The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Quantiva

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Quantiva is a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) system designed for quantitative analysis of small molecules. It provides reliable and sensitive detection and quantitation of a wide range of analytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using quantiva

1

Chlorophyll a Spectroscopic and Mass Spectrometric Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Equal aliquots of chlorophyll a were added to each aqueous medium, and absorption spectra were measured using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All absorption spectra of chlorophyll a in each medium with continuous illumination treatment were scanned in a range of 250 to 800 nm.
Mass spectrometry experiments were performed on the chlorophyll extracts using the full mass scan mode of a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Quantiva, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in positive-ion mode. An amount of chlorophyll a extracts (100 µL) in three different media, i.e., EtOH, DW, and C-PC medium, was further diluted using 900 µL methanol solvent with 1% formic acid, and then the mixtures were subjected to ionization by direct-infusion atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI). The following mass spectrometric parameters were used in the experiments: Flow rate 20 μL/min; sheath gas (N2) pressure 25 psi; auxiliary gas (N2) pressure 5 psi; ion-transfer tube temperature 150 °C; vaporizer temperature 450 °C; and positive ion discharge current 4 μA. XcaliburTM v.4.1 software was used for data acquisition and processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ATP and AMP Metabolism Profiling by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ability of different populations of cells to metabolize ATP to ADP, AMP and adenosine (and from AMP to adenosine) was measured using an ATP and AMP hydrolysis Mass Spectrometry protocol69 (link). Briefly, cells of interest were isolated by either MACS or flow sorting and then separately cultured at 2 × 104 cells/well in triplicate in 96-well plates at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 1 h, in the presence or absence of 50 μM ATP or AMP. Cells were pelleted and supernatants flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Wells containing no cells and wells containing cells with no added ATP/AMP were used as controls. Supernatants were thawed and metabolites extracted using 2:1 methanol/chloroform followed by 1:1 water and chloroform. Nucleotides were measured by Liquid Chromatography tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using a Thermo Quantiva interfaced with a Ultra High performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) Vanquish system (Thermo Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK). For chromatography on the UHPLC system, the strong mobile phase (A) was 100 mM ammonium acetate, the weak mobile phase was acetonitrile (B) and the LC column used was the ZIC-HILIC column from Sequant (100 × 2.1 mm, 5 µm). Relative abundance of each metabolite was measured as area under the curve at relevant masses and normalized to stable isotope labelled standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Paclitaxel in Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PTX in samples were detected and quantified on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Quantiva, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) coupled to a binary pump HPLC (UltiMate 3000, Thermo Scientific). MS parameters were optimized for PTX under direct infusion at 5 μL min-1 to identify the SRM transitions (precursor/product fragment ion pair) with the highest intensity as 876.3–308.04 m/z for the sodium adduct of PTX and 830.3–549.2 m/z for the internal standard, Docetaxel. Samples were maintained at 4 °C on an autosampler before injection. The injection volume was 10 μL. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Hypersil Gold 5 μm 50 × 3 mm column (Thermo Scientific) maintained at 30 °C using a solvent gradient method. Solvent A was water (0.1% formic acid). Solvent B was acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid). The gradient method used was 0–1.6 min (20% B to 80% B), 1.6–4 min (80% B), 4–5 min (80% B to 20% B), 5–6 min (20% B). The flow rate was 0.5 mL min-1. Sample acquisition and analysis was performed with TraceFinder 3.3 (Thermo Scientific). Data is calculated using standard curves generated for PTX.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Uric Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UA from plasma samples were quantified on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Quantiva, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) coupled to a binary pump HPLC (UltiMate 3000, Thermo Scientific). MS parameters were optimized for the target compound under direct infusion at 5μL min-1 to identify the selected reaction monitoring (SRM) transitions (precursor/product fragment ion pair) with the highest intensity in negative mode as 227.1–198 m/z for UA and 240.2–148.18 m/z for the internal standard, Salbutamol. Samples were maintained at 4 °C on an autosampler before injection. The injection volume was 10μL. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Hypersil Gold 5 μm 50 × 3 mm column (Thermo Scientific) maintained at 30 °C using a solvent gradient method. Solvent A was water (with 0.1% formic acid). Solvent B was acetonitrile (with 0.1% formic acid). The gradient method used was 0–4 min (20% B to 80% B), 4–4.1 min (80% B to 20% B) and 4.1–6 min (20% B). The flow rate was 0.5mL min-1. Sample acquisition and analysis was performed with TraceFinder 3.3 (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Metabolite Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples (tissue or cell pellets) were lysed by sonication in 5%
perchloric acid (10 mg of tissue per 100 μl). Immediately after
sonication, an equal volume of 0.3 M sodium bicarbonate was added. After
centrifugation at 15,000 × g, the supernatant was desalted employing a
Bond-Elut column (50 mg C-18 silica, Agilent Technologies). Salts were removed
by washing with 25 mM sodium bicarbonate. The analyte fraction was eluted with
25 mM sodium bicarbonate/30% acetonitrile. The eluate (150 μl) was
concentrated in vacuo using a Speed-Vac Concentrator to 75
μl. Ten microliters were injected onto a Vydac C-18 reversed phase HPLC
Column and eluted with a gradient from 0 to 30 % acetonitrile in 15 mM ammonium
formate. The eluant was electrosprayed into a triple quadrupole mass
spectrometer (Thermo Quantiva) and analyzed by multiple-reaction monitoring.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Serum THC Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood was collected ≈20 minutes by cardiac puncture after the end of exposure while rats were still anesthetized from the terminal FMD measurement procedure, and serum was isolated by standard methods. Samples were sent to the University of California, San Francisco Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital for analysis of THC. Free THC was determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (Thermo Quantiva with heated electro spray ion source in positive ion mode) on a pentane extract of serum. Briefly, following the addition of d3‐THC internal standard, 0.4 mL of serum was deproteinized by the addition 1 mL of acetonitrile. The supernatant was diluted with 1 mL of H2O and extracted with 5 mL of pentane. The pentane was nitrogen evaporated and reconstituted in 200 μL of methanol. A Waters 3×100 1.6‐μm ultra‐performance liquid chromatography column and a methanol formic acid gradient were used for the chromatographic separation of the THC. Calibration was done using air‐exposed rat serum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Arsenic Speciation Analysis in Seaweed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Identification of DMA, MMA, and As(V) peaks was carried out by spiking with the respective standards (Fig. 1) and retention time comparison to CRM 7405-b (hijiki) which has a characteristically high As(V) concentration (24.4 mg kg−1). Identification of AsSugars was carried out by retention time comparison of an in-house reference material: a sample of A. nodosum that had previously undergone LC-MS/MS analysis (Quantiva, Thermo) (Electronic Supplementary Material Fig. S2). Column recoveries were acceptable for all chromatographic runs and calculated to be between 82 and 107%, suggesting all extracted species were sufficiently eluted from the column. Certified reference materials were analysed alongside each batch of samples.

A sample of spiked F. vesiculosus extracted using 1% (v/v) HNO3 and 3% H2O2 and analysed with HPLC-ICP-MS. The sample was spiked with 0.5 µg L−1 DMA, MMA, and As(V)

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Glucagon Infusion and Amino Acid Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants completed one experimental day after an overnight fast, including liquids, tobacco, and medication. Any metformin treatment was paused 7 days before the experimental day. Blood samples were frequently drawn before, during, and after a 1-h intravenous infusion of glucagon (4 ng/kg/min, GlucaGen, Novo Nordisk A/S). Amino acid levels were measured in plasma from blood drawn into chilled tubes containing EDTA, aprotinin, and valine pyrrolidine. Liver fat content was evaluated by measuring the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) using transient elastography (FibroScan Touch 502, Echosens SA, France) (16 (link)). Amino acids were quantified by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS Quantiva, Thermo Scientific) (17 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of NOTA and Sodium Saccharin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used a Tandem mass spectrometer system (Quantiva, Thermo Scientific, USA) for identification of the conjugated substance. We applied an electrospray ionization (ESI) mode and analyzed the NOTA and SAC in negative mode. The mass range was basically set to 100 to 1700 m/z in order to confirm the ratio of the combination of NOTA and sodium saccharin. Also, for detailed identification, the mass range was subdivided (100‐400, 400‐800, 800‐1,200, and 1,200‐1700 m/z) and confirmed. Capillary voltage was set to 3,500 V, sheath gas was set to 35 Arb, and aux gas was set to 2 Arb. First, we used multiple reaction mode (MRM) analysis to identify fragment ions of individual substances of NOTA and SAC. The standard stock solution of each substance was diluted with ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm) to confirm the Q1 value, and then applied the CE value to identify the fragment ions (Q3). The prepared sample was also diluted 10 times with ultrapure water, and then analyzed. We prepared ultrapure water for tandem mass spectrometry analysis by using an aquaMAX™ Ultra 370 series (YL Instruments, Korea) water purification system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!