The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using cd166 pe

1

Immunophenotyping of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immune phenotyping of hADSCs was undertaken using antibodies to: CD90 (FITC) (#555595, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), CD29 (APC) (#303008, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD166 (PE) (#343904, BioLegend), CD44 (PE) (#103024, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD73 (APC) (#344006, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and a negative control (PE) (BD StemflowTM Human MSC Analysis Kit, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) including antibodies to CD34, CD11b, CD19, CD45, and HLA-DR. Native hADSCs, hADSCs-BFP and hADSCs-IL2 were trypsinized and washed (2× PBS). Cell aliquots (1 × 105 cells/mL) were incubated with appropriate antibodies for 30 min protected from light at room temperature. Cells were washed once with PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry using FACS Aria III (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and data analyzed using BD FACSDiva™ software version 7.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Cell Surface Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were detached with Accutase (Sigma-Aldrich; 5 min at 37 °C) and then incubated with the following mouse anti-human mAbs for 30 min on ice: CD73-Pacific Blue™, CD90-FITC, CD105-FITC, CD166-PE, CD34-APC, CD45-PerCP, CD117-PE (all from BioLegend) and CD133-APC (Miltenyi Biotec). After two washing steps (PBS with 2 % FBS), the sample tubes were acquired on a BD FACSAria III (BD Biosciences) and at least 10.000 events were recorded. Data were analyzed with BD FACSDiva and FlowJo V10 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of hADSCs and CIMVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the expression of cluster of differentiation (CD) markers typical for MSCs on the surface of hADSCs and isolate from them CIMVs, the following antibodies were used: CD90 (FITC) (#555595, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), CD29 (APC) (#303008, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD166 (PE) (#343904, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD44 (PE) (#103024, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD73 (APC) (#344006, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and a negative control (PE) (BD Stemflow™ Human MSC Analysis Kit, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) including antibodies to CD34, CD11b, CD19, CD45, and HLA-DR. Briefly, 1 × 105 native hADSCs, hADSCs-BFP and hADSCs-IL2 were trypsinized and washed two times with PBS, and stained with the antibodies for 30 min in the dark at room temperature. Cells were washed once with PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry using FACSAria III (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), and data were analyzed using BD FACSDiva™ software version 7.0.
CIMVs were isolated from 2 × 105 native hADSCs, hADSCs-BFP and hADSCs-IL2, washed once with PBS and stained with the listed above antibodies for 30 min in the dark at room temperature. Then, CIMVs were washed once with PBS and analyzed using the FACSAria III flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Data were analyzed using BD FACSDiva™ software version 7.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cancer Stem Cell Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor cells were trypsinized and washed in 1 × PBS. The cells were then stained with the antibodies of choice: CD166-PE (Biolegend, 343904) or CD133–647 (Biolegend, 141216) or CD44 (Biolegend, 103047); in 1% BSA(Bovine Serum Albumin)-PBS. Cell cycle of monolayers or spheres of the cells were analyzed by fixing the cells in cold 75% ethanol. The analysis was carried out by the core facility of LCCC at Georgetown University. The annexin V (Biolegend, 640912) and propidium iodide (Biolegend, 421301) experiments were carried out following instruction from the manufacturer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunophenotyping of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digested cells were suspended in HBSS at a density of 1–5 × 107 cells/mL and stained for 30 minutes on ice with THY-1-APC (BD Pharmingen) and LNGFR-PE (Miltenyi Biotec) antibodies for sorting. Cultured cells (at three and five passages) were harvested using cell-dissociation buffer (Gibco). Cells (1.0 × 105) were suspended in ice-cold HBSS and stained for 30 minutes on ice with the monoclonal antibodies CD45-PE-Cy7 (Tonbo Biosciences), CD29-PE, CD31-PE-Cy7, CD44-PE, CD105-PE and CD166-PE (BioLegend) for cell surface analysis. Flow cytometric analysis and cell sorting were performed on a triple-laser Moflo system (Beckman Coulter) and data were analyzed using Flowjo software (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Human Olfactory Mesenchymal Stem Cells by FACS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated hO-MSCs were characterized using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). At least 100,000 isolated hO-MSCs were used for the analysis of each cell surface marker. Briefly, hO-MSCs were harvested and stained with the cell surface marker antibodies described below for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark and analyzed using a flow cytometer (FACS Canto II, Becton Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at the Soonchunhyang Biomedical Research Core Facility of the Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI). Antibodies were diluted 1:20 with FACS buffer containing 1% BSA in PBS and fluorescence-labeled cells were kept on ice during FACS analysis. MSC-positive markers CD29-PE (cat# 303,004, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD44-FITC (cat# 103,022, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD73-FITC (cat# 344,016, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD105-PE (cat# 12–1057-42, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), and CD166-PE (cat# 343,904, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA); and MSC-negative markers CD45-FITC (cat# 368,508, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD34-FITC (cat# 343,517, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and CD31-PE (cat# 303,106, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) were used for flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenotypic Characterization of MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 105 MSCs were incubated with 10 μl monoclonal antibody conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or phycoerythrin (PE): CD105-FITC (Biolegend, ImTec, Antwerpen, Belgium), CD90-PE (Biolegend), CD73-PE (Biolegend) and CD166-PE (Biolegend). Unbound antibody was washed after 15 min with 3 ml PBS (Gibco). The cell pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml PBS (Gibco). Samples were analyzed with the flow cytometer Macs Quant (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) with 10,000 events recorded for each condition. The morphology of cultured cells was evaluated using light microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunophenotyping of Dental Pulp Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DPSCs were treated with 0.25% trypsin/0.02% EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich) and centrifuged to generate a cell pellet. Cells were labelled with 10 μL FcR blocking solution (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and various antibodies (see below, 10 μL per 1 × 106 cells unless stated) in a total volume of 100 μL labelling buffer (PBS, 2 mM EDTA (Alfa Aesar, Heysham, UK) and 0.5% (w/v) BSA (Sigma-Aldrich)) for 20 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Following labelling, 900 μL labelling buffer was added to each sample before centrifugation and resuspension in 500 μL labelling buffer. Samples were then analysed using an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) running FACSDiva 8.0 software (BD Biosciences), subsequent data analysis was performed using Kaluza 1.3 (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, FL). Antibodies used were: CD29-Alexa Fluor 488 (5 μL per 1 × 106 cells), CD34-FITC (5 μL per 1 × 106 cells), CD44-FITC, CD73-PE (2 μL per 1 × 106 cells), CD90-APC and CD166-PE (all Biolegend, San Diego, CA). All threshold values were obtained by analysing autofluorescence of non-labelled hDPSCs and reactivity of isotype matched controls. Events were gated based on forward and side scatter and colour compensation was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples from four women were used in this step. The cells were evaluated according to the criteria for characterization of MSCs33 (link). Regarding adhesion to polystyrene and formation of fibroblast-like forming colonies, immunophenotypic15 characterization was done by flow cytometry by labeling the cells with the following antibodies: CD73-PECy7, CD90-FITC, CD105- FITC, CD19-PE Cy7, CD34-APC Cy7, CD45-APC, HLA-DR-PERCP Cy5.5, CD44-PERCP Cy5.5, CD49c-PE, CD151-APC, CD166-PE, CD117–APC, SSEA4-FITC, Oct4-PE (Biolegend, San Diego, CA), and NANOG-PERCP Cy5.5 (BD Pharmingen). The analysis was done in BD FACSCanto or BD FACSVerse and the results were analyzed using BD FACSDiva.
Analysis of differentiation into the three main mesenchymal lines was performed using adipogenesis, chondrogenesis, and osteogenesis StemPro differentiation kits (Gibco), according to the manufacturer's protocol. 0.5% oil Red O (Sigma-Aldrich), Alcian blue (Sigma-Aldrich), and Alizarin red (Sigma-Aldrich) were used respectively to observe adipogenesis, chondrogenesis, and osteogenesis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pre-conjugated antibodies CD49c-APC and CD166-PE were purchased from BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA. SSEA4-PE, CD29-APC, CD54-PE, CD90-FITC, CD105-APC, CD106-APC were purchased from Miltenyi Biotec Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. Isotype IgG control antibodies were also purchased from Miltenyi Biotec Inc. Cells to be stained were washed 2 times with 5.0 mL of sterile HBSS and detached using 2.0 mL of TrypLE Express (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). Cells were washed with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and spun down using a centrifuge set for 300xg. Cells were washed once again with 5.0 mL sterile 1x PBS and spun down at 300xg. Viable cell number was quantified using a hemacytometer and 0.4% Trypan blue solution (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). For each sample to be stained, 1.0 × 106 viable cells were resuspended in 100 µL of Flow buffer (1x PBS, pH 7.2, 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 2 mM EDTA). Pre-conjugated antibody (10 µL) was added to the resuspension, mixed and incubated for 10 min in the dark at 4 °C. Cells were washed 3 times with 1.0 mL of 1x PBS and resuspended in 500 mL of Flow buffer before single channel FACS analysis using an Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Control experiments for non-specific staining using mouse IgG were performed alongside all experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!