The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

31 protocols using triple quadrupole mass spectrometer

1

Quantitative Analysis of Plant Hormones and Phenolics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the hormonal analysis, fresh material was frozen in liquid N, ground, and freeze-dried. Fresh tissue (0.5 g) was immediately homogenized in 2.5 mL of ultrapure water, and 100 ng mL−1 of a mixture of internal standards ((2H6-ABA (to quantify ABA), 2H4-SA (to quantify SA and propylparaben (to quantify phenolic compounds like ferulic acid (FA) and chlorogenic acid (CGA)), (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)) were added prior to extraction. The samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 45 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was partitioned against diethylether, dried in a speed vacuum and resuspended in 90:10 H2O:MeOH. [78 (link)]. After extraction, a 20 µL aliquot was injected directly into an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system with an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm 2.1 × 50 mm) (Waters, Mildford, MA, USA), which was interfaced with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (TQD, Waters, Manchester, United Kingdom). Version 4.1 of the MASSLYNX NT software (Micromass) was used to process the quantitative data from the calibration standards and plant samples. The concentrations of hormones and phenolic compounds were determined in each sample by normalizing the chromatographic area for each compound with the fresh weight of the corresponding sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UPLC-ESI-MS/MS Quantification of Harmaline and Harmine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Harmaline and harmine concentrations were simultaneous quantitative determined on a Waters-ACQUITY™ UPLC system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) using an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm particle size). Mass spectrometric detection was performed using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) equipped with electrospray ionization in positive ionization mode, and all other instrumental parameters were set according to our previous study (Li et al., 2016 (link)). The UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method was well-validated (data not shown) and the analytical method was successfully applied to determine the concentration of harmine and harmaline in the HBSS buffers. Figure S2 presents the representative of typical MRM chromatograms of blank HBSS, blank HBSS spiked with harmine, harmaline and IS, and IS-spiked HBSS sample collected at 30 min after administration of harmine and harmaline.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Short/Medium-Chain Fatty Acids and Polyphenol Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of SCFA/MCFA, a liquid–liquid extraction procedure was used [25 (link)]. For quantification a Trace GC Ultra gas chromatograph (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) was used, equipped with an autosampler PAL combi-xt autosampler (CTC Diagnostics AG, Zwingen, Switzerland) coupled to a TSQ Quantum XLS tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). The GC–MS data processing was performed using a qualitative and quantitative software package, XCALIBUR™ 2.2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA).
For analysis of polyphenol metabolites, the extraction procedure was as described previously [26 (link)]. The MS system used was a Waters Xevo TQ (Milford, MA, USA) triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, coupled with an electrospray interface and polarity switching option during acquisition. The LC-MS data processing was performed using qualitative and quantitative packages in Waters MassLynx 4.1 and TargetLynx software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Metabolites by UPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The glucose, creatine, and creatinine contents were determined by the Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC®) Technology system equipped with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA). The specific instrument parameters are described in Nan et al. [53 ]. Then, 5 g of the sample were added to 40 mL ultrapure water for the ultrasonic extraction of the supernatant for 30 min and then centrifuged. Next, 0.6 mL of the supernatant were mixed with 1.4 mL absolute ethanol and centrifuged. The supernatant was placed in a liquid vial for testing. The parent ion, daughter ion, cone voltage, collision voltage, and residence time of creatine, creatinine and glucose in multireaction monitoring (MRM) mode are shown in Table S1, Supplementary Materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Targeted Quantitative Analysis by UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Waters triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Prague, Czech Republic)with an electrospray ionization source in negative mode (ESI-) was used. The mass spectrometer was operated with the following parameters: capillary voltage 3 kV, source temperature 150 °C, desolvation temperature 350 °C, cone gas 50 L/h, and desolvation gas 800 L/h. The source cone voltages and collision energies were manually optimized for each SRM transition. The chromatographic apparatus consisted of a Waters ACQUITY UPLC system with a binary gradient pump, autosampler and column thermostat (Waters, Prague, Czech Republic). Chromatographic separation was performed on an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 μm particle size) column. The column temperature was maintained at 30 °C. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water. Mobile phase B consisted of 100% acetonitrile. The elution started at 20% B (0–0.5 min), increasing to 90% B (0.5–2 min) to 90% B (2–3 min), returning to 20% B and re-equilibrating at 3–4 min. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min, and the injection volume was 5 μL. MassLynx software version 4.1 (Waters Corporation, Prague, Czech Republic) was used for instrument control and data acquisition and analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Targeted Metabolomic Analysis of Serum Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Targeted metabolomic analysis of serum samples was performed using the Biocrates Absolute-IDQ P180 kit (Life Science AG, Innsbruck, Austria). The serum samples were processed as per the manufacturer instructions and analyzed on a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, CT, USA). As part of the quality control, three concentrations of quality controls were included in the kit. Targeted metabolic data were analyzed by TargetLynx (Waters, Milford, CT, USA), and MetIDQ software (Biocrates, Innsbruck, Austria) was applied to integrate the metabolites by automated calculation of metabolite concentrations. Metabolites with the concentration below the limit of detection were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Proteomic Sample Preparation Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TCEP (tris-(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine) was purchased from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA). LysC and trypsin proteases were purchased from Promega (Fitchburg, WI). C18 Cartridges for sample preparation and chromatography columns for bRPLC and online HPLC of Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer were purchased from Waters (Milford, MA). Acetonitrile was purchased from JT Baker, and formic acid was obtained from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA). MyProt-Buffer 1, MyProt-Buffer 2, and MyProt-Buffer 3 were utilized by MyOmicsDx, Inc (Towson, MD, USA). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise indicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Metabolomics Analysis of Blood Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolated blood plasma samples were used to measure 101 targeted metabolites by a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer coupled to ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) in the metabolomics core facility at the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM) [45 (link)]. Quantified data were further processed by online tool, MetaboAnalyst 3.0 (McGill University, QC, Canada, http://www.metaboanalyst.ca). Data were auto scaled (mean-centered and divided by the standard deviation of each variable) to perform correlation and enrichment analysis. Unsupervised PCA was used to identify variation in data set. Dendogram was plotted based on Ward and each cell represents concentration values. Bar-graphs were plotted for selected individual metabolites with mean and standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Aortic Tissue Analysis of ONE-Lysyl and IsoLG-lysyl

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aortic tissues were isolated, homogenized and then the ONE-Lysyl and IsoLG-lysyl adducts were measured by LC/MS/MS using a Waters Xevo-TQ-Smicro triple quadrupole mass spectrometer as previously described [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

UPLC-MS/MS Bioanalytical Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed by a UPLC-MS/MS system equipped with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, United States) and Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm) at 40°C. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile (A) and 0.1% formic acid (B) with a linear gradient elution at 0.4 ml/min for 3 min. The elution procedure was as follows: 0.0–0.6 min (rapidly rising from 10 to 50% A), 0.6–1 min (increasing from 50 to 80% A), 1–2 min (increasing from 80 to 95% A), 2–2.5 min (maintained at 95% A), and 2.5–2.6 min (reduced to 10% A).
Mass spectrometer contained a triple quadrupole and an ESI source. The optimized parameters of multiple reaction monitoring detection included a source temperature of 150°C and desolvation temperature of 500°C. The MS conditions, chemical structure, and chromatograms for the probe drugs and IS are presented in Table 1 and in Supplementary Figures S1, S2 (Wang et al., 2020 (link)). All sample data were acquired with MassLynx 4.1 software (Waters Corp.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!