type of filter paper commonly used in laboratories. It is designed for general filtration applications, providing reliable and consistent performance.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using whatman paper no 42

1

Nitrogen Mineralization in Leaf Litter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaves litter was incubated with earthworms at 25°C, and nitrogen mineralization was measured at 0, 7, 15, 30, 45, 75, and 105 days. Five grams of litter were put in a plastic bottle, then added with a 50 ml 2 M KCl solution and shaken for an hour. The solution was filtered with Whatman paper no.42, and the aliquot was analyzed to determine ammonium (NH4 + ) content by using the indophenol blue method (Bolleter et al, 1961) (link). Nitrate (NO3 -) was measured using a derivative spectrophotometric method (Lastra, 2003) , in which 0.1 g of the litter passing of 40 mesh strainer was saturated with 10 ml of distilled water and heated at 45°C using a water bath for an hour then filtered using Whatman paper no.42 until clear extract was obtained. As much as 0.1 ml of clear extract was put into a test tube, and 0.4 ml of salicylic acid solution was added and allowed to stand for 20 minutes at room temperature. A total of 9.5 ml of 2N NaOH was added slowly and directly measured using spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 388 nm.
The potential of N mineralization was calculated by the kinetic approach of the Zero order, First order, and Secondorder models (Stanford & Smith, 1972) . Nitrogen mineralization was N that was mineralized in time (t), N0 was the potential for mineralized N, and k was the rate of mineralization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Endophytic Bacillus Strains Solubilize Fe-P

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four endophytic Bacillus strains, B1920, B1923, B2084, and B2088, previously isolated from maize sap, roots, and leaves,21 were analyzed for Fe-P solubilization in liquid culture. The strains were reactivated on PDA plates (200 g L−1 of potato, 20 g L−1 of dextrose and 15 g L−1 of agar), using the method of streaking for obtaining pure colonies. One colony of each strain was transferred to trypticase soy broth, incubated overnight at 28 °C and subsequently 5 × 107 cells mL−1 of the bacterial suspension was transferred, in triplicate, to 100 mL of National Botanical Research Institute's phosphate growth (NBRIP) medium22 (link) supplemented with FePO4 (5 g L–1) and incubated at 28 °C for 9 days at 120 rpm. After incubation, the cultures were centrifuged at 5000 × g for 10 min, the supernatant was filtered using Whatman no. 42 paper, the soluble P concentration was determined,23 and the pH was measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Heavy Metal Analysis in Soil and Biota

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the heavy metals on all soils used for the current experiments, a sample of 5.0 g of an air dried and ground soil were sieved and placed in an Erlenmeyer flask and a volume of 20 mL extracting solution containing 0.05 HCl and 0.025 H2SO4 was added to each sample and placed in a mechanical shaker for 15 min before filtered through Whatman (No. 42) paper in a 50 mL volumetric flask and the volume was completed to 50 mL with extracting solution (Elmer, 1996 ). On the other hand, 1.0 g of dried earthworm powder and tilapia muscle samples were weighed and placed in a porcelain crucible and ashed in a muffled furnace at 500 °C for 8 h. Then the ashes were cooled and dissolved in 5 mL of 20% HCl. The mixtures were filtered through an acid washed filter paper into a 50 mL volumetric flask and the volume was completed to 50 mL with deionized water and mixed well. For quantitative measurements of Cd2+, Cr2+, Pb2+ and Zn2+ an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (A.A.S. 3110 Model, 210 VGP Buck scientific) was used according to the manufacturer protocol. Metal concentrations expressed as mg/L were measured according to Perkin Elmer Manual (1996 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Analysis of Root Exudates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The supernatant containing the root exudates was filtered through Whatman No. 42 paper, pH adjusted to 6–7, and concentrated using a vacuum manifold and Strata-X-AW 33 μm Polymeric Weak Anion-Exchange tubes (Phenomenex, USA). Each Strata column was activated with 6 mL of methanol followed by 6 mL of Milli-Q water. Samples (approximately 220 mL) were added to the columns and the vacuum was applied to pull the liquid through the columns and bind the organic acids, with a rate of application such that individual drops came off of the column at approximately 1 drop per second. After sample application, the columns were washed with 2 × 5 mL of 25 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6–7) and the vacuum was applied until all liquid had entered the column and it appeared dry. Organic acids were subsequently eluted from the columns using 2 × 5 mL of 5% ammonium hydroxide dissolved in methanol. The samples were evaporated until dry using a Labconoco RapidVap™ N2 Evaporation System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), resuspended in 5 mL of 10 mM KCl, and analyzed using ion chromatography (IC; DIONEX ICS-2000 employing suppressed conductivity detection with an AS18 column; Thermo Fisher Scientific, ON, Canada). Organic acid elution times were compared to standards for formate, malate, oxalate, succinate, and tartrate [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RDS Aqua Regia Digestion Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RDS samples were digested in a mixture of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid (molar ratio of 3:1, aqua regia) per the ISO-11466 method (ISO, 2000) . This type of digestion was performed in 250-mL glass beakers covered with watch glasses. A thoroughly mixed RDS sample of 3.00 g was digested in 28 mL of aqua regia on a hot plate for 3 hours at 110 °C.
After evaporation to near dryness, the RDS sample was diluted with 20 mL of 2% (V/V with H2O) nitric acid and transferred to a 100-mL volumetric flask after filtering through Whatman no. 42 paper and diluted to 100 mL with distilled water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Yogurt Physicochemical Properties Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH values of the yogurt were recorded using PM12E digital pH meter (Fan Azma Gostar). Also, TTA of yogurt was measured according to the AOAC official method and expressed as % lactic acid (AOAC, 2005).
The extent of syneresis was determined as recommended by Tamime, Barrantes, and Sword (1996). In brief, 25 g of each yogurt batches was weighted on a Whatman paper No. 42 (Whatman), which was placed on the top of a funnel. The method was based on drainage of whey separated from the gel network under the gravity force at 4°C for 2 hr. The percent of syneresis was calculated as the mass of the whey collected in a flask of known weight divided by the initial yogurt mass.
Water‐holding capacity (WHC) was measured based on the centrifugation method reported by Sahan, Yasar, and Hayaloglu (2008). For this purpose, approximately 5 g of yogurt was weighted in the test tube (Mi) and centrifuged at 3556 x g for 30 min at 10°C. The resultant supernatant was discarded, and the expelled precipitate was collected and weighed (Mp). WHC was calculated using the equation:
WHC%=1-Mp/Mi×100, where Mi and Mp were the initial weight of the sample and the final weight of the precipitate, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extraction of Compounds from Sea Cucumber

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens of the sea cucumber S.herrmanni were collected by scuba diving from the coastal waters of Hengam island, the Persian Gulf, Iran. After anaesthetizing with magnesium chloride (5%), the sea cucumbers were washed with fresh water, dissected and their body parts and organs (including body wall, digestive tract and respiratory tree) were separated (Mamelona et al. 2007 (link)). Each part was freeze-dried and grinded by an electric grain mill. Afterwards, a serial extraction was done based on the solvent polarity using n-hexane (non-polar), ethyl acetate (semi polar) and methanol (polar). About 200 g of each part was extracted serially based on increasing solvent polarity at 20–23 ℃ for 48 h in darkness. The obtained extracts were filtered through Whatman paper No. 42 for the removal of residual solids and concentrated under reduced pressure to remove the solvents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Yoghurt Physicochemical Properties Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pH indexes of the yoghurt were measured using a pH meter (Thermo Orion Model-420A′). In addition, titratable acidity (TTA) of yoghurt samples was measured by the AOAC official method and expressed as % lactic acid (AOAC, 2005 ).
The syneresis values of yoghurt samples were determined as recommended by Tamime et al. (1996) (link). Briefly, 25 g of each yoghurt batch was weighted on a Whatman paper No. 42 (Whatman) placed on the top of a funnel. Syneresis is expressed as the amount of whey separated from the samples under the force of gravity at 4°C for 2 h of drainage into a flask of known weight divided by the initial yoghurt mass.
The water holding capacity (WHC) of yoghurt samples was determined according to the centrifugation method reported by Sahan et al. (2008) (link). Briefly, each 5 g yoghurt sample was weighted in a falcon tube (Mi) and centrifuged at 3556× g for 30 min at 10°C. The resulting supernatant was discarded, and the expelled precipitate was collected and weighed (Mp). WHC was calculated using the equation:
where Mi and Mp were the initial weight of the sample and the final weight of the precipitate, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Free Fat in Powders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free fat content was quantified using solvent extraction method as per Nijdam and Langrish (24 (link)) with some modifications. A mass of 10 g powder and 100 mL petroleum ether were placed to a 250-mL flask and shaken for at least 10 times. Then, it was left to stand for 15 min and filtered through Whatman paper no. 42 (Whatman International Ltd., Kent, UK). The liquid was collected in a Mojonnier flask. The process was repeated and the total volume of the filtrate thus collected was evaporated on a heating plate. The dish was then transferred to an oven (Tempo Instruments Pvt. Ltd.) maintained at 100 °C for 1–2 h until constant mass was obtained. The mass was recorded as free fat content.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bioreduction Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bioreduction method was used to synthesize AgNPs from AgNO3 material, with Terminalia catappa leaf extract solution acting as the reduction agent. The synthesis of AgNPs with bioreductors from AgNO3 compounds, such as Terminalia catappa leaf extract solution, transforms Ag+ ions into AgO, which is stable [12 (link)]. With 100 mL of aquabidest, five grams of Terminalia catappa leaves powder were heated (boiling). After it had cooled, we filtered out the Whatman paper No.42. Following that, 20 mM AgNO3 was dissolved in 10 mL of Terminalia catappa leaf extract. We stirred the mixture at room temperature (60 min) (solution of bright purple color).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

  Request a quote for « Whatman paper no 42 »