The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lambda 1050 spectrophotometer

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States

The Lambda 1050 spectrophotometer is a high-performance UV-Vis-NIR instrument designed for a wide range of analytical applications. It features a dual-beam optical design and can measure transmittance, reflectance, and absorbance across the ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared wavelength ranges.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using lambda 1050 spectrophotometer

1

Spectroscopic Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV-vis-NIR absorption spectroscopy was conducted on a PerkinElmer Lambda 1050 spectrophotometer at various temperatures for both solution and solid states. Steady-state photoluminescence spectra were recorded though an Edinburgh Instruments FLSP920 double-monochromator luminescence spectrometer equipped with a nitrogen-cooled near-IR sensitive photomultiplier (Hamamatsu).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of beta-Gold Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structure, morphology and size of the synthesized b-AuNPs were characterized using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD; Scintag XDS-2000), transmission electronic microscope (TEM; FEI Tecnai Spirit G2) operating at 120 kV. The absorption spectra of the samples were recorded on a Lambda 1050 spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer, USA). The hydrodynamic size, size-distribution and zetapotential of the samples were investigated with dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Zetasizer Nano-S (Malvern, Germany) equipped with a 4 mW HeNe laser.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Spectroscopic Analysis of Cable Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Native cable bacterium filaments and fiber skeletons were prepared as for Raman microscopy and were either analyzed in dried or wet state. To this end, multiple filaments were deposited together in large, dense clumps on fused quartz microscopy slides (Micro-Tec GE124 fused quartz) and air-dried. Samples were wetted by adding a thin layer of mQ on the microscopy slide after filament deposition, covering the sample with a fused quartz coverslip, and sealing the edges with nail polish. The thin water layer on the microscopy slide reduced the reflectance of the fused quartz substrate.
Absorption spectra were measured with a Lambda 1050 spectrophotometer® (Perkin-Elmer) equipped with a Cassegrain-type microscope (Chassé et al., 2015 (link)). Light was focused to a focal spot of 150 μm onto dense spots with either cable bacteria or fiber skeletons, and spots without material for background correction. Transmitted light was collected and quantified with an array of three detectors: a CCD, an InGaAs photodiode, and a polycrystalline lead sulfide (PbS) detector. These detectors covered a spectral range from 210 to 2,500 nm. Spectrum processing was limited to background subtraction and averaging of spectra recorded under identical conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Structural and Optical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV–vis absorption
measurements were conducted using a PerkinElmer Lambda 1050 spectrophotometer.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried out using a Rigaku
Ultima IV diffractometer for structural analysis at a scan speed of
8°/min and step size of 0.02° using Cu Kα target.
Photoluminescence was measured using an Agilent Cary Eclipse fluorescence
spectrophotometer to examine the photoactivity of the samples. Surface
morphology was observed using a scanning electron microscope (Zeiss
EVO 50 & EVO 18 Special) operating at 20 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ferroelectric hysteresis loops were obtained using the Radiant Technologies Precision LC II Ferroelectric Tester. The 2D ferroelectric domain phase mapping characterizations were aquired through Piezoelectric Force Microscopy (PFM) using a Bruker Dimension Icon with SCM-PIT probes. The magnetic hysteresis loops were measured by the Quantum Design MPMS-3 SQUID magnetometer in vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) mode. The ellipsometry measurements were performed using the J.A. Woollam RC2 spectroscopic ellipsometer. Various oscillators models were constructed to fit this data with the Mean Square Error (MSE) always below 5. Optical transmittance characterization was completed using the PerkinElmer LAMBDA 1050 spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Metal-Organic Frameworks for VOC Adsorption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemicals are analytical-grade reagents and were used without further purification. A Bruker D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer was used to collect the X-ray diffraction patterns of all samples using Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 40 mA, λ = 1.5418 Å). Nitrogen adsorption−desorption was determined with a MicrotracBEL BELSORP-mini X at −196 °C. The samples were activated at 150 °C for 24 h under a vacuum before adsorption experiments. After sensing measurement, MOF pellets were ground into a fine powder with a mortar for FTIR and UV–Vis characterization. UV–Vis absorption spectra were collected on a PerkinElmer Lambda 1050 spectrophotometer. FTIR spectra were measured by a PerkinElmer frontier FT-IR in attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode with a KBr window. High-resolution mass spectra of adsorbed VOCs were measured on Bruker Compact (APCI Q-TOF mode) and Bruker Autoflex speed (MALDI-TOF mode). The adsorbed VOCs were extracted from the MOFs by using dichloromethane. The impedance measurements were performed using an Autolab PGSTAT302 N equipped with FRA32 M module (Metrohm) over the frequency range of 1 Hz to 1 MHz with an input voltage amplitude of 300 mV and the current range of 1 mA. Impedance values were measured from Nyquist plots of MIL-100(Al, Fe) before and after VOC adsorption of preparation. Impedance data analysis was performed on NOVA software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Optical Characterization of Perovskite Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Absorption spectra were recorded with a PerkinElmer LAMBDA 1050 spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere to account for reflected and transmitted light. PDS measurements were acquired on a custom-built setup by monitoring the deflection of a fixed wavelength (670 nm) laser probe beam following absorption of each monochromatic pump wavelength by a thin film immersed in an inert liquid FC-72 Fluorinert (3M Company). PL quantum yield measurements were taken by mounting perovskite films or encapsulated device stacks in an integrating sphere and photoexciting with a 532-nm continuous-wave laser. The laser and the emission signals were measured and quantified using a calibrated Andor iDus DU490A InGaAs detector for the determination of PLQE.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Panavir Concentration using Spectrophotometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The absorption spectrum of Panavir has a characteristic peak in the region of 190 nm (Fig. 2), which allows calorimetric measuring of concentration. The Panavir extinction coefficient was determined for Panavir solutions in Tris/EDTA buffer (20 mM/1.5 mM, pH 8.2) using a Lambda 1050 spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, USA) in the concentration range of 100–1200 ng/ml. For the extinction coefficient we have obtained the value of (3.28 ± 0.09) ⋅ 103 ml/(ng⋅cm). To determine the Panavir concentration, we have compared the optical densities of the high molecular weight (HMW) and nuclease/protease-resistant fraction of the cells' cytoplasm obtained from cultures treated and not treated with Panavir. The difference in optical densities at 190 nm was fully attributed to Panavir particles consumed by the cells.

Area-normalized absorption spectra of an aqueous solution of Panavir (green), cytosolic fraction of HL-60 cells (blue) and HMW fractions of cytosol of HNEpC cells treated with Panavir (red). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Stability and Optical Properties of ZnO-MoS2 Nanocomposite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The stability of E-MoS2, ZnO and the hybrid ZnO-MoS2 nanocomposite was compared by measuring its zeta potential using a zetasizer nano ZS (Malvern Panalytical Ltd.,Worcestershire, UK). ZnO and the as-prepared dried samples of the hybrid ZnO-MoS2 were prepared using deionised water (pH 7.6) at a concentration of 3 mg/mL, and the dispersion of E-MoS2 was centrifuged and later re-dispersed in deionised water at a similar concentration. All measurements were performed in triplicates to determine the average zeta potential. Raman spectra of E-MoS2 and the hybrid ZnO-MoS2 photocatalyst were collected by means of a non-resonant 532 nm cw laser. The full-spectrum was recorded while placing the samples on a standard XY motorised stage and a coupled microscope objective (20× with 3 μm laser spot size) helped in scanning and collecting the back-scattered light using a grating spectrometer. Optical analysis was performed using UV–vis spectroscopy (Perkin-Elmer lambda 1050 spectrophotometer, Waltham, MA, USA) to measure the band gap energy of the prepared photocatalyst by means of the well-known Tauc relation, Equation (1).

where h refers to the Plank constant, ν is the incident of light frequency, A is the absorbance, Eg is the bandgap and n equals to ½, which refers to the direct band gap energy of the E-MoS2 dispersion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Raman and SERS Analysis of Ag Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman and SERS spectrum were obtained using a confocal Raman spectrometer (LabRam ARAMIS, Yvon/HORIBA) with a 633 nm excitation from a HeNe laser. The laser beam with a power of 1.0 mW on the sample was used ona microscope with a magnification of 50× objective lens. The silicon wafer (band at 520.7 cm−1) was used to calibrate the spectrometer, and the measurement range was from 400 to 1800 cm−1. The Raman spectrum was acquired from pure solid powder on a glass slide. The SERS spectrum was acquired using Ag nanoparticles (Ag NPs) described above. UV − Vis spectroscopy extinction spectra were measured with a Lambda1050+ spectrophotometer (Perkinelmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!