The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using hotplate

1

Modulating Transparency of Polymer Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The transparency of immobilized and free-standing films was modulated post spin-coating. Transparent films were produced by annealing the water-saturated film at 120 °C on a hot plate (Fisher Scientific) for 1 min. Opaque films were obtained by either allowing the films to dry at 23 °C or by freezing the water-saturated film at −80 °C overnight, followed by lyophilization (FreeZone, Labconco) (Figures 1 and S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Photochromic and Thermochromic Surface Coloring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Color morphing of photochromic surfaces was performed by irradiating with a 365 nm UV torch (Tattu), as well as 265 nm and 385 nm UV lights (UVP). Color morphing of thermochromic surfaces was performed by heating to 60 °C using a hot plate (Fisher) and cooling back to ambient temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Synthesized NiOx Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and crystal structure of the synthesized NiOx NPs were measured using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM-2100F, Tokyo, Japan). The surface morphology was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) was conducted to investigate the elemental chemical compositions. The electrical resistance was measured using a Digital Source Meter (Keithley 2450, Cleveland, OH, USA), and the operating temperature was established using a hot plate (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA). The temperature of the hot plate was precisely controlled using a commercial thermocouple (type K, EA11A, Extech Instruments, Nashua, NH, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were conducted using an FC-XP10 (Nexsa, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The thicknesses of the thin films were characterized using atomic force microscopy (AFM, Park System XE100, Suwon, Korea).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Time-Lapse Imaging of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The films were cut 1 cm by 1 cm, each piece was placed in a separate well of a six-well plate, and the well was filled with 5 ml of PBS (Gibco, pH 7.4) or DMEM (Gibco). The six-well plates were placed on a hot plate (Fisherbrand) at 37°C and imaged every 10 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of NiOx Nanoparticle Sensors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sizes of NiOx NPs were estimated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM-2100F, Tokyo, Japan) images. The surface morphology of the sensor electrodes was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) and atomic force microscopy (AFM, Park System XE100, Suwon, Korea). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) analysis was conducted to investigate the elemental composition of the electrode. X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 Advance, Billerica, MA, USA) patterns were recorded for phase identification. The resistance was measured using a multimeter (Agilent U1251B, Santa Clara, CA, USA) while the temperature was precisely controlled by a hot plate (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA). The temperature of the hot plate also was monitored by a commercial thermocouple (Type K, EA11A). The resistivity (ρ) of the electrode was calculated using the equation: ρ = R·(A/l), where R, A, and l are the resistance, cross-sectional area, and length of the electrode, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Determination of Sr-90 and Sr-88 in Environmental Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For our analysis, we used Sr resin cartridges (2 mL) acquired over several years (see Table 2) and a vacuum box that can accommodate 24 samples (Eichrom Technologies). Three Quantulus1220 ultra-low-level liquid scintillation counters (PerkinElmer) were used for LSC Sr-90 analysis in alpha/beta mode and a NexION® 300 inductively coupled plasma dynamic reaction cell mass spectrometer (ICP-DRC-MS) (PerkinElmer) was used for Sr-88 ICP-MS analysis as a recovery method. We also used a high-precision analytical balance accurate to 0.0001 g (Mettler Toledo) and a hot plate (Fisher Scientific) for drying eluted samples after purification for gravimetric recovery. Additional supplies included 20 mL LSC plastic vials (PerkinElmer, Inc.); 15 mL and 50 mL conical polypropylene tubes (Beckton Dickinson Labware) for solution preparation, a bottle top dispenser with capacity from 5 mL to 25 mL (Brinkman Instruments) for LSC cocktail dispensing, and a set of four pipettes with total volume range from 5 μL to 5 mL (Eppendorf).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Digestion Procedure for Elemental Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A sample (0.01–0.08 g for solid sample or 0.1–0.3 g for liquid sample) was accurately weighed in a glass test tube with a screw cap (15 mL capacity), and it was then mixed with a catalyst of 0.125 g of copper(ii) sulphate and 1.0 g of sodium sulphate and 3 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid. The tube was placed on a homemade 37 hole digestion block (Fig. S1a) made of iron functioning as a digestion plate (3.6 cm × 17.8 cm i.d.). The dimension of each hole was 1.8 cm diameter and 2.8 cm depth. The block was put on the top of a hotplate (Fisher Scientific, USA) to heat and digest the sample for 90 min (Fig. S1b). During the digestion process, it was placed in a fume hood. After 90 min of digestion, the digestion tube was cooled to room temperature. The digested solution was filtered through filter paper into a 25 mL volumetric flask and the volume was adjusted to the mark with water. Blanks were also treated in the same manner but without samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of CNT-based Sensors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wires soldered to an IDEA chip were connected to the function generator (Stanford Research Systems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) to apply a constant 5V peak-to-peak (Vpp) voltage at various frequencies (see Figure 1). A polymer cage cut out of double-sided stick tape (3M, St. Paul, MN, USA) was used to contain the suspension of CNTs atop of the IDEAs. The CNT suspension was deposited in a series of 10 μL drops. A microscope glass slide (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Fisherbrand, Waltham, MA, USA) was placed atop of the IDEA chip/polymer cage assembly to decrease the evaporation rate of the solution. The resistance between the fingers was measured with a 3320 Innova multimeter (Innova, Irvine, CA, USA). In order to facilitate solvent evaporation after deposition, the IDEA chips were placed on a hot plate (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA) at 200 °C for 20 min. The resistance of the CNT bridges was measured again after the heat treatment. This was done to understand the extent to which the evaporation of the residual solution induces closer contact between the nanotubes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis of Silver-Doped Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was based on our previously published methods [10 (link),21 (link)]. In brief, calcium hydroxide (Sigma Aldrich, Dorset, UK) (50 mmol) was suspended in 500 mL deionized water (dH2O) into which 0, 1, 2.5, or 5 mmol silver nitrate (Sigma Aldrich, UK) (corresponding to 0, 2, 5, or 10 mol%, respectively) was added and stirred at 400 rpm for 1 h on a hotplate (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) at 90 °C. Phosphoric acid (Sigma Aldrich, UK) (30 mmol) was dissolved in 250 mL dH2O, poured into the calcium and silver preparation, and stirred for a further hour. The suspension was left to settle overnight, after which the supernatant was poured off and the silver-doped nHA suspension was washed with dH2O (3 × 500 mL). The silver-doped nHA suspensions were dried at 60 °C and ground in an agate mortar and pestle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microfluidic Mould Fabrication Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microfluidic moulds were fabricated using Ordyl® SY 300 dry film negative photoresist (55 μm thickness, ElgaEurope s.r.l., Milan, Italy) on 75 mm × 50 mm borosilicate glass slides (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA). After cleaning with acetone and isopropanol and dehydration of the glass slide on a hotplate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, US) for 5 min at 150 °C, two sheets of photoresist were laminated onto the slide using a thermal laminator (325R6, FalconK, France) at 120 °C and roller speed 4. Using an exposure masking UV LED lamp (UV-KUB 2, Kloé, Montpellier, France) the photoresist was then exposed to UV light (365 nm, 23.3 mW/cm2), for 7 s with a film photomask (Selba S.A., Versoix, Switzerland) and subsequently developed with a solvent blend (Ordyl® SY Developer, ElgaEurope s.r.l., Milan, Italy) for approximately 10 min to remove unexposed sections of the photoresist. The mould fabrication process was finished with a hard bake of 30 min at 120 °C on a hotplate. This mould can be used for both sTPE hot embossing as well as PDMS soft lithography. Moulds with thicker features can be achieved by laminating successive layers of the photoresist before the exposure masking step.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!