The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ammoniumchloride lysis buffer

Manufactured by Lonza

Ammoniumchloride lysis buffer is a laboratory reagent used to lyse cells and extract their contents, including proteins and nucleic acids. It is a common component in various cell biology and molecular biology protocols.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using ammoniumchloride lysis buffer

1

Influenza Vaccination Immune Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of
Washington University in St. Louis. Written consent was obtained from all
participants. Eight participants who had not been vaccinated against influenza
for at least three years were enrolled, including 1 female and 7 males, aged
26–40 years old. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated
using Vacutainer CPT tubes (BD), the remaining RBCs were lysed with ammonium
chloride lysis buffer (Lonza), and cells were immediately used or cryopreserved
in 10% dimethylsulfoxide in FBS. Ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA)
of axillary lymph nodes was performed by a qualified physician’s
assistant under the supervision of a radiologist. Lymph node dimensions and
cortical thickness were measured before each FNA. For each FNA sample, 6 passes
were made using 25 -gauge needles, each of which was flushed with 3 mL of RPMI
1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, followed by
three 1 -mL rinses. Red blood cells were lysed with ammonium chloride buffer
(Lonza), washed twice with PBS supplemented with 2% FBS and 2 mM EDTA, and
immediately used or cryopreserved in 10% DMSO in FBS. Participants reported no
adverse effects of phlebotomy, serial FNA, or vaccination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Influenza Vaccination Immune Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of
Washington University in St. Louis. Written consent was obtained from all
participants. Eight participants who had not been vaccinated against influenza
for at least three years were enrolled, including 1 female and 7 males, aged
26–40 years old. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated
using Vacutainer CPT tubes (BD), the remaining RBCs were lysed with ammonium
chloride lysis buffer (Lonza), and cells were immediately used or cryopreserved
in 10% dimethylsulfoxide in FBS. Ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA)
of axillary lymph nodes was performed by a qualified physician’s
assistant under the supervision of a radiologist. Lymph node dimensions and
cortical thickness were measured before each FNA. For each FNA sample, 6 passes
were made using 25 -gauge needles, each of which was flushed with 3 mL of RPMI
1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, followed by
three 1 -mL rinses. Red blood cells were lysed with ammonium chloride buffer
(Lonza), washed twice with PBS supplemented with 2% FBS and 2 mM EDTA, and
immediately used or cryopreserved in 10% DMSO in FBS. Participants reported no
adverse effects of phlebotomy, serial FNA, or vaccination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Characterization of PBMCs and LNs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs were isolated using Vacutainer CPT tubes (BD Biosciences), the remaining red blood cells were lysed with ammonium chloride lysis buffer (Lonza) and cells were immediately used or cryopreserved in 10% dimethylsulfoxide in FBS. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of axillary LNs was performed by a qualified physician's assistant under the supervision of a radiologist. LN dimensions and cortical thickness were measured before each FNA. For each FNA sample, six passes were made using 25-gauge needles, each of which was flushed with 3 ml of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U ml -1 penicillin/streptomycin, followed by three 1-ml rinses. Red blood cells were lysed with ammonium chloride buffer (Lonza), washed twice with PBS supplemented with 2% FBS and 2 mM EDTA and immediately used or cryopreserved in 10% DMSO in FBS. Participants reported no adverse effects of phlebotomy, serial FNA or vaccination. No statistical methods were used to predetermine the sample size. Investigators were not blinded to experiments and outcome assessment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Influenza Vaccination Response in PBMC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Washington University in St Louis. Written consent was obtained from all participants. Eight participants who had not been vaccinated against influenza for at least three years were enrolled, including 1 female and 7 males, aged 26–40 years old. PBMCs were isolated using Vacutainer CPT tubes (BD), the remaining red blood cells were lysed with ammonium chloride lysis buffer (Lonza), and cells were immediately used or cryopreserved in 10% dimethylsulfoxide in FBS. Ultrasound-guided FNA of axillary lymph nodes was performed by a qualified physician’s assistant under the supervision of a radiologist. Lymph node dimensions and cortical thickness were measured before each FNA. For each FNA sample, 6 passes were made using 25-gauge needles, each of which was flushed with 3 ml of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin, followed by three 1-ml rinses. Red blood cells were lysed with ammonium chloride buffer (Lonza), washed twice with PBS supplemented with 2% FBS and 2 mM EDTA, and immediately used or cryopreserved in 10% DMSO in FBS. Participants reported no adverse effects of phlebotomy, serial FNA, or vaccination. No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. Investigators were not blinded to experiments and outcome assessment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!