The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using automa

1

Abdominal CT Imaging in 21OHD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients with 21OHD underwent either non-contrast (n=83) or contrast-enhanced abdominal CT (n=7) using multi-detector CT scanners (64 to 128 channels). In the control group, all patients underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT (n=270). CT scans were performed in the supine position with a scan range from the top of the diaphragm to the inferior margin of the symphysis pubis. All scans were acquired in a single breath-hold to minimize motion and misregistration artifacts. The detailed settings were as follows: collimation, 64×0.625 mm, or 128×0.6 mm; gantry rotation time, 0.5 second; pitch, 0.891 or 0.65; slice thickness, 3 mm; reconstruction interval, 3 mm; and matrix, 512×512.
Images were acquired using 80 to 120 kVp tube energy and AutomAtic tube current modulation technology available for each vendor (Care Dose 4D, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany; Dose Right and Tube Current Modulation, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands; or AutomA, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). For contrast-enhanced CT, portal phase images were obtained 70 seconds after administering the contrast medium. Iodinated contrast medium at a concentration of 350 mgI/mL was administered into the peripheral vein of the upper extremity via an AutomAtic power injector at a total dosage of 1.5 mL/kg over 30 seconds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiphasic Abdominal CT for Focal Hepatic Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From January 2012 to December 2012, consecutive participants who had undergone multiphasic abdominal CT for routine screening at a single tertiary institution were retrospectively included. For most participants, multiphasic abdominal CT was indicated for focal hepatic lesions detected on abdominal ultrasonography. Multiphasic abdominal CT was performed with 16-channel or higher CT scanners (Somatom Sensation 16, Siemens Medical Solution; LightSpeed 16, LightSpeed VCT, and Discovery CT 750 HD, GE Healthcare) using the following parameters: tube voltage, 120 kVp; effective tube current, 200 reference mAs (care dose 4D; Siemens Medical Solution) or 100–400 mA (AutomA or SmartmA; GE Healthcare); field of view, 30–40 cm; collimation, 0.31–0.75; and pitch, 0.98–1.00. Using the intravenous administration of a contrast agent at a rate of 3–4 mL/s, images obtained during the following four phases were obtained: UP, arterial phase (AP; scan delay of 20–25 seconds from the 100-HU threshold in the abdominal aorta), PVP (65–72 seconds after injection of the contrast agent), and delayed phase (DP; 3 minutes after injection of the contrast agent). Images were reconstructed using the filtered back-projection technique with the soft tissue reconstruction algorithm (B30f kernel; Siemens Medical Solution; Standard kernel, GE Healthcare) at a section thickness of 5 mm with no interslice gap.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Standardized CT Protocol for Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CTs were performed using a 16-channel or higher (LightSpeed VCT and Discovery CT 750 HD, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Somatom Definition AS+, and Somatom Definition Edge, Siemens Medical Solution, Erlangen, Germany) CT scanner with the following parameters: tube voltage, 120 kVp; effective tube current, 50–400 mA (AutomA or SmartmA; GE Healthcare) or 200 reference mAs (care dose 4D; Siemens Medical Solution); field of view, 30–40 cm; section thickness, 5 mm. Contrast agents were administered at a rate of 3–4 mL/s, and CT images were obtained, including the portal venous phase (120 s after contrast agent injection) in the craniocaudal direction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antemortem CT Scans for Clinical Necessity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antemortem CT scans were performed for reasons of clinical necessity such as for diagnosis or to ascertain the condition of hospitalized patients. All scans included at least the chest; patients were not excluded from the study if other regions of the body were scanned.
All antemortem CT studies were performed on 64-detector-row helical CT scanners (Aquilion 64, Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Ohtawara, Japan; Discovery CT750 HD and LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) in the craniocaudal direction with the patient in the supine position with both arms raised. The scan parameters were as follows: slice thickness, 5 mm; slice interval, 5 mm; rotation time, 0.5 s; and tube voltage, 120 kVp. AutomAtic tube current modulation was performed by Volume EC (Toshiba) and AutomA (GE). Images were reconstructed at 0.5 mm intervals with a 350 mm field of view and a 512×512 image matrix.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optimized CT Lung Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients were scanned with a 64-slice, high-definition CT scanner (Discovery HD 750, General Electric Healthcare). The scan range covered the whole lung, from the level of the pulmonary apex to the liver dome. All patients were required to hold their breath during the examination. Image acquisition parameters included collimation, 64×0.625 mm; slice thickness, 5 mm; pitch, 0.984; rotation time, 0.5 s; table speed, 78.75 mm/s; tube voltage, 100 kVp. Tube current modulation in the x, y, and z axes (Auto mA, GE Healthcare) was used, with a tube current range of 10–400 mA. The NI was set at 15 for group 1 as the standard protocol for a chest scan in our department. The NIs were set at 20, 30, and 40 for groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively. After each examination for the patients using NI = 40, images reconstructed with 30% ASIR were immediately reviewed by a radiologist on the operator console for image quality. If non-diagnostic images were obtained, a new study using NI = 30 was subsequently performed. This fact was mentioned in the informed consent.
A set of mixed reconstruction images with different levels of ASIR and FBP were generated, namely, 0% ASIR, 30% ASIR, 50% ASIR and 80% ASIR, in which 0% ASIR means 0% ASIR blended with 100% FBP, 30% ASIR means 30% ASIR blended with 70% FBP, etc. Therefore, each acquisition set had 4 series of images with different ASIR levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tube Current Modulation in CT Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acquisitions were performed on a 64-detector row CT scanner (Revolution GSI, GE Medical Systems). This scanner is equipped with OTCM (ODM, GE Medical Systems). OTCM constitutes a tube current modulation mode that reduces the mA when the tube travels across the anterior arch of the patient’s circumference without increasing it over the remaining lateral and posterior arches. To enable OTCM, the AutomAtic tube current modulation (ATCM) system (AutomA and SmartmA, GE Medical Systems) needs also to be activated. In head, the mA is reduced by up to 30% across 90° anterior projections, while in body, the mA is reduced by up to 40% across 180° anterior projections (Fig. 1) [18 ].

A graphical illustration of the configuration setup used in the MC simulation experiments showing the positioning of the phantom with regard to the angle of OTCM mA reduction. For head, the mA was reduced by 30% in 9 out of 36 tube positions, while for body, the mA was reduced by 40% in 18 out of 36 tube positions

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized 18F-Fluoride PET/CT Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET acquisition started 60 min after intravenous injection of 370 MBq 18F-labelled Na F (IASOflu-IASON GmbHGraz, Austria) and included 10–12 bed positions. All PET scans were acquired in 3D mode (3 min emissions per bed position) and were reconstructed by using an iterative reconstruction algorithm. CT acquisition data were optimized to obtain diagnostic CT images also with small image reconstruction thickness using the following data: 120 kV, 120–400 mA with an automatic system of dose optimisation (Auto-mA, General Electric Medical Systems), tube rotation time 0.5 s, 16 mm × 1.25 mm detector configuration, and table feed 13.75 mm per rotation. Overall, we acquired only one CT scan, obtaining two image reconstruction thicknesses 3.75 mm (for attenuation correction and anatomic localization) and 1.25 mm (for multiplanar reconstruction). No iodinated contrast medium was injected. CT acquisition was performed from the skull vertex to the distal femur, with the same field of view used for 18F-Fluoride-PET.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PET/CT Imaging Protocol for 18F-FDG Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients had undergone the standard procedure of PET/CT (PET/CT-16 slice, Discovery STE, GE Medical System, Milwaukee, WI) scanning. Patients were injected with 370 MBq of 18F-FDG and rested during the pharmacokinetics uptake period. The original data included a low-radiation dose CT scan and PET emission images. Low-radiation dose CT images were obtained with 120 kVp, variable mA with AutomA (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) technique, 1.75:1 pitch, and 3.75 mm slice thickness, which were acquired for anatomic reference and attenuation correction. PET data were acquired at the 1.5 min per field of view in 3-dimensional acquisition mode. The PET images were reconstructed by 3-dimensional iterative algorithms (VUE Point, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Standardized CT Imaging Protocol for Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CT imaging procedures were described previously [16 (link)]. Briefly, two 64-detector-row CT scanners with the same specifications (Optima CT 660 Discovery Edition; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) were used. After acquiring posteroanterior and lateral localizer images, axial CT images parallel to the orbitomeatal line were obtained in non-helical mode, covering the posterior fossa and the top of the brain. Tube current was determined by automatic exposure control (AEC) software—i.e., Auto mA and Smart mA (GE Healthcare)—to modulate radiation exposure according to the X-ray attenuation for each patient and at each imaging location [17 (link)]. The noise index was set to 4. Organ dose modulation was applied to the orbital region to reduce the radiation dose to the eye lens. [18 (link),19 (link)]. Other imaging parameters were as follows: tube voltage, 120 kV; rotation time, 1 s; beam width, 10 mm; slice thickness, 5 mm; and slice increment, 5 mm. The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) provided by the CT scanner mentioned above was recorded and analyzed as an index of the radiation dose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Optimized Brain CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The imaging procedures were as described previously [21 (link)]. Briefly, two 64-detector-row CT scanners with the same specifications (Optima CT 660 Discovery Edition; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) were used. After obtaining posteroanterior and lateral localizer images, axial CT images parallel to the orbitomeatal line were acquired in axial mode from the inferior margin of the posterior fossa to the top of the brain. The tube current was determined using AEC software (Auto mA and Smart mA; GE Healthcare), with a noise index of 4 [13 (link)]. Organ dose modulation was applied over the orbit to reduce the radiation dose to the eye lens [24 (link),25 (link)]. The other imaging parameters were as follows: tube voltage, 120 kV; rotation time, 1 s; beam collimation, 0.625 mm × 16; slice thickness, 5 mm; slice increment, 5 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!