The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Axioscope 5 microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The Axioscope 5 is a high-performance compound microscope designed for routine microscopy applications. It features a stable and ergonomic design, with an LED illumination system that provides uniform and efficient illumination. The microscope is equipped with plan-achromatic objectives that deliver sharp, high-contrast images. The Axioscope 5 is a versatile tool suitable for a wide range of microscopy tasks.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using axioscope 5 microscope

1

Osteoclast Differentiation and Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 6 of culture, cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde, and stained with a TRAP Staining Kit following the manufacturer’s protocol. TRAP-positive (TRAP+) multinucleated cells consisting of 3 nuclei or more were considered matured osteoclasts. After staining, cells were washed with dH2O, and images were taken using a Zeiss Axioscope 5 microscope. A TRAP activity assay was performed using a TRAP staining kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendations on culture supernatant; the supernatant cultures were incubated with reaction buffers for 3 h in the dark at 37 °C, and then, read at 540 nm using a microplate reader (TECAN infinite F200 PRO, Männedorf, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological Analysis of Tissue-Biomaterial Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histological analysis was performed using an Axioscope 5 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The analyses included the observations of the tissue-biomaterial interactions, including the cell reactions as well as tissue responses involving (bone) tissue integration and vascularization. Microphotographs were taken using a scanning microscope (M8, PreciPoint, Munich, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence and Immunohistochemistry Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For IF staining, cells were grown on glass coverslips, then fixed with methanol for 5 min at room temperature. Following fixation, cells were blocked with Dako buffer (S0809, Agilent) for 1 h, and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, then with appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa 555 (red) or Alexa 488 (green) (Cell Signaling Technology). Cells were counterstained with DAPI (DUO82040, Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min and visualized by fluorescence microscopy (Eclipse-NiE NIKON microscope).
Xenografts were collected and fixed in 4% PFA prior to paraffin embedding, sectioning, staining with hematoxylin and eosin, and with immunostaining conducted as described previously [23 (link)]. Images were acquired on a ZEISS Axioscope 5 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanoparticle Diffusion in Tissue Slices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Up to 2 μl of a 1 : 1000 nanoparticle solution was placed on top of each LN slice. A coverslip was placed on the slice and stayed on by means of capillary forces. Movies were captured using a 63× objective on a ZEISS Axioscope 5 microscope and by using Zeiss software (ZEN lite) at a temporal resolution of 30 or 50 ms for 20 s. Mean squared displacement (MSD) and nanoparticle trajectory was calculated using MATLAB, with a minimum of 10 frames for each particle.21 (link) MSD was calculated using Δr2(τ) = [x(t + τ) − x(t)]2 + [y(t + τ) − y(t)]2 with at least 70 particles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparative Histology of Membrane Fragments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five- to 10-mm membrane fragments were dissected under a stereomicroscope and fixed in Davidson’s solution for 24 h before being processed using standard techniques for embedding in paraffin [33 (link), 34 (link)]. Two 5-μm serial sections were prepared [32 (link)] using a Microm HM 315 microtome (Microm, Walldorf, Germany), deparaffinized and stained on glass slides with haematoxylin–eosin [35 ].
The membrane fragments on the prepared slides were visualized with an Axioscope 5 microscope (Zeiss, Germany) and photographed with an Axiocam 506 camera system (Zeiss) for comparative histology. ZEN (blue edition) version 3.4 software (Zeiss, Germany) was used to measure the thickness of the membranes. A total of six samples were used for each membrane type [36 (link)]. The average thickness of the membranes was determined by measuring four sites in each section. Each site was continuous for at least 100 μm in length and had intact bedding [37 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Mycelial Pellet Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mycelial pellet morphology was quantitatively observed as described previously (Cairns et al., 2019b (link)) with minor modification. Briefly, the mycelial pellets of citric acid fermentation were observed using Zeiss Axioscope 5 microscope. To keep the mycelial pellet state, cultures were put on the glass slide without cover glass. For each sample, six images were captured from randomly selected. Mycelial pellet morphologies were quantified in ImageJ/Fiji using the morphology of dispersed and pelleted growth (MPD) plugin (Cairns et al., 2019b (link)). For each mycelial pellet, the following parameters were calculated: area (µm2), Feret’s diameter (maximum diameter of each structure, µm), aspect ratio (maximum diameter/minimum diameter) and solidity. Morphology numbers (MNs) were also calculated as described (Wucherpfennig et al., 2011 (link); Cairns et al., 2019b (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bacterial Adhesion Assay with rGST-On-CRP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bacteria (S. agalactiae and A. hydrophila) were prepared as mentioned above and incubated with rGST-On-CRP, GST-tag, CaCl2 or EDTA with the final concentration of bacteria at 107 CFU/mL, rGST-On-CRP and GST-tag at 2 μM, CaCl2 at 10 mM and EDTA at 20 mM. Then the solutions were incubated for 0.5 h at 25 °C, observed and photographed using a ZEISS Axioscope 5 microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Isolation and Expression Analysis from FFPE Breast Cancer Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to RNA isolation, the BC tissues were microdissected from 505 samples. Microdissection was performed by a pathologist using a Zeiss axioscope 5 microscope (Zeiss, Germany) and tumor tissue was marked with a pencil to exclude pre-existing breast parenchyma. For RNA isolation, two to four 10-μm-thick tissue slides were used. Deparaffinization of FFPE tissues was performed with 2 × xylene for 5 min, followed by incubation in 96% and 70% ethanol for 2 min each. Proteinase K digestion (Qiagen, cat#19131) was performed for up to 2 h at room temperature followed by 15 min at 80°C. RNA was isolated with a Qiagen miRNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen, cat#217504) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA expression analysis was performed using the NanoString nCounter XT Assay according to the Hybridization protocol for the nCounter XT CodeSet Gene Expression Assay (NanoString nCounter, Seattle, WA, USA) and data analysed with the nCounter Expression Data Analysis Guide (MAN- C0011–04 from 2017). From each sample, 400 ng of FFPE-derived RNA were used. All steps were performed as described in nCounter XT Assay User Manual (MAN-10023–11 from 2016). For the analysis a custom codeset design was used and all respective genes are summerized in Supplementary Table S3. The expression levels were evaluated with the NanoStringNorm (https://github.com/sgrote/NanoStringNormalizeR/) R package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying NTHi Adherence to Vitronectin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A previously established method (63 (link)) was modified to assess adherence of NTHi to a vitronectin-coated glass surface by microscopy. A solution of vitronectin (Recombinant human VTN, Gibco A14700) was prepared in 1× DPBS at the concentration of 2 μg/mL. Then, 10 μL was added as a drop onto a glass slide and allowed to dry for 30 min at room temperature. Similarly, a glass slide was coated with 1% BSA as a negative control. The slides were washed three times by dipping for 2 s in 1× DPBS to remove excess protein. Bacterial inoculum was prepared from log phase cultures of NTHi in 1× DPBS at a density of 1 × 108 CFU/mL. The coated glass slides were submerged in 10 mL of bacterial inoculum in sterile petri dishes and incubated at 37°C, and 5% CO2 for 1 h at 25 rpm. After incubation, the slides were washed three times in 1× DPBS to remove any unbound bacteria. The slides were air-dried, heat-fixed by passing over a flame, and stained with methylene blue (Epredia Shandon Kwik-Diff Stains) for 60 s. Excess stain was removed by washing gently with water. The slides were air-dried and imaged using the 20× objective of a Zeiss Axioscope 5 microscope. The images were processed using ZEN 3.0 software, and the area occupied by NTHi in each field of view was determined with ImageJ software. The experiment was carried out three times with at least five fields imaged for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Optic Nerve Ultrastructure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immediately following euthanasia, the optic nerve was removed and fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde. The nerves were then post-fixed in osmium tetraoxide and embedded into Eponate 12 resin. 1 μm thick sections of the optic nerve were taken perpendicular to the length of the nerve. Sections were then stained using 1% p-phenylenediamine (PPD) and images were taken at 100× magnification using a Zeiss Axioscope 5 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!