The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using microscan walkaway system

1

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of E. cloacae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The stock culture strains E. cloacae (ATCC 49141, NR1, NR2, NR3 controls and R1-, R2-, R3-resistant strains) were subcultured twice on LB agar plates and then grown on MacConkey agar plates at 37 °C for 16 h. Next, all the procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer's directions. For bacterial identification, the VITEK 2 system (BioMérieux, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France) utilized the ID-GNBcard for Gram-negative identification and the AST-N105 for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The MicroScan WalkAway system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Greenburgh, New York, NY, USA) was used with the MC50 test panel for identification and resistance detection. In relation to the clinical strains, the identification and antibiotic resistance phenotypes were analyzed by the MicroScan WalkAway system (Siemens) using an MC 42 test panel. Values outside these ranges were classified as low discrimination or unidentified organism. Regarding the AST, both automated systems calculated the MIC for each antimicrobial drug tested after incubation. The interpretative breakpoints for MIC obtained from automated systems were analyzed according to the interpretative criteria of CLSI M100-S23, 24 and the strain was classified as susceptible (S), intermediate (I) and resistant (R), according to each antibiotic tested.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Resistance Profile Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We tested the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints of 14 antimicrobial agents according to the definition of extensive drug resistance.13 (link) The MIC breakpoints of ampicillin, aztreonam, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, meropenem, imipenem, chloramphenicol, and tigecycline were determined using the MicroScan WalkAway System (Siemens, Germany). The microbroth dilution method based on the 96-well plate was used to determine the MIC value of polymyxin B. The MIC of fosfomycin was measured using the agar dilution method. The antimicrobial susceptibility results were interpreted according to CLSI 2020-M100.14 The MIC of tigecycline was interpreted using the guidelines of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (2021, https://www.eucast.org/). The E. coli ATCC25922 strain served as the quality control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacteremia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We collected 15 residual specimens of a positive blood culture bottle (BacT/Alert® FA or BacT/Alert® FN) from adult patients with bacteremia at Toyama University Hospital after the detection of bacterial growth with the BacT/ALERT 3D system (bioMerieux, Inc., Mercy-l’Etoile, France). All specimens were confirmed to be monomicrobial with Gram staining before use, because conventional antimicrobial susceptibility (and even identification) had not been completed at the time of enrollment. However, they were eventually confirmed to be monomicrobial using solid media at the Clinical Laboratory Center (certified ISO15189) at Toyama University Hospital. The MIC values determined by the conventional method, as reference values, were determined with the MicroScan WalkAway system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, IL, USA) in the clinical laboratory.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bacterial Isolate Identification and Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolates were submitted on Dorset transport media (Diagnostic Media Products, National Health Laboratory Service, South Africa) to the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), Johannesburg, South Africa. Each isolate was plated onto a 5% blood agar plate (Diagnostic Media Products, National Health Laboratory Service, South Africa) followed by organism identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using automated systems [(VITEK II system (bioMèrieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France)/MALDI-TOF MS (Microflex, Bruker Daltonics, MA, USA) and MicroScan Walkaway system (Siemens, Sacramento, CA, USA), (Gram-positive panel PM33)], respectively. An isolate was phenotypically non-susceptible if it had an oxacillin MIC of >2 and a positive cefoxitin screening result. Interpretation of susceptibility was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [17 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility of MR-CoNS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MR-CoNS isolates were identified using colony morphologic analyses, Gram staining, and catalase and coagulase testing. Isolates were identified using the MicroScan WalkAway system (Siemens, Munich, Germany) and recognized as MR-CoNS if the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of oxacillin was ≥0.5 μg/mL. Furthermore, the MICs of vancomycin (VCM), teicoplanin (TEIC), arbekacin (ABK), linezolid (LZD), and daptomycin (DAP) were determined using a dilution antimicrobial-susceptibility test in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (Eiken Chemical, Japan). To test DAP specifically, we used Mueller-Hinton broth that was supplemented with 50 μg/mL of calcium. All plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phenotypic Characterization of ESBL-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microbiology laboratories of Hospitals A-C phenotypically characterized presumed ESBL Ent isolates via the MicroScan WalkAway system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY) or by the Vitek 2 microbial identification system (bioMérieux, Athens, GA). Screening for ESBL production was based on guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and involved testing with one or more of the following agents: aztreonam, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime or cefpodoxime10 . ESBL production was confirmed on the automated instruments; by determining minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ceftazidime and cefotaxime in the presence and absence of clavulanic acid; or by disk diffusion assays (BBL; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD). A measurement of a 4-fold reduction in the MIC of ceftazidime or cefotaxime in the presence of clavulanic acid or an increase in disk zone diameter of > 5 mm served as confirmation of the ESBL phenotype10 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Quinolone-Resistant Haemophilus Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We isolated H. haemolyticus (strain identification 2019-19) from the suction sputum and identified it as quinolone-resistant H. influenzae by routine laboratory testing using a MicroScan WalkAway system (Siemens, https://www.siemens.com). Because quinolone-resistant H. influenzae had never been isolated from a pediatric patient, we performed a detailed susceptibility test for 2019-19 by the broth microdilution method. For controls in the biochemical test, we used H. influenzae GTC 14202T (DSM 4690T) and H. haemolyticus GTC 15009T (NCTC 10659T) type strains purchased from Gifu University (https://www.gifu-u.ac.jp). In addition, we used H. influenzae ATCC 49247 and Rd as quality control strains for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We cultured the isolates overnight on chocolate agar at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere and stored them in 10% skim milk at −80°C until use. This study was approved by the research ethics committees at the Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences (case no. 16-12).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of ESBL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phenotypic confirmation of ESBL production was carried out by combination disk test using both cefotaxime and ceftazidime disks, alone and in combination with clavulanic acid (Condalab). Minimum inhibitory concentrations were obtained with the MicroScan WalkAway system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., West Sacramento, CA, USA) using the NEG-MIC Type 44 panel. PCR detection of blaTEM, blaSHV, and blaCTX-M genes was done using the primers and conditions described by Monstein et al. [20 (link)]. Subtyping of CTX-M group was carried out by sequencing and comparison with AMRFinderPlus tool available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) server [21 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Blood Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients provided 20-mL blood specimens that were divided into 10-mL aliquots in Bactec-plus aerobic/F and anaerobic/F bottles (BD Diagnostic Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and immediately subjected to microbiological testing. The specimens were incubated in a Bactec Fx instrument (BD Diagnostic Systems) and bacterial organisms isolated from positive blood cultures were examined using conventional overnight identification/sensitivity panels with a MicroScan WalkAway system (Siemens, West Sacramento, CA, USA). Tested antibiotic classes included ampicillin/sulbactam, aztreonam, cephalosporins (three third-generation and one fourth-generation), aminoglycosides (gentamicin and tobramycin), quinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin), carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem), tetracycline, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Isolates were considered carbapenem-resistant if they were resistant to imipenem or meropenem.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Amniotic Fluid Microbial Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amniotic fluid samples were analyzed according to standard methods used by the Clinical Laboratory Center (certified ISO15189) at Toyama University Hospital. First, 1 mL amniotic fluid sample was centrifuged at 1,880×g for 15 min to spin down the microorganisms, and 800 μL of the supernatant fraction was carefully removed in order to not lose the pellet, leaving the pellet with 200 μL of supernatant. One drop of the resulting pellet with 200 μL of supernatant was placed on the appropriate agar media (PPLO agar for Mycoplasma, Brucella HK agar for anaerobic bacteria, blood agar, BTB agar and chocolate agar, respectively) and incubated aerobically or anaerobically until sufficient growth was present to proceed with testing (PPLO agar was incubated anaerobically at 35°C with 10% CO2 for up to 7 days, Brucella HK agar was incubated anaerobically at 35°C with 10% CO2 for up to 72 hours, blood agar and BTB agar was incubated aerobically at 35°C for up to 72 hours, and chocolate agar was incubated aerobically at 35°C with 5% CO2 for up to 72 hours). For all samples, the specific identification methods differed according to the organism, although they included the MicroScan WalkAway system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, IL, USA), RapID ANA II (Thermo Fisher SCIENTICIC, UK) and various latex agglutination and biochemical spot tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!