The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

333 protocols using ab32072

1

Automated Quantification of c-MYC Expression in TMAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded human tissue microarrays (TMAs) were stained for c-MYC protein using the Leica Bond automated platform via a high pH pretreatment solution, followed by heating at 95° °C for 40 min and detection using the Leica Refine DAB system. The c-MYC antibody (Abcam Cat# ab 32072, RRID:AB_731658) was purchased from Abcam (ab32072, Cambridge, MA, USA) and diluted 1:100. Following immunostaining, slides were scanned using a Leica Aperio AT2 scanner (Vista, CA, USA). The digitalized slides were then imported into QuPath open-source software (Edinburgh, UK), where positive cell detection was performed on five regions of interest (ROI) with an average area of 454,614μm2. Within each ROI, a classification tool was used to discern tumor cells from stromal cells, followed by positive cell detection with a 1+ intensity threshold of 0.06. The results of the five ROI were then averaged for both cytoplasmic and nuclear positivity and compared between the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Automated Chromogenic IHC for c-Myc and EdU

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All single-plex 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) based chromogenic IHC on tissue samples (FFPE or fresh frozen) was performed on an automated Ventana Discovery ULTRA system (Roche). Fresh frozen tissues were air dried at room temperature for 15 minutes, fixed overnight in 10% neutral buffered formalin and then rinsed off with dH2O prior to staining. IHC labeling for c-Myc was performed using the DISCOVERY HQ+ Amp kit with primary antibody against c-MYC (1:600, Abcam, ab32072). IHC for EdU and MYC on cells grown on chamber slides was performed by following the protocol described before (48 (link)). A primary antibody against BrdU (Abcam, ab136650) was first validated to be specific for EdU as well, and used at 1: 1000 dilution. The primary antibody against c-MYC was used at 1:250 dilution (Abcam, ab32072). The secondary antibodies were PowerVision Poly-HRP anti-rabbit or anti-mouse (Leica, PV6114 and PV6119) and developed with DAB.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Tissue Staining and Protein Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung tissues were separated, fixed, dehydrated, embedded and cut into slices (5 µm) in sequence. After being dewaxed and hydrated, slices were stained with Wiegert's solution for 10 min and differentiated with acidic ethanol for 10 s. Subsequently, slices were treated with Masson bluing buffer for 5 min, ponceau-fuchsin solution for 10 min, phosphomolybdic acid solution for 3 min, aniline blue solution for 5 min, and weak acid solution for 30 s in turn. Finally, slices were dehydrated with 95% ethanol and absolute ethanol, transparentized with dimethylbenzene, mounted with neutral resin, and imaged under a digital trinocular camera microscope (CX23, Olympus). transferred onto a PVDF membrane (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). After being blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Solarbio) at room temperature for 1 h, membranes were hatched with primary antibodies against diverse proteins, containing p38 (1:1000, ab68515), phosphorylated p38 (p-p38, 1:2000, ab196495), β-catenin (1:1000, ab16051), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK, 1:1000, ab32072), p-JNK (1:1000, ab32072) and GAPDH (1:2500, ab9485; all from Abcam) at 4°C overnight. Membranes were then treated with corresponding secondary antibodies at room temperature for 3 h and visualized by an ECL assay (Beyotime). The gray value was calculated by QUANTITY ONE software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Expression Analysis via Immunoblotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was carried out as previously described with the following Abs: anti‐p‐ERK (4370; CST), anti‐ERK (4695; CST), anti‐TSPAN1 (ab254730; Abcam), anti‐GAPDH (ab8245; Abcam), and anti‐c‐Myc (ab32072; Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The transfected cells were lysed in lysate buffer (mixture of 50 mmol/L Tris ‐ HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5% NP‐40 and protease inhibitor) and centrifuged to move cell debris. Cleared cell lysate was incubated with 1 μg anti‐HA (ab9110, 1:70, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), myc (ab32072, 1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), USP7 (ab109109, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), KDM6B (ab38113, 1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or anti‐FLAG antibody (ab205606, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and 15 μL protein A/G beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 2 hours. After extensive washing, the beads were boiled at 100℃ for 5 minutes. Proteins were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulphate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA), followed by immunoblotting. To detect endogenous protein interactions, cells were lysed in ice‐cold lysis buffer. Cleared cell lysates were incubated with 5 μg anti‐USP7 antibody (ab4080, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and 20 μL protein A/G beads at 4°C overnight. The anti‐USP7 antibody was used to detect the endogenous KDM6B.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiplex IHC for Cell Cycle Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dual IHC staining of Ki67 (Biocare Medical, CRM325, RRID: AB_2721189), ER (Thermo Fisher Scientific RM9101S0, RRID: AB_149902), p-ER (S118; SAB 11072, RRID: AB_895302), p-CDK1 (T161; Cell Signaling Technology, CST9114, RRID: AB_2074652), p-CDK2 (T160; Cell Signaling Technology, CST2561, RRID: AB_2078685), and c-Myc (Abcam, ab32072, RRID: AB_731658) was conducted on 4-μm FFPE sections, using both Bond Polymer Refine Kit and Bond Polymer Refine Red kit in Leica Bond RX system. The slides were deparaffinized and heat-mediated antigen retrieval was performed with EDTA buffer (pH 9.0). The IHC staining was performed using the antibodies and the incubation conditions reported in Supplementary Table S8. Antigen-antibody reaction was visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen. Omission of the primary antibody was used as a negative control. Whole slide images were acquired from stained slides using a Vectra 3.0 Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging System (Akoya Biosciences) and analyzed using Halo Image Analysis platform (Indica Labs). Image annotations were performed by one research pathologist. Areas containing invasive carcinoma were included in image analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of YAP, Ki67, and c-myc

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining was performed as previously described [20 (link)]. The negative control was detected with the primary antibody replaced by PBS. Immunohistochemical staining was scored by two independent observers who were blinded to the patients’ clinical data. The scoring system for grading the level of YAP was reported previously [22 (link)]. The expression level was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) score calculated by multiplying a proportion score and intensity score. The proportion score reflected the fraction of positive-stained cells (0, none; 1, ≤ 10%; 2, 10–25%; 3, 25–50%; and 4, > 50%), and the intensity score revealed the staining intensity (0, no staining; 1, weak; 2, intermediate; and 3, strong). Finally, the total score was calculated. High and low protein expression levels were defined using the mean score of all samples as a cutoff point. With these criteria, tissue staining could be interpreted as “low” or “high.” The primary antibodies used were anti-YAP (Proteintech Group, 13584-1-AP, IL, USA), anti-Ki67 (Proteintech Group, 27309-1-AP), and anti-c-myc (Abcam, ab32072, Cambridge, UK). For hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining, fresh subcutaneous tumors isolated from mice were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and embedded in paraffin for histological examinations. Sections with thickness of 4 μm were cut and stained with H&E.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tissues and cells were lysed in the radio‐immunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Sigma–Aldrich) to collect total protein. The concentration of the isolated protein was examined using the bicinchoninic acid method. Next, an equal amount of protein sample (40 μg each lane) was separated by 10% SDS‐PAGE and loaded onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk at 4˚C overnight, and incubated with the primary antibodies against TGIF2 (1:1,000, 11522‐1‐AP; Proteintech Group, Inc., Wuhan, Hubei, China), β‐catenin (1:1,000, #13‐8400; Thermo Fisher Scientific), Wnt1 (1:1,000, #36‐5800; Thermo Fisher Scientific), c‐Myc (1:1,000, ab32072; Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA), c‐FOS (1:1,000, ab222699, Abcam), Survivin (#PA1‐16836, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and GAPDH (1:10,000; ab8245; Abcam) at 4℃ overnight. Thereafter, the membranes were incubated with HRP‐labeled goat anti‐rabbit IgG (1:5,000; ab6721; Abcam) or goat anti‐mouse IgG (1:2,000; ab6789; Abcam) at room temperature for 1.5 h. The blot bands were developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and analyzed using Image J software (Version 1.46; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of MTDH, PTEN, and AKT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was isolated from tissue samples, cells, or tumor xenografts using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) Lysis and Extraction Buffer (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Proteins were denatured, separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in a 10% gel, and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. After blockage with 5% fat-free dried milk diluted in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% of Tween 20 for 2 h, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: anti-MTDH (cat. # ab126785; dilution 1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-PTEN (ab32072; 1:500; Abcam), anti-phospho- (p-)AKT (ab181616; 1:500; Abcam), anti-AKT (ab15580; 1:500; Abcam), and anti-GAPDH (ab8227; 1:500; Abcam). A horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody (dilution 1:3,000; cat. # 7075S, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) was incubated with the membranes at room temperature for 2 h. The Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) Western Blotting Kit (Pierce Biotechnology Inc., Rockford, IL, USA) was employed for visualization of the protein signals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Glioma Prognostic Gene Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We chose the most representative genes with a positive or negative correlation with the prognosis of GBM patients as the research objects, whose IHC staining was downloaded from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA: http://www.proteinatlas.org/) and analyzed. This allowed us to assess differences in cell senescence-associated genes expression at the protein level.
We collected section from paraffin-embedded tissues of human glioma and peritumor. We dewaxed and dissociated the sections and rehydrated sections. After heating in tris-EDTA buffer, we blocked slides using 5% gout serum and incubated slides with primary antibody (PTTG1, 1:500, #ab128040; Abcam) (MYC, 1:100, #ab32072; Abcam) at 4 °C overnight. Then the slides were incubated with secondary antibody and the images were captured using a Leica DM 2500 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!