The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using rpn202

1

BrdU Labeling of Cycling Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We gave a single injection of 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine (BrdU, GE Healthcare) at 0.6 mg/animal to label cycling cells. BrdU staining followed the abovementioned immunofluorescent staining protocol, excluding methanol blocking. We used anti-BrdU antibody in 1:400 (GE Healthcare, RPN202).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

BrdU Labeling in Mouse Lung

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were given intraperitoneal injections of 10 μl BrdU (GE Healthcare; RPN201) per gram body weight 4 hours before sacrifice. Lungs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated, and paraffin embedded. Sections were treated with monoclonal mouse anti-BrdU (clone BU-1; RPN202; GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. FITC-labeled anti-mouse secondary antibodies were used (Jackson Immunoresearch). All slides were mounted using Vectashield with DAPI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ascidian Gonad Proliferation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ascidian gonads and the COS cells were incubated overnight at 18°C (Gonads) or at 37°C (COS cells) in their respective medium containing 50 μM bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) (sigma B5002, St Louis, MO, USA) and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C. After 1h DNase treatment at 37°C, Gonads and COS cells were incubated with monoclonal anti-BrdU (GE Healthcare RPN 202) for 2h at 37°C. Appropriate secondary antibody was FITC-conjugated donkey-anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Laboratories). The Click-IT EdU imaging kit from Invitrogen was used as an alternative to BrdU labeling. EdU (5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine) is a nucleoside analog of thymidine and is incorporated into DNA during active DNA synthesis [17 (link)]. Detection is based on a click copper-catalyzed covalent reaction between an azide and an alkyne. After dissection, gonads were opened and incubated overnight at 18°C with 50 μM EdU followed by paraformaldehyde fixation, permeabilization and DAPI staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Cell Proliferation via BrdU Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the level of proliferation, we evaluated BrdU incorporation during the regenerative process. For this, following electroporation, explants were placed in wells containing bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU; 50 μM) and incubated at RT in an incubator chamber for 2 days. Explants were then fixed and sectioned as explained above. Cryosections were washed with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 15 min, washed twice with 0.1 M PBS for 15 min and treated with 0.05 M HCl for 1 hr. After another wash with 0.1 M PBS (15 min), sections were blocked with goat serum for 1 hr. Slides were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-BrdU (1:5, GE Healthcare RPN202) in a humid chamber overnight. The following day, slides were washed with 0.1 M PBS for 15 min three times and incubated with the secondary antibody Cy3 goat anti-mouse antibody (1:1000, Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories) for 1 h in a humid chamber. Following the three 0.1 M PBS washes, slides were mounted in buffered glycerol containing DAPI (1 μg/mL, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histological analysis and immunohistochemical staining were performed as described previously 15 (link), 16 (link). Briefly, after deparaffinization, rehydration and antigen retrieval, tissue slides (4μm thick) were blocked with 3% H2O2 for 10 min and incubated with primary antibodies, including rabbit anti-MST4 (Abcam; ab52491) and mouse anti-BrdU(GE Healthcare; RPN202), at 4°C overnight. The slides were then stained with a corresponding secondary antibody at 37°C for 20 min. Finally, the sections were stained with diaminobenzidine (DAB) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry analysis were performed independently by two pathologists without knowledge of the backgrounds of the patients. Staining intensity and percentage of staining-positive cells were evaluated for the IHC scores. Staining intensity was classified as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate) and 3 (strong). Percentage of stained cells were classified as 0 (<5 %), 1 (≥5%, <25 %), 2 (≥25, <75%) and 3 (≥75%). The final IHC score is the score of intensity multiplied by the score of percentage. The scores 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 were defined as low, and the scores 6 and 9 were defined as high. Slides with conflicting evaluations were reassessed, and a consensus was reached.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Detection of DNA Damage and Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin, paraffin-embedded and cut in 3-μm sections, which were mounted in superfrostplus microscope slides (Thermo Scientific, Cat. 165061) and dried. The immunohistochemistry was performed using an automated immunostaining platform (Ventana discovery XT, Bond Max II, Leica). Antigen retrieval was performed with low pH buffer (CC1m) for p-H2AX and high pH buffer (ER2) for BrdU. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked (peroxide hydrogen at 3%), and slides were then incubated with anti-BrdU (BU-1, GE Healthcare, RPN202, Lot. 341585, 1:100) and phospho-histone H2AX (Ser139) (γH2AX, JBW301, Millipore, 05-636, Lot. DAM1493341, 1:4000). After the primary antibody, slides were incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies when needed (rabbit anti-mouse Abcam) and visualization systems (Omni Map anti-Rabbit, Ventana, Roche; Bond Polymer Refine Detection, Bond, Leica) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. Immunohistochemical reaction was developed using 3,30- diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) (ChromoMap DAB, Ventana, Roche; Bond Polymer Refine Detection, Bond, Leica), and nuclei were counterstained with Carazzi’s hematoxylin. Finally, the slides were dehydrated, cleared, and mounted with a permanent mounting medium for microscopic evaluation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

BrdU Labeling of Glioma Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glioma cells were labeled with BrdU (GE Healthcare; RPN202) were performed as previously described44 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell death was examined by TUNEL staining on slides using the ApopTag Peroxidase kit (Millipore). Mitotic cells were identified by antibody staining for phospho-histone H3 (PHH3, Cell Signaling) using a standard citrate buffer antigen retrieval and detection with a peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody. To track DNA synthesis, 10 mg/kg bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdU) was administered to pregnant dams by intraperitoneal injection two hours prior to harvesting. Briefly, sections were pre-treated with proteinase K, exonuclease III and DPN1, and BrdU was detected with the anti-BrdU antibody (RPN202; GE Healthcare) [35 (link)]. In each case, at least 1 section from 2 animals was counted per genotype. We counted the positive cells in each frontal bone primordia, and because it consists of ordinal data, it cannot be averaged. We found that the data fell naturally into two categories. With the PHH3 data, there were 8 sections that were below 6 positive cells, while the remaining sections were greater than 6 cells. For the TUNEL data, no wildtype section had greater than 3 apoptotic cells, therefore we analyzed the data using these categories.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!