The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Semmes weinstein monofilaments

Manufactured by Stoelting
Sourced in United States

Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments are standardized nylon filaments used to assess tactile sensation and sensory function. They provide a quantitative and reproducible method to evaluate light touch and pressure detection thresholds.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using semmes weinstein monofilaments

1

Mechanical Pain Sensitivity in Facial Region

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mechanical pain sensitivity in the facial region was assessed as described in a previous publication (Kayser et al., 2010 (link)). Rats were stationed individually into a plastic cage to acclimatize to the testing environment. Mechanical sensitivity was assessed by applying the Von Frey filaments (VFF) between the whisker pad region and surgery site with VFF (Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments, Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.) in an increasing force order that produced a bending force between 0.6 and 15.0 g until a brisk withdrawal response was triggered. VFF testing to assess mechanical allodynia in the facial region was performed 1 day before and 4, 7, 10, 15, 21, and 30 days after surgery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Mechanical Sensitivity in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Von Frey assay was performed as previously described (Geisler et al., 2016 (link)). Briefly, mice were placed in 10 × 10 × 15 cm open Plexiglass boxes on wire mesh for 5 hours to habituate before testing. To begin, mice were stimulated with filaments (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, Stoelting) for 2 seconds in the center of the foot between the footpads starting at 0.32g of force. Subsequently, the up-down method (Chaplan et al., 1994 (link)) was used. Mice were stimulated four times after the first change in withdrawal for each foot separately. The withdrawal threshold (Dixon, 1980 (link)) was calculated and the values for each foot were averaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Vincristine-Induced Neuropathy Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy model was used in this experiment. Baseline response to mechanical stimulation of the hind paw was established on day 1. Either vincristine sulfate (Sigma Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) or saline was administered by injection to create the neuropathy model, as described previously.15 (link) In brief, 0.1 mg/kg/day vincristine was administered intraperitoneally for 5 days. Following cessation for 2 days, injection was continued for the next 5 days. On day 15, the paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) was measured with von Frey filaments (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, Stoelting Co., Wood Dale, IL, USA). If a foot withdrawal response occurred when a filament less than 0.6 g was applied to the hind paw, it was considered that mechanical allodynia had developed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mechanical Threshold Assessment in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats were maintained individually for habituation into observation cages for at least 2 hours before the test. The mechanical threshold was measured using a graded series of 8 von Frey filaments ranging from 0,04 to 8,0 g in increasing order (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL — USA) as described previously by our group.6 (link) The test consisted of three consecutive applications of each Von Frey filament into the rat’s vibrissae pad on the same side of intraoral mucosal incision or sham procedure, with an interval of 30 seconds between each application. Each stimulation series began with the filament producing the lowest force and proceeded up to the filament that evoked two positive responses, including brisk head withdrawal, facial grooming, or sharp escape or attack reactions against the filament. To avoid unspecific responses, a baseline measure was performed and only animals that did not respond to the application of the 8 g filament were included in the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Assessing Perivaginal Mechanical Sensitivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Perivaginal mechanical sensitivity was determined using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL) according to Brennan et. al 10 (link). Rats were acclimated for 30 min in a Plexiglas box on a steel mesh floor and analyses performed using calibrated touch-test sensory evaluators (monofilaments). Pressure was applied for 3–5 sec to the injected vestibular region in an upward motion starting with the monofilament of lowest force. After 3–5 min test free period, the test was repeated with increasing evaluator force until the rat responded aversively (movement or vocalization). This was repeated three times and the lowest force from 3 tests producing withdrawal response was averaged. This was defined as the mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT). Behavioral tests were performed between 8:00 and 10:00AM at 24h prior to and 1, 3 and 6d following vestibular injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Perigenital Mechanical Threshold Testing in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were acclimated to the testing room for two days prior to the assessment of perigenital mechanical threshold testing. On the day of testing, naïve and NMS mice were placed beneath individual clear plastic chambers (11×5×3.5cm) on a wire mesh screen elevated 55 cm above a table and allowed to acclimate for 1 hour prior to testing. The experimenter was blinded to the group status of the mice. The up-down method was performed to test mechanical sensitivity using a standard set of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (1.65, 2.36, 2.83, 3.22, 3.61, 4.08, 4.31, 4.74g; Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL) [18 ]. Beginning with the 3.22g monofilament, mice received a single application to the scrotum, avoiding the midline. A negative response was followed by the next larger filament and a positive response (considered a jerk or licking) was followed by the next smaller filament. The experimenter continued to move up or down the series, depending on the previously elicited response, for an additional four applications after the first positive response was observed for a minimum of five or a maximum of nine total monofilament applications. The value in log units of the final monofilament applied in the trial series was used to calculate a 50% g threshold for each mouse and group means were determined as previously described [9 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Assessing Neuropathic Pain Hypersensitivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presentation of neuropathic pain was determined by the development of hypersensitivity to mechanical and cold non-noxious stimuli. The mechanical hypersensitivity was assessed by the decrease in paw withdrawal mechanical thresholds using the von Frey test. Mice were placed in a clear plastic chamber with a wire mesh floor, which provided full access to the planter surface of the hind paws. Mice were allowed to habituate for at least 15 min before testing. The paws were touched with one of a series of 10 von Frey filaments (Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments; Stoelting Co., Wood Dale, IL) with logarithmically incremental stiffness (0.005–3.630 g) starting with the filament of 0.407 g. The 50% mechanical withdrawal thresholds were determined using the up–down method.20 (link) Cold hypersensitivity to non-noxious cold stimulus was assessed by counting the number of forepaw-shaking behavior of mice placed on a cold plate (LHP-1700CP; TECA, Chicago, IL) set at 15 °C (15 °C cold plate test) during a 2.5 min test period. The cold plate test was performed following the von Frey test. Behavioral testing was performed in a blinded manner with respect to all drug administration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Mechanical Allodynia in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Testing was conducted blind with respect to group assignment. Rats received at least three 60-min habituations to the test environment before behavioral testing. The von Frey test (Chaplan et al., 1994 (link)) was performed at the distal region of the heel in the hindpaws, within the region of sciatic innervation as previously described (Chacur et al., 2001 (link)). Assessments were made before injection (baseline), and 2, 4, 6, and 24 h after the last injection. A logarithmic series of 10 calibrated Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments (von Frey hairs; Stoelting) was applied to the hindpaw to define the threshold stimulus intensity required to elicit a paw withdrawal response. Log stiffness of the hairs ranged from manufacturer-designated 3.61 (0.40 g) to 5.18 (15.14 g) filaments. The behavioral responses were used to calculate absolute threshold (50% probability of response) by fitting a Gaussian integral psychometric function using a maximum-likelihood fitting method (Harvey, 1986 ) as described (Milligan et al., 2000 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mechanical Sensitivity Assessment in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were individually habituated in acrylic observation boxes for 2 h (from 8 to 10
a.m.) prior to the beginning of the experiment. The start time of the experiments was
defined based on previous studies, in which an improved behavioral response was observed.
Von Frey filaments (Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments, Stoelting, USA, 0.04; 0.07; 0.16; 0.4;
1.0; 2.0; 4.0, and 8.0 g) were progressively applied in the vibrissa pad skin on the right
side of the face, ipsilateral to the surgery. An experimenter blind to the animal’s
condition applied each filament three consecutive times, with an interval of approximately
3 s between each application. The response threshold to mechanical stimulation
corresponded to the filament that twice evoked rapid head withdrawal behaviors or
attack/escape reactions.4 (link)
Only rats that did not present nociceptive behavior in the pre-selection stage with
the application of all filaments were included in the experiments, so that the mechanical
threshold baseline was equal to or greater than 8.0 g.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mechanical Allodynia Assessment in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each rat was placed in a clear plastic container (16 cm [L] × 16 cm [W] × 18.5 cm [H]) atop a grid of parallel 0.2 cm stainless‐steel bars spaced 2.2 cm apart. Rats underwent a 60‐min habituation period in the testing environment for three consecutive days before von Frey testing. On the day of von Frey testing, rats were habituated for 20–30 min before testing. A modified up‐down method using a logarithmic series of 10 calibrated Semmes‐Weinstein monofilaments (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL) was applied to the hindpaw to determine the threshold stimulus intensity required to induce a paw withdrawal response.
19 (link),
35 (link),
36 (link),
37 (link),
38 (link) Log stiffness of the hairs ranged from 3.61 (0.40 g) to 5.18 (15.14 g) filaments. A cutoff of 15.14 g was used to prevent tissue damage to the hindpaw and reduce bias from the filament lifting the hindpaw. The monofilament was applied perpendicularly to the heel of the hindpaw for 5 s. Paw withdrawal was scored as a flinching response during sustained contact with the monofilament. The program PsychoFit (http://psych.colorado.edu/~lharvey) was used to calculate 50% paw withdrawal thresholds in units of log stiffness. Absolute force thresholds were calculated as: Weightg=10LogStiffness Threshold/10,000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!