The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using anti p atr

1

Jinfukang Oral Liquid Freeze-Dried Powder Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Jinfukang oral liquid freeze-dried powder was prepared and detected the fingerprint (Additional file 2: Table S2) by Professor Yu Jin of East China University of Science and Technology (Shanghai, China). A cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) was obtained from Dojindo. The Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit and propidium iodide (PI) were purchased from BD Pharmingen. 2,7-Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) and the antioxidant NAC were purchased from Sigma. A caspase-3 detection kit was purchased from Biovision. The anti-γ-H2AX, anti-p-ATM, anti-p-ATR, anti-PARP1, goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP and donkey anti-rabbit IgG-HRP antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. The anti-p53, anti-p21, anti-CDK4, anti-Cyclin D, anti-Cyclin E, anti-Fas, anti-Survivin, and anti-β-actin antibodies were purchased from Proteintech.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Response Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies from this study were as follows: anti-keratin-10, anti-loricrin, anti-TopBP1, and anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA); anti-E2F1, anti-p63, anti-ATR, anti-p-ATR, anti-CHK1, anti-p-CHK1, anti-CHK2, anti-p-CHK2, anti-RAD51, anti-Mre11, anti-NBS1, anti-BRCA1, and anti-BRCA2 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); anti-p73 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA); anti-p53 (Millipore, Burlington, MA); anti-p-TopBP1 (Abgent, San Diego, CA). AKT inhibitors MK2206 (2μM) and LY294002 (25μM) were purchased from SelleckChem (Houston, TX). Cell lysates were processed and assayed by western blot analysis as previously described 60 (link). Briefly, J2 feeders were firstly removed by Versene (PBS containing 0.5 mM EDTA) treatment and keratinocytes were collected and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer on ice for 30 minutes. The samples were then electrophoresed on SDS-page gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. At last the membranes were developed using ECL prime or ECL reagents (Amersham, Pittsburgh, PA) and chemiluminescence signals were detected using Eastman Kodak x-ray films.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblotting of DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell lysates were prepared in RIPA lysis buffer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, TX, USA). Protein extracts were resolved by SDS-PAGE using Mini-Protean TGX stain-free precast gels and then electron-transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad Trans-blot turbo transfer pack). The following antibodies were used: anti-ATM (#2873), anti-pATM (Ser1981, #13050), anti-ATR (#2790), anti-pATR (Thr1989, #30632), anti-Chk1 (#2345), anti-pChk1 (Ser317, #2344), anti-Chk2 (#2662), anti-pChk2 (Thr68, #2197), anti-Cdc2 (#9112), anti-pCdc2 (Tyr15, #4539), and anti-CCNB1 (#4138), all from Cell Signaling Technology (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) and anti-β-actin (ID, Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit (NA934) IgG (GE Healthcare) was used as secondary antibody. The enhanced chemiluminescence kit SuperSignal™ West Femto (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used for signal detection at ChemiDoc-It (UVP). Data were analyzed by ImageJ 1.52v software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Cell Signaling Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blots were performed as previously described [42 (link)]. Briefly, Hey1, COV504, or PEO1 cells were cultured with various concentrations of Ribociclib (clinical grade provided by Novartis) and cisplatin (clinical grade purchased from the University of Michigan Pharmacy) for 3 days, lysed in RIPA buffer (Pierce) with complete protease inhibitor (Roche), and quantified by Bradford assay (Pierce) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, 100 ug of protein were loaded onto a 4–12% NuPAGE SDS gel (Thermo Fisher) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Thermo Fisher). Membranes were incubated overnight with 1:1000 anti-RB, 1:1000 anti-pRB-S807/811, 1:1000 anti-pCHK1, or 1:1000 anti-pATR (all from Cell Signaling) at room temperature and then washed and incubated for 1h with 1:10,000 anti-mouse HRP or anti-rabbit HRP (Cell Signaling). Visualization was performed with ECL Plus Western Blotting Substrate (Pierce). Densitometry and quantification were subsequently performed with ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoblotting of Keratinocyte Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The inhibitors used in this study were as follows: 100 nM UCN01 and 5 µM VE822 (Selleckchem, Houston, TX); 10 µM pimozide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); and 5 µM CHK2i (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). The antibodies used in this study were as follows: antiinvolucrin, anti-TopBP1, and anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA) and anti-STAT-5, anti-CHK2, anti-ATM, anti-p-CHK2 (Thr68), anti-p-ATM (Ser1981), anti-CHK1, anti-ATR, anti-p-CHK1 (Ser296), anti-p-CHK1 (Ser345), and anti-p-ATR (Cell Signaling, Inc., Danvers, MA). For Western blot analysis, cell lysates were processed as previously described (36 (link)). Briefly, keratinocytes were first isolated from J2 feeders by treatment with Versene (phosphate-buffered saline [PBS] containing 0.5 mM EDTA) and lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer on ice for 30 min. The protein samples were separated on SDS-PAGE gels and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were finally developed using Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) Prime or ECL reagents (Amersham, Pittsburgh, PA). Chemiluminescence signals were detected using Eastman Kodak X-ray films.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Analysis of p-ATR and CHK1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HFKs as well as CIN612 HPV31-positive keratinocytes were differentiated in raft cultures as previously described (35 (link)). Sections from HFK raft cultures or CIN612 cell raft cultures were processed by the Pathology Core Facility of Northwestern University. Cross sections of rafts were stained using a 1:100 dilution of anti-p-ATR (Cell Signaling, Inc., Danvers, MA) and 1:100 of anti-CHK1 (Cell Signaling, Inc., Danvers, MA). For the secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse antibody and anti-rabbit antibody were used (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). The sections were then mounted with Gelvatol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Images were captured using a Nikon C2+ spectral confocal microscope at Center of Advanced Microscopy of Northwestern University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for western blotting were prepared using a Total Protein Extraction Kit (Signalingway Antibody, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein samples were mixed with 5 × SDS buffer (Beyotime, China), and then denatured prior to separation on 10% SDS-PAGE gels. After transferring to membranes and blocking, the following antibodies were used: anti-γ-H2AX (1:1,000), anti-p-ATR (1:1,000), anti-p-CHK1 (1:1,000) and anti-p53 (1:10,000), all obtained from Cell Signaling Technology, USA. Goat anti-Mouse/Rabbit IgG Secondary Antibodies HRP Conjugated (1:8,000, Signalingway Antibody, USA) were used to detect bound primary antibodies. α-tubulin (1:6,000, HuaAn Biotechnology, China) was used as an internal control. Image J software (version 1.8.0_172, USA) was used for image analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Response Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies from this study were as follows: anti-keratin-10, anti-loricrin, anti-TopBP1, and anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA); anti-E2F1, anti-p63, anti-ATR, anti-p-ATR, anti-CHK1, anti-p-CHK1, anti-CHK2, anti-p-CHK2, anti-RAD51, anti-Mre11, anti-NBS1, anti-BRCA1, and anti-BRCA2 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); anti-p73 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA); anti-p53 (Millipore, Burlington, MA); anti-p-TopBP1 (Abgent, San Diego, CA). AKT inhibitors MK2206 (2μM) and LY294002 (25μM) were purchased from SelleckChem (Houston, TX). Cell lysates were processed and assayed by western blot analysis as previously described 60 (link). Briefly, J2 feeders were firstly removed by Versene (PBS containing 0.5 mM EDTA) treatment and keratinocytes were collected and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer on ice for 30 minutes. The samples were then electrophoresed on SDS-page gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. At last the membranes were developed using ECL prime or ECL reagents (Amersham, Pittsburgh, PA) and chemiluminescence signals were detected using Eastman Kodak x-ray films.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Signaling Pathway Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell lysates were prepared in RIPA lysis buffer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology TX, USA). Protein extracts were resolved by SDS-PAGE using Mini-Protean TGX stain-free precast gels and then electron-transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad
Trans-blot turbo transfer pack). The following antibodies were used: anti-ATM (#2873), anti-pATM (Ser1981, #13050), anti-ATR (#2790), anti-pATR (Thr1989, #30632), anti-Chk1 (#2345), anti-pChk1 (Ser317, #2344), anti-Cdc2 (#9112), anti-pCdc2 (Tyr15, #4539) and anti-CCNB1 (#4138), all from Cell Signaling Technology (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), anti-β-actin (ID, Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Horseradish peroxidaseconjugated anti-rabbit (NA934) IgG (GE Healthcare) was used as secondary antibody.
The enhanced chemiluminescence kit SuperSignal™ West Femto (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used for signal detection at ChemiDoc-It (UVP). Data were analyzed by ImageJ 1.52v software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!