The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using live dead cell dye

1

Polyfunctional T-cell Profiling by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ICS flow cytometry was done as previously described85 . In brief, 106 PBMCs were pulsed with autologous peptide at 10 μM in the presence of co-stimulatory antibodies (anti-CD28 and anti-CD49D), anti-CD107a-FITC, monensin, and brefeldin A (all from BD Biosciences) for 6 hrs. The cells were then surface stained with LIVE/DEAD cell dye (Invitrogen), anti-CD3-Alexa 780 (eBioscience), and anti-CD8-PE (BD Biosciences). The cells were permeabilized and labeled with anti-IFN-γ-Alexa 700, anti-IL-2-APC, anti-TNFα-PECy7, and anti-Granzyme B-V450 (all from BD Biosciences). CD3 events greater than 100,000 were acquired on an LSR II (BD Immunocytometry Systems), and data were analyzed using FlowJo (version 9.6.4; TreeStar). Polyfunctionality analysis was performed using Boolean gating and SPICE & PESTLE (version 5.1; NIAID)86 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polyfunctional T-cell Immune Response Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry based ICS assay was done as previously described [35 ,49 (link),50 (link)]. In brief, 106 PBMCs were pulsed with peptide at 10uM in the presence of co-stimulatory antibodies (anti-CD28 and anti-CD49D) and anti-CD107a-FITC (all from BD Biosciences) for 2 hrs at 37°C. Monensin and brefeldin A (both from BD Biosciences) were then added and the cultures incubated for an additional 12 hrs. Next day, the cells were labeled with LIVE/DEAD cell dye (Invitrogen) and surface stained with anti-CD3-Pac Blue, anti-CD8-V500, and anti-CD4-Alexa 780 (both from BD Biosciences). The cells were permeabilized and labeled with anti-IFN-γ-Alexa 700, anti-IL-2-APC, anti-TNFα-PECy7, and anti-Granzyme A-PE (all from BD Biosciences). CD3 events greater than 100,000 were acquired on an LSR II (BD Immunocytometry Systems), and data were analyzed using FlowJo (version 9.6.4; TreeStar). Polyfunctionality analysis was performed using Boolean gating and SPICE and Pestle software (version 5.1; NIAID).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparametric NK cell profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh PBMC or decidual cells were washed and resuspended in 100 ml FACS buffer (PBS, 1% FCS) and incubated with 5 mg human γ-globulins (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min to block nonspecific binding. Staining with directly conjugated Abs to surface markers was performed for 25 min at 4°C. Abs were CD56 (clone HCD56, BV421, BioLegend), CD3 (UCHT1, allophycocyanin-Cy7, BioLegend) and CD9-PerCP-Cy5.5 (M-L13, PerCP, BD Pharmingen), KIR2DL1 (143211, FITC, R&D Systems), NKG2A (Z199, allophycocyanin, Beckman Coulter), KIR2DL3/L2/S2 (GL183, PE-Cy7, Beckman Coulter), CD122 (Tu27, APC, BD Biosciences), and LILRB1 (HP-F1, PE, Beckman Coulter). For some donors KIR2DL3 alone was stained using clone 180701 (R&D Systems). KIR3DL1 was stained with DX9 conjugated to biotin (BioLegend). Cells were washed with FACS buffer twice followed by staining the near-IR fixable Live/Dead cell dye (Invitrogen) and biotinylated Ab was detected with streptavidin Qdot-605. After washing in FACS buffer, cells were and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde. For intracellular Ags, cells were treated with FIX & PERM (Life Technologies) and stained for Ki67 (B56, PerCP-cy5.5, BD Biosciences) or c-Myc (9E10, Alexa647, AbD Serotec). Samples were run on an LSRFortessa FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Activation of IL-17 in Mouse Lymphoma EL4 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 65

Determination of the Activation Rate on Mouse Lymphoma EL4

Mouse lymphoma EL4 cells transfected with RORγt plasmid were cultured at 37° C. under an atmosphere with 5% CO2, with a test compound added simultaneously. After 24 hours, the generation efficiency of IL-17A was analyzed. Before collection of cells, PMA at 50 ng/mL and ionomycin at 500 ng/mL were added for stimulation for 4 hours. The proportion of IL-17 was detected by intracellular staining and flow cytometry. Meanwhile, Live/Dead Cell Dye (Invitrogen) staining was used to analyze the cell survival rate and to judge whether the drug had toxicity to cells. The activation rate of IL-17 generated by EL4 cells for the compound was measured at a concentration of 2 μM. The results showed that the compounds of the present invention had good abilities to increase IL-17 generation (see Table 2).

TABLE 2
Determination of the activation of IL-17 generated by EL4 cells
Example No.+act %
 2**
 5*
 6**
 9A*
11*
13*
16***
17***
19**
20***
21**
24*
26*
32**
33**
34***
35***
36***
37**
40***
41***
47*
49*
53**
55**
58**
60**
62**
*** means +act %@ 2 μM > 50%;
** means +act %@ 2 μM between 20%-50%;
* means +act %@ 2 μM < 20%.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Th17 Cell Differentiation Potency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 66

Determination of the Half-Maximal Effect Concentration of Mouse Th17 Cell Differentiation

Experimental methods: Mouse spleen CD4+T cells were separated and differentiated into Th17 cells. CD4+T cells were cultured in the environment containing anti-CD3 (0.25 μg/mL), anti-CD28 (1 μg/mL), anti-IL4 (2 μg/mL), anti-IFN-γ (2 μg/mL), TGF-β (5 ng/mL), and IL6 (20 ng/mL), with a test compound added at the same time. After 96 hours, the differentiation efficiency of Th17 was analyzed. Before collection of cells, PMA at 50 ng/mL and ionomycin at 500 ng/mL were added for stimulation for 4 hours, and the proportion of IL-17 was detected by intracellular staining and flow cytometry. Meanwhile, we used Live/Dead Cell Dye (Invitrogen) staining method to analyze the cell survival rate and to judge whether the drug had toxicity to cells, and determined the half-maximal effect concentration EC50 of the compounds. The results showed that the compounds of the present invention had good abilities to induce Th17 differentiation and increase IL-17 production (see Table 3).

TABLE 3
EC50 results of mouse Th17 cell differentiation experiments
Example
No.EC50
16***
17***
19**
20*
21***
32***
36*
41*
43**
*** means EC50 value < 50 nM;
** means EC50 value between 50 nM to 150 nM;
* means EC50 value > 150 nM.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Polyfunctional T-cell Profiling by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ICS flow cytometry was done as previously described85 . In brief, 106 PBMCs were pulsed with autologous peptide at 10 μM in the presence of co-stimulatory antibodies (anti-CD28 and anti-CD49D), anti-CD107a-FITC, monensin, and brefeldin A (all from BD Biosciences) for 6 hrs. The cells were then surface stained with LIVE/DEAD cell dye (Invitrogen), anti-CD3-Alexa 780 (eBioscience), and anti-CD8-PE (BD Biosciences). The cells were permeabilized and labeled with anti-IFN-γ-Alexa 700, anti-IL-2-APC, anti-TNFα-PECy7, and anti-Granzyme B-V450 (all from BD Biosciences). CD3 events greater than 100,000 were acquired on an LSR II (BD Immunocytometry Systems), and data were analyzed using FlowJo (version 9.6.4; TreeStar). Polyfunctionality analysis was performed using Boolean gating and SPICE & PESTLE (version 5.1; NIAID)86 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Treg Suppression of CD4+ T Cell Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10-week old female BALB/c, NZM, and iNZM mice were treated with/without UVB for 5 consecutive days. The dLNs were processed into a single cell suspension, as described in flow cytometry. CD4+CD25+ TReg cells and CD4+ T cells were isolated via CD4+ CD25+ Regulatory T Cell Isolation Kit and CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit, respectively (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergish Gladbach, Germany). TReg cells were labeled with CFSE (ThermoFisher, Eugene, Oregon) and CD4+ cells were labeled with cell proliferation dye 670 (ThermoFisher). Following labeling, the cells were co-incubated at a ratio of 0:1,1:1,1:2,1:4 (TReg: TEffector) with/without anti-CD3/CD28 beads (ThermoFisher) for 72 hrs in a 96-well plate. Cells were then stained, as described in the flow cytometry section, for CD3 clone: 17A2 (BioLegend) for 45 minutes, followed by staining with live/dead cell dye (ThermoFisher) for 30 minutes. After staining, cells were resuspended in PBS and data collected on a BD LSR II flow cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo. For analysis, samples were gated on CFSE negative cells to exclude TRegs, followed by live cell gating, then CD3+ cells and lastly proliferation dye 670 to examine percent proliferation of CD4+ T cells (Supplementary figure 1). Percentage proliferation was calculated using the formula: (100 × 1:1,1:2, or 1:4, samples) /0:1 sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Live/Dead Cell Staining Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All cell culture steps refer to Materials and methods 2.18, and only the seeding density was modified to 1 × 105 cells/well. Briefly, the cell culture plate obtained above were washed with PBS three times, and then the live/dead cell dye (R37601, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) was added to the culture plate and incubated in a 37 °C humidified environment with 5% CO2 for 30 min. After staining, the cell culture plates were washed with PBS three times, and then the stained cells were observed by a fluorescence microscope, where the living cells showed green while the dead cells showed red. The statistical analysis was performed through ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!