The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Massarray genotyping platform

Manufactured by Labcorp
Sourced in United States

The MassARRAY genotyping platform is a high-throughput, cost-effective genetic analysis system. It utilizes mass spectrometry technology to accurately determine genetic variations and provide reliable genotyping results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using massarray genotyping platform

1

Genetic Variants and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Toxicity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the common genetic variants in MLH1, MSH2, MSH3, MSH4, MSH5, SAPCD1 and MSH6 were selected by Haploview (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA) using pair-wise tagging with default settings (pairwise r2 threshold = 0.8). SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 5% in the Han Chinese population were selected. Finally, Thirty-five SNPs were genotyped in the patients (Table 1). In our previous studies, the SNPs were investigated to be associated with platinum-based chemotherapy toxicity 30 (link).
ALL blood samples were collected in the morning and stored in EDTA tube. Genomic DNA was isolated using a Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and stored at -20°C before use. Genotyping was analyzed using a Sequenom Mass ARRAY Genotyping Platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA) through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Polymorphisms in CRC miRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Common polymorphisms within miRNA involved in CRC turmorigenesis or metastasis were selected in accordance with the following included criteria: (1) miRNA was reported to associate with CRC carcinogenesis and prognosis; (2) SNP was located at mature sequence of hsa-miRNA, flanking sequence of pre-, pri-miRNA which showed to be of biological function by F-SNP database (http://compbio.cs.queensu. ca/F-SNP/) [37 (link)]; (3) frequency of minor allele was more than 5% in Chinese Han population; (4) there was no or few reports between the selected miRNA and CRC risk, drug response and prognosis; (5) the reported results concerning the selected SNP were contradictory. Consequently, a total of fifteen CRC related miRNA polymorphisms were retrieved, and only six polymorphsims (rs4919510 within miR-608, rs3746444 within miR-499a, rs2910164 within miR-146a, rs41291957 within pre-miR-143, rs531564 within pre-miR-124-1, rs7372209 within pre-miR-26a-1) were selected in accordance with the criteria. Human genomic DNA was extracted from each peripheral blood sample using Tiangen kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Genotypes of all the selected SNPs were detected by PCR-based MassARRAY genotyping platform (Sequenom lnc, San Diego, USA). Meanwhile, 5% of random selected sample was tested for second time to validate the result.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genotyping of Tagging SNPs in Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was isolated from whole blood using a commercial kit (NucleoSpin, Macherey & Nagel, Düren, Germany). Genotyping of the tagging SNPs was performed by mass spectrometry using the massARRAY genotyping platform (Sequenom, Hamburg, Germany) and the manufacturer’s iPLEX software. SNPs rs849405, rs2037718, and rs10216210 resisted massARRAY multiplex assay design and were, therefore, genotyped by allelic discrimination using commercial TaqMan assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The call rates were ≥96%. The genotyping results were validated in 50 randomly selected subjects by bidirectional sequencing, and no deviations were observed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genetic Polymorphism Analysis of DNA Repair Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SNPs genotyped in our study were ERCC1 SNPs (rs2298881), ERCC2 SNPs (rs1052555, rs238406), ERCC4 SNP (rs1799801), ERCC6 SNPs (rs2228527, rs3793784), XPC SNPs (rs2228000, rs2228001), XRCC1 SNP (rs25489), XRCC3 SNPs (rs1799794, rs861539), BRCA1 SNP (rs799917), BRCA2 SNPs (rs543304,rs206118), RAD51 SNPs (rs12593359, rs1801320, rs1801321), RAD52 SNPs (rs1051669, rs7963551), POLH/POLR1C SNP (rs6941583), MAD2L2 SNPs (rs2233004, rs746218, rs2233006), NFKB1 SNPs (rs230529, rs1585215, rs4648068), NFKBIA SNP (rs2233406), TNF SNP (rs1800629), TNFRSF1A SNPs (rs4149570, rs2234649), TNFRSF1B SNP (rs1061622), and FASN SNPs (rs1140616, rs2228309, rs4246445, rs4485435). Haploview was used to choose pair-wise tagging SNPs with pair wise r2 threshold ≥0.8, and all SNPs had a minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 0.05 (Table 1).
All blood samples were collected and stored in EDTA tubes. We used a genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega) to extract genomic DNA. Genotyping of all SNPs was performed using the Sequenom MassARRAY Genotyping Platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Variants Impact CYP2C9 Enzyme Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Well-known genetic variants of the CYP2C9 gene, namely, CYP2C9*2 (Arg144Cys) and CYP2C9*3 (Ile359Leu), were selected to assess its role in SIH. These variants are known to cause amino acid substitutions in the CYP2C9 enzyme, leading to decreased enzyme activity. The genotyping of the selected variants was performed using the Sequenom MassARRAY genotyping platform at the Centre of Genomics, Rehman Medical Institute (RMI), Peshawar, via collaboration. The Sequenom MassARRAY genotyping method is a high-throughput genotyping technology that utilizes matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) to accurately and efficiently genotype genetic variations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SNP Selection and Genotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected by Haploview (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA) using pair-wise tagging with default settings (pair-wise r2 threshold = 0.8). The following SNPs were eligible for further study: SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 5% in the Han Chinese population and SNPs in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (P > 0.05).
All blood samples were collected in the morning and stored at −20°C for 4 h. Genomic DNA was isolated using a Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and stored at −20°C before use. Genotyping was conducted using a Sequenom MassARRAY Genotyping Platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HBV Genotyping by MALDI-TOF MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MALDI-TOF MS-based HBV genotyping assay started with amplification of 754 bp DNA fragment containing 12 codons: 80, 169, 173, 180, 181, 184, 194, 202, 204, 233, 236, and 250 [27 (link)–35 (link)]. The PCR reaction mixture contained (25 μl): 200 nmol/l of each primer [25 (link)], 5 μl of HBV DNA, 1x chelating buffer, 1.2 mM Mg(OAc)2, 0.2 mM dNTP and 0.5 U of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Germany). Amplification conditions of HBV pol/S region analysis are shown in Table 1.
PCR products were then purified from non-incorporated dNTPs by treating with shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP) solution (40 min at 37°C and 5 min at 85°C). The iPLEX Gold assay was done in 4 separate primer-extension reactions on the Mass Array genotyping platform (Sequenom Inc., USA) with a standard procedure following the iPLEX kit protocol (Sequenom Inc., USA). To desalt the iPLEX reaction products, a resin kit was used (SpectroCLEAN resin, Sequenom Inc., USA), then cleaned extension products were dispensed onto a 384-element SpectroChip using the Nanodispenser, and mass differences were detected with MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry). All data analyses were carried out with TyperAnalyzer Application, version 4 (Sequenom Inc., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DNA Extraction and Genotyping for AMD Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from whole blood using standardized protocols. Blood was drawn via venipuncture and DNA extraction was extracted from whole blood using the Pure Gene method and standard protocols [48 ] and frozen at –80 ºC until use. Genotyping was performed at Vanderbilt University’s Center for Human Genetics Research. The Sequenom MassARRAY genotyping platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA) was used to genotype samples at 19 common (MAF>1%) SNVs significantly associated with the risk of advanced AMD in a GWAS meta-analysis (Appendix 1) [35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!