The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using thermo k alpha

1

Electrolytic Synthesis of CD Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The electrolysis for CDs preparation was conducted using a bespoke apparatus (Kaishin Co., Ltd, Taiwan). Fluorescence measurements were performed by using a Shimadzu RF-6000 spectrofluorophotometer. The ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectra were obtained by a Hitachi U-2900 UV–vis spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan). The transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were taken on a PHILIPS CM-200 TWIN TEM (Amsterdam, Netherlands). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was measured by a Thermo K-Alpha (Thermo Fisher, USA.). Zeta potential measurements were performed on a Zetasizer Nano-ZS90 (Malvern, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Carbon Quantum Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The shape, particle size, and surface morphology of the CQDs with or without the effects of HAs were determined using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) which was equipped with JEM-2100 transmission (JEM-2100, Jeol, Akishima, Japan) and operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV [9 (link)]. The chemical bonds on the CQDs were characterized using a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) (IRTracer-100, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), with the recorded spectrum in the range of 600 cm−1 and 4000 cm−1. The oxidation state and functional groups of the CQDs were determined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Thermo Kalpha, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and peaked using XPS Peak v.4.1 [9 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Magnetite Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological structures and size dimensions of magnetites were explored using SEM (Sigma 500, Carl Zeiss Co., Germany), and the particle size was measured using Nano Measurer software (version 1.2, Fudan University, China). The surface element compositions of the magnetites were explored using XPS (Thermo K-Alpha, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., US), and the energy spectrum analysis of C1s and O1s was conducted using CasaXPS software (Version 2.3.0, Casa software Ltd., UK). Specific surface areas of the magnetites were obtained from the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms using a physical adsorption instrument (ASAP 2020, Micrometrics Co., US) using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method, and the pore properties including the pore volume and size of the magnetite were calculated from the desorption isotherms using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) and Horvath–Kawazoe (HK) model, respectively. The point of zero charge values (pHPZC) of the magnetites were determined using the method reported by Kocharova et al.25 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of PMS/Mn3O4 Catalytic Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase of the sample was analyzed by X-ray diffractometer (XRD, X’Pert PRO MPD, Nalytical company Netherlands) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) in the range of 10~90 degrees. The morphology and microstructure of the samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi Regulus8100, HITACHI Japan) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Tecnai F20, FEI company American). By analyzing the scanned images, the microscopic morphology, pore size and aggregation degree of the sample materials can be determined. In order to determine the chemical state of elements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Kalpha, Thermo Fisher Scientific, American) was used. The degree of mineralization in PMS/Mn3O4 systems was evaluated by TOC analyzer (TOC-L). In order to determine the molecular structure of catalytic materials, a Raman spectrometer (Thermo DXR, Thermo Fisher Scientific, American, excitation wavelength = 633 nm) was used to test and analyze.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Surface Chemical Composition Analysis by XPS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical composition of the surface was evaluated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Thermo K-Alpha, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). A given XPS analysis was conducted in an area of 400 μm2 (20 μm × 20 μm), with 3 such XPS analyses conducted for each of 3 samples exposed to the same MWHT treatment (for a total of 9 analyses, n = 9) over a combined area of 3600 μm2. For each sample, two analyses were conducted at locations near the sample center, and one analysis was conducted near the sample edge. An XR5 gun was used at 15 kV. Survey spectra were averaged over 3 scans using a pass energy of 150 eV, a 1 eV energy step size, and a 20 ms dwell time. High resolution spectra of titanium (Ti2p), oxygen (O1s), and carbon (C1s), the most dominant elements on the surface, were obtained by averaging over 15 scans at 20 eV, with a 0.1 eV energy step size and a 50 ms dwell time. Analyses were conducted using Thermo Avantage software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Reference peaks were obtained from the LaSurface online database and the XPS Handbook of the Elements and Native Oxides (XPS International, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterizing Magnetic Nanoparticles using Advanced Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrodynamic size distribution of MNPs was analyzed using dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements (ZetaSizer NanoZS 90, Malvern, UK). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the morphology of MNP, unmodified QTF, MNP modified QTFs, and anti-IgG doped MNP modified QTF. Samples were fixed onto aluminum stub surfaces using double-sided carbon tape and coated with a gold-palladium (Au-Pd; 60-40%) mixture via sputter-coating. The specimens were then observed under SEM operating at 7.5 kV, and 30 kV, with an original magnification of 20,000× and 65,000× (Apreo S model-FEG, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Utilizing ImageJ ® software version 1.54d (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), the average diameter of the MNPs was determined from SEM images captured at various locations. The results are presented as the mean value ± standard deviation.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to characterize the chemical composition of MNP modified QTF, anti-IgG loaded MNP modified QTF, and after IgG detection with anti-IgG loaded MNP modified QTF. A Thermo K-Alpha (Thermo Fisher Sci., Waltham, MA, USA) instrument and a Thermo K-Alpha monochromatic high-performance XPS spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Sci., Waltham, MA, USA) at a pressure of 1 × 10 -9 torr were used for XPS characterization. A 400 µm spot size was used per sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Structural and Magnetic Properties of FeND

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Evaluation of FeND structural properties was conducted with Raman spectroscopy using a Renishaw 1000B (Renishaw, UK) Raman spectrometer equipped with a 532 nm wavelength CW laser (DPGL-2100F: Photop Suwtech, China). After dispersion in double-distilled (DD) water, the sample was drop-casted onto silicon wafers, dried, and measured under ambient conditions. Further, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were conducted to observe the elemental composition of the various admixtures present in FeND. The analysis was performed using Thermo K Alpha (Thermo Fisher Scientific, US) fitted with the X-ray source K ALPHA and a multichannel detector. The recorded data was charge shift calibrated using C 1s binding energy and analysed using XPSPEAK41 software.
A superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID, Quantum Design, MPMS-SQUID-VSM, USA) was used to determine the magnetism exhibited by FeND. Specimens were packaged in plastic bags and measured at ambient temperature with a maximum applied magnetic field of 2 T.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of CoP@ZIF-8/pNF Electrocatalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD, Cu Kα radiation, λ = 0.15406 nm) ranging from 5° to 80° (2θ) was used to examine the crystallization and compounding of the CoP@ZIF-8/pNF electrocatalyst. Additionally, it was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Hitachi S4800, Tokyo, Japan) and a field emission transmission electron microscope (FETEM, JEOL JEM-F200, Tokyo, Japan). X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS) measurements of the electrocatalyst were taken on Thermo K-Alpha+ (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to identify the composition of the electrocatalyst.
Additionally, CoP@ZIF-8 was scraped off the pNF by continuous ultrasound in an anhydrous ethanol solution. The powder was then collected by centrifugation before being washed and dried. The resulting sample was used for XRD, TEM and XPS characterization. To measure the interior, the powder sample was etched by Ar plasma using a precision ion polishing system (Gatan 695, Pleasanton, CA, USA) for XPS testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Electrochemical and XPS Analysis of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All electrochemical measurements were performed using an Ivium Compactstat 104 Model B08084 (Ivium Technologies NL). A step potential of 1 mV was used in cyclic voltammetry experiments. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed at open circuit potential (OCP = 0.19 V vs. SCE) in a 5 mM Fe(CN)6 3-and 5 mM Fe(CN)6 4-containing 0.1 M KNO3 solution with an amplitude of 10 mV. The frequency was varied from 10 kHz to 0.01 Hz. Equivalent circuit data fitting was carried out using ZView software.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) experiments were performed using a Thermo K Alpha (Thermo Scientific) spectrometer (operating at ≈ 10 -8 -10 -9 Torr), a 180° double focusing hemispherical analyzer running in constant analyzer energy (CAE) mode with a 128-channel detector. A mono-chromated Al Kα radiation source (1486.7 eV) was used. Peak fitting was performed with XPS Peak Fit (v. 4.1) software using Shirley background subtraction. Peaks were referenced to the adventitious carbon C1s peak (284.6 eV) and peak areas were normalized to the photoelectron cross-section of the F1s photoelectron signal using atomic sensitivity factors. 21
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Structural Characterization of Glass Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Si MAS NMR data were collected at 4.7 T (39.69 MHz resonance frequency) using a 5 mm MAS NMR probe. Powdered samples were packed into 5 mm zirconia rotors and all measurements were conducted using 5 kHz sample spinning. Measurements were made with signal averaging of 320 to 2200 acquisitions, using /6 pulse widths of 1.4 s and recycle delays of 90 s. 29 Si spectra were processed without additional line broadening and referenced to tetramethylsilane at 0.0 ppm.
X-ray photoelectron (XPS; Thermo K-alpha; Thermo Fisher Scientific) spectroscopy was used to study the structural coordination of molybdenum (Mo 3d) and neodymium (Nd 3d and Nd 4d) in glasses. The glasses were fractured prior their analysis by XPS. All the spectra were deconvoluted in CASA XPS software using Gaussian-Lorentzian peak fitting after Shirley background subtraction. 30 The deconvolutions were carried out subject to the constraint of a constant full width half maxima (FWHM) for the same element. All photoelectron binding energies were referenced to adventitious C 1s contamination peaks at a binding energy of 285.0 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!