The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using chloramphenicol

1

Confirming Inability of Escaped Phages to Infect E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm the inability of escaped phages to infect E. coli, 10 μl of VHH-phage library was used to challenge 50 mL of E. coli XL-1 blue (OD600 0.45) for 30 min at 37°C. The challenged E. coli XL-1 blue were then plated on the LB (Sigma Aldrich) agar plate supplemented with Tetracycline: 50 μg/mL (Duchefa Biochemie BV), chloramphenicol: 50 μg/mL (Duchefa Biochemie BV) and Kanamycin: 50 μg/mL (Duchefa Biochemie BV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ethanol Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
50 mg dried stems of WT and gux1/2 plants were used for each fermentation reaction. Stems were ball milled in 7 mL LB medium for 4 periods of 5 min at 20 Hz, with 5-min intervals between each ball milling cycle. The material was removed from ball milling vessel. To fully recover the biomass, the vessel was washed with further 2.5 mL LB. The stem suspension was sterilised by heat treatment at 85 °C for 10 min followed by cooling on ice. Each fermentation reaction was amended with 250 µL 1:10 Cellic® CTec2 solution, prepared as described in saccharification section, and 250 µL of TOP10 E. coli inoculum bearing the BBa_K1122676 BioBrick (OD600 of the inoculum was within 0.55–0.6 range). BBa_K1122676 encodes a Pyruvate decarboxylase and Alcohol dehydrogenase from Zymonomas mobilis which allow ethanol production in E. coli [25 (link)]. Biomass only reactions were supplemented with 250 µL of AmAc buffer and the bacterial inoculum. The plasmid was maintained by provision of 25 µg/mL Chloramphenicol (Duchefa Biochemie). The simultaneous saccharification and fermentation reactions were carried out for 96 h. at 37 °C and 200 rpm. Fermentation vessel was kept air-tight throughout the experiment. Ethanol levels were analysed using a commercial kit (Megazyme, catalogue code: K-ETOH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescence-based Bacterial Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments were performed in LB media [5 g/L Bacto yeast extract (BD, 212750), 10 g/L Bacto tryptone (BD; 211705), 10 g/L NaCl (Bio-Lab; 190305), and 1 L DDW] with 30 μg/mL kanamycin (Caisson Labs; K003) and 34 μg/mL chloramphenicol (Duchefa Biochemie; C0113). Green or red fluorescence of each strain was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy (Nikon Eclipe Ti; SI Appendix, Fig. S1). LacI experiments: Experiments with lacI strains were performed in DM (Davis–Mingioli minimal broth) with 0.021% lactose (Fig. 6) or 0.2% glycerol (Fig. 7).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial susceptibility to various antibiotics was determined by using a modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test [45 (link)]. Ampicillin (AM), cefotaxime (CTX), chloramphenicol (C), streptomycin (STP), ticarcillin (TIC) (Duchefa Biochemie) and kanamycin (K) (Panpharma, La Selle-en-Luitré, France) were used. Bacteria were grown overnight in liquid LB medium. The next day the bacterial suspension was adjusted to approximately 1.5 × 108 cfu/mL. The suspension was cross-streaked on Mueller-Hinton agar (Condalab, Madrid, Spain) using sterile cotton swabs. Then sterile 0.5 mm paper disks were placed on top (6 disks per Ø9 cm plate, equally spaced). Filter sterilized antibiotic solutions were then pipetted onto the disks so that each disk contained a desired amount of antibiotics (10 µg of AM and STP, 30 µg of CTX, C, K and 75 µg of TIC per disk). The plates were incubated overnight in the dark. Inhibition zones were measured the next day and bacterial susceptibility was determined using antibiotic susceptibility charts [46 (link),47 (link),48 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bacterial Genetic Manipulation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Escherichia coli JM109(DE3) cells were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). Arabinose for inducing lambda red recombinase was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Chloramphenicol and kanamycin were purchased from Duchefa (Haarlem, The Netherlands). All restriction enzymes and ligases were purchased from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA) or Takara (Otsu, Shiga, Japan). The DNA was amplified using Phusion® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs). The Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System from Promega (Madison, WI, USA) were used to purify the PCR products. Oligonucleotides were purchased from Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using a broth dilution method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline (CLSI, 2020 ). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of colistin (Sigma), chloramphenicol (Duchefa), streptomycin (Sigma), gentamycin (Sigma), piperacillin (Duchefa), cefotaxime (Sigma), tetracycline (Sigma), ciprofloxacin (Sigma), doripenem (Sigma), imipenem (Sigma), meropenem (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) were determined using E. coli ATCC 25922 (American Type Culture Collection; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) as a quality control strain (CLSI, 2020 ). The antibiotic resistance level of chloramphenicol and streptomycin was determined based on previous studies (Wei and Yang, 2017 (link); Yang et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Chemical Inventory for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following chemicals were used in the study: amphotericin B from Bio Basic (Canada), Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 medium from Biowest (USA), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid from Calbiochem (Germany), chloramphenicol from Duchefa Biochemie (The Netherlands), foetal bovine serum, penicillin--streptomycin solution, trypan blue, and trypsin-EDTA solution from Gibco (USA), Mueller--Hinton agar and Mueller-Hinton broth from HiMedia (India), potato dextrose agar from Laboratorios Conda (Spain), ethyl acetate (AR grade), ferric(III) chloride hexahydrate, Sabouraud dextrose agar, Dragendorff's reagent, and sodium acetate from Merck (Germany), chloroquine diphosphate salt from MP Biomedicals (USA), 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine from Nacalai Tesque (Japan), Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline, fluorescein sodium salt, gelatine, neutral red solution, p-iodonitrotetrazolium chloride, sodium bicarbonate, and tetracycline hydrochloride from Sigma-Aldrich (USA), ferrous sulphate heptahydrate from Loba Chemie (India), hexane, 95 % ethanol, chloroform, methanol (all of AR grade), and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) from Thermo Fisher Scientific (USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Molecular Chaperone Immunoblotting Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies and antibiotic product codes used are as follows: anti-CLPB (Aviva, catalog# ARP53790_P050) 0.5 µg/mL, anti-DnaK (Aviva, catalog# OAED00201) 1 µg/mL, anti-TF (Clontech, catalog# M201) 2 µg/mL, anti-groEL (Abcam, catalog# ab82592) 1 µg/mL, and anti-DnaJ (Enzo Life Sciences, catalog# ADI-SPA-410-D) 0.5 µg/mL. Ampicillin sodium, CAS number 69-52-3 (Duchefa Biochemie, catalog# A0104), erythromycin, CAS number 114-07-8 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog# E5389), chloramphenicol, CAS number 56-75-7 (Duchefa Biochemie), and kanamycin CAS number 56-75-7 (Duchefa Biochemie).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Antibody and Antibiotic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies and antibiotic product codes used are as follows: monoclonal anti-TEM (Abcam, UK ab12251-8A5A10) 0.5 µg/mL, polyclonal rabbit anti-SHV (custom-made by Eurogentec, Belgium) 1 µg/mL, chicken polyclonal anti-beta Galactosidase (Abcam, ab145634 antibody (ab9361) 2 µg/mL. Goat Anti-Mouse IgG HRP secondary antibodies (ab97040); Rabbit Anti-Mouse IgG HRP (ab6728); Goat Anti-Chicken HRP (ab97135).
The antibiotics used for this study: Penicillin G sodium (Benzylpenicillin sodium, Abcam, catalog # ab145634) 1 µg/mL, Ampicillin (Duchefa Biochemie, Netherlands, A0104.0025), tazobactam sodium salt (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog # T2820-10MG), erythromycin, CAS number 114-07-8 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog # E5389), chloramphenicol, CAS number 56-75-7 (Duchefa Biochemie), and kanamycin CAS number 56-75-7 (Duchefa Biochemie).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microbial Diversity Cultivation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four cultivation media were used for the microscopic fungi: malt extract agar (MEA), potato dextrose agar (PDA), Sabouraud agar (SDA), and yeast extract glucose Chloramphenicol agar (YGC) (all Hi-media, Czech Republic). Four different cultivation media were also used for bacteria: Reasoner's 2A agar (R2A), R2A + Rpf (VWR International, USA), tryptic soy agar (TSA), and TSA + Rpf (Hi-media, Czech Republic). Except for YGC, antibiotics were added to all of the above media. Chloramphenicol (Duchefa Biochemie, Netherlands) was added to the fungal media and nystatin (Duchefa Biochemie, Netherlands) to the bacterial media. In addition, all the cultivation media were prepared with 10-fold diluted nutrients than the concentrations indicated in the manufacturer's technical documentation to promote the growth of slow-growing species, thereby enhancing overall microbial diversity [26 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!