The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jfd 300

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan

The JFD-300 is a high-performance field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) designed for advanced imaging and analytical applications. The instrument features a high-resolution electron beam column, advanced detection systems, and a user-friendly interface, enabling detailed characterization of a wide range of materials and samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using jfd 300

1

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Yeast Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were collected from the cultures in YPG and YPGAE media at the early to mid-log phase and washed two times with a 50-mM KPi buffer (pH 6.5). The cell pellets were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in the same buffer for 2–3 h. After washing two times with the buffer, the pellets were dehydrated in a series of (50–100%) ascending ethanol concentrations and then washed two times with 100% t-butyl alcohol by incubating for 1 h each at 35–37°C. Finally, the samples were immersed again in100% t-butyl alcohol, frozen, and then dried under reduced pressure at 5°C in a freeze-drying device (JEOL JFD-300). Then, the samples were coated with gold (thickness: 20 nm) using an ion-sputtering device (JEOL JFC-1500) and observed under a JEOL JSM-6100 scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo Japan) operating at 15 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For conventional SEM observations, samples were prefixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and postfixed in 1% OsO4 in the same buffer. The samples were then dehydrated using a graded series of ethanol, transferred to t-butyl alcohol, freeze-dried (JFD300, JEOL) and coated with an ultrathin layer of OsO4 (PMC-5000, Meiwa).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEM Plant Specimen Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For conventional SEM observations, plant specimens were prefixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and postfixed in 1% OsO4 in the same buffer. The specimens were then dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol, transferred to t-butyl alcohol, freeze dried (JFD300, JEOL), and coated with an ultra-thin layer of OsO4 (PMC-5000, Meiwa) (Fig 1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tissue Preparation for Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The digested samples were post-fixed for 1 hr with 1.0% osmium tetroxide, followed by
three consecutive 10-min PBS washes. Thereafter, a series of treatments and washes were
performed to obtain conductive dyeing: 1% tannic acid for 30 min, three consecutive 10-min
PBS washes, 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 hr, and three consecutive 10-min PBS washes.
Dehydration with an ethanol series was carried out for 30 min at each concentration,
followed by three consecutive 30-min dehydrations in 100% ethanol. The samples were
further treated with a mixture of 100% ethanol and t-butyl alcohol (1:1) for 30 min, and
then with only t-butyl alcohol for 30 min three times. After freezing, the samples were
freeze-dried in a freeze dryer (JFD-300; JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The samples were
ion-coated with platinum using a magnetron sputtering apparatus (JUC-5000; JEOL Ltd.). A
scanning electron microscope (JSM-5200, JEOL Ltd.) was used at an acceleration voltage of
20 kV to confirm the successful removal of the interstitial connective tissue and number
of Cp.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultrastructural Analysis of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For standard SEM observation, samples were prefixed with 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) and postfixed in 1% OsO4 in the same buffer. The specimens were then dehydrated, freeze dried (JFD300, JEOL) and ultra-thin coated with OsO4 (PMC-5000, Meiwa). For TEM to observe the surface fine structure of the samples, specimens were prefixed in 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4), and then postfixed in 1% OsO4 in the same buffer. The dehydrated specimens were embedded in an Epon–Araldite mixture. Ultra-thin sections (approximately 70 nm) were cut vertical to the surface of the sample. Sections were stained with 2% uranyl acetate followed by 0.4% lead citrate for 5 min each. To make the SSE-based NanoSuit visible, 10% platinum blue (Nisshin EM) was added to the SSE solution used to treat samples (figure 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural analysis of cherry petals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For conventional SEM observations, petals of the flowering cherry were prefixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH7.4) and postfixed in 1% OsO4 in the same buffer. The specimens were then dehydrated, freeze dried (JFD300, JEOL), and ultra-thin coated with OsO4 (PMC-5000, Meiwa). For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), specimens were prefixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH7.4), and then postfixed in 1% OsO4 in the same buffer. The dehydrated specimens were embedded in an Epon-Araldite mixture. Ultra-thin sections (approximately 70 nm) were cut (ULTRACAT OmU4, REICHERT-JUNG) vertical to the surface and were stained with 2% uranyl acetate followed by 0.4% lead citrate for 5 min each.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Morphological Analysis of Oviducal Glands

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fixed oviducal glands with or without tendrils were rinsed in 70% ethanol. Micrographs of oviducal gland and oviduct were obtained under a stereomicroscope (M165FC; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) attached to a digital camera (Wraycam-noa630; Wreymer, Osaka, Japan). Diameter of tendril was determined using a digital microscope VHX-7000 and a software package (Keyence, Osaka, Japan).
For scanning electron microscopy observation, the tendril-forming area of the oviducal gland was trimmed to an approximately 1-cm cube, dehydrated in graded concentrations of ethanol, immersed in butyl alcohol, and dried in a vacuum freeze-dryer (JFD-300; JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) overnight. Tissues mounted on a sample holder were coated with platinum palladium using an ion sputtering apparatus (E-1030; Hitachi High-Technologies Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and were observed using a scanning electron microscope (s-4800; Hitachi High-Technologies Corp.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microscopic Visualization of Fungal-Root Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melon roots were pre-inoculated with conidial suspension (1 × 108 conidia/mL) of the GFP-expressing strains by the root-dip method and planted in the soil infested with Mel02010-DsRed (1 × 105 conidia/g soil). Three plants were removed from the soil at 3 and 7 days after planting, and conidial germination and hyphal elongation on main root surface were observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) (LSM-700; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) (GFP: excitation 488 nm and emission 509 nm; DsRed: excitation 555 nm and emission 572 nm). At least six sections of the main roots of each seedling were observed, and germination rates of conidia and hyphal lengths were measured. Data were analyzed for significant differences using Tukey–Kramer’s multiple range test.
For observing hyphae on the root surface using a scanning electron microscope, sections of the main roots were fixed twice in 2% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) for 1 h and dehydrated using a graded ethanol series (20–100%), then immersed in 100% acetone. Samples were freeze-dried (JFD-300; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), coated with a thin gold layer using a JEE-400 vacuum evaporator (JEOL) and observed using a JSM-5800 scanning electron microscope (JEOL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Embryo Ultrastructure Analysis by TEM and SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transmission and scanning electron microscopy, the embryos at E9.25-E9.75 were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for at least 24 h at 4°C, and then postfixed using 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) for 1 h. For transmission electron microscopy, the embryos were postfixed with 0.5% OsO4 suspended in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) for 30 min and dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol concentrations. After passage through propylene oxide, the tissues were embedded in Epon 812. Ultrathin sections were cut, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and then observed with a transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan, JEM-1010C). For scanning electron microscopy, the specimens were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanols (50%, 70%, 90%, 99.5%, and 100%), critical-point dried with carbon dioxide using a freeze-drying device (JEOL JFD-300), mounted and then coated with gold using a sputter coater. Finally, the specimens were observed under a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-5600 LV SEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SEM Analysis of Silicate-Limited Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed and collected by the same methods used for determination of cell densities. Cells on a filter were then dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, substituted with t-butyl alcohol, and finally freeze-dried (JFD-300, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan [22] (link)). The dried cells coated with gold-palladium using an ion sputter (JFC-1500, JEOL). Samples were observed under SEM (SU1510, Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan).
For the quantitative determination of morphological changes under silicon-limitation, a hundred randomly selected cells from triplicate cultures were categorized into 4 types (see Results) by their SEM images, and then the mean percentage of each type was calculated. The data was analyzed by t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!