The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cpd 030 critical point dryer

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in Germany

The Leica CPD 030 Critical Point Dryer is a laboratory equipment designed to prepare samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. Its core function is to remove the liquid phase from a sample in a controlled manner, while preserving the sample's structure and morphology. The device utilizes the critical point drying technique to achieve this without causing structural damage.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using cpd 030 critical point dryer

1

Cell Morphology Analysis by SEM and IF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemicals
were bought from Sigma-Aldrich, unless differently specified. Samples
(n = 4) were rinsed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde
for 30 min at RT. After washing with PBS, samples (n = 2) were dehydrated with a sequential series of 70–80–90–100%
ethanol solutions, 30 min per step. After dehydration, samples were
dried with a critical point dry setup (CPD 030 Critical Point Dryer,
Leica) and then gold-sputtered at 40 mA and 100 mTorr for 30 s. Cell
morphology was investigated using a Philips XL30 ESEM-FEG SEM at 10
kV and a working distance of 10 mm.
For other polymeric discs
(n = 2), attached cells were permeabilized and blocked
with TBP buffer (0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5% bovine serum albumin in PBS)
overnight at 4 °C. Cells were stained with monoclonal antiactin,
α-smooth muscle (1:200) conjugated with goat antimouse Alexa
Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, 1:1000) as the secondary antibody, Phalloidin-Texas
red (Molecular Probes, 1:100), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI) (1:100) with three times washing steps in between. A Nanozoomer
slide scanner equipped with a 40× objective (Hammamatsu) was
used to acquire images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Sample Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, samples for SEM were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in cacodylate buffer, followed by rinsing in buffer and dehydration in a graded ethanol series. The samples were critical point dried in a Bal-tec CPD030 critical point dryer, mounted on aluminum stubs, gold coated in a Leica ACE200 sputter coater, and examined in an FEI XL30 SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Self-Rolling VO2 Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As the first step of self-rolling, a layer of photoresist (AZ-5214, Micro-chemicals GmbH, Germany) with about 1 μm thickness was spin-coated (4000 RPM, 30 s, KW-4A, SIYOUYEN, China) and etching windows were defined by photolithography (HEIDELBERG, UPG501). After development, the window was exposed and etched by reactive ion etching (RIE, Trion T2) for 60 s (30 sccm CF4 and 30 sccm Ar flow, 300 mTorr chamber pressure, and 100 W etching power). The photoresist layer was removed by ultrasonication in ethanol (99.7%) lasting for 30 s. For the rolling process, patterned VO2 NMs were released from the substrate by using 40% HF (hydrofluoric acid) solution at room temperature for 5 min. Due to the high selectivity, the property of the VO2 NMs can hardly be influenced by this etching process. Finally, critical point drying (Leica CPD030 Critical Point Dryer) was applied to dry the rolled-up structures, avoiding structural collapse.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell Morphology on Titanium Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded on Ti, TiO2-NTs and Si-TiO2-NTs (Ф, 5.8 mm), respectively, for observing cell morphology. After culturing cells for one, three, and five days, the samples were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 2.5 % glutaraldehyde (Sigma, USA) in PBS for one hour. After rinsing three times with PBS for 10 min, the samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%) for 30 min each. The samples were dried through a CPD030 Critical Point Dryer (Leica Microsystems, Germany) and sputter-coated with a gold layer using a Hitachi E-1010 Ion Sputter (Quorum Technologies, Laughton, East Sussex UK). Finally, the morphology of cells was observed by SEM (Quanta, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SEM Imaging of PA14 Bacterial Adhesion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PA14 cultures grown in GM9 or MM9 for 24 hpi were centrifuged and the cell pellets were washed with phosphate buffer three times. One ml of each culture was added to a slide pretreated overnight with poly-L-lysine and left for one h to achieve proper adhesion. Slides were fixed in primary fixative solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2.0% paraformaldehyde solution in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) for one h at 4°C. Then, slides were washed in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer three times for ten min each. Slides were placed in secondary fixative solution (1% osmium tetroxide in 0.5 M sodium cacodylate buffer) for 30 min, followed by washing in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer. Then, slides were dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol, and dried using a CPD 030 critical point dryer (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL). Slides were mounted on SEM stubs and gold-coated before viewing with a Hitachi S-4300 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi High-Technologies America, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA). This procedure was performed using the Texas Tech University College of Arts and Sciences Microscopy facilities.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Tongue Taste Buds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dorsal region of the tongue was collected and immersed in a fixative solution containing 4% glutaraldehyde. The samples were dehydrated in a graded acetone series: 30%, 50%, 70%, 95% and 100%. A CPD 030 Critical Point Dryer (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) was utilised to remove moisture from the samples and to reach the critical point.
The metallisation was performed with a gold/palladium alloy. The samples were covered with an approximately 15nm layer using a Metalizer Med 020 (Leica Microsystems). Images were captured with a Philips XL20 Scanning Electron Microscope at 40-800X magnification.
The taste buds were counted by pathologists who were blinded to the groups. The buds in each field were counted, and the mean was calculated for each sample. Image-Pro Plus (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA) was utilised to determine the diameter of the gustatory papillae and the taste buds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!