The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using anti rrm2

1

Western Blot Analysis of AML Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AML cells were lysed by sonication in 10 mM Tris‐Cl, pH 7.0, containing 1% SDS, protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Whole‐cell lysates were subjected to SDS‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, electrophoretically transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) and immunoblotted with antibodies. Anti‐γH2AX, anti‐H4 (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), anti‐WEE1, anti‐RAD51, anti‐p‐CDC25C(S216), anti‐cleaved (cf) caspase 3, anti‐c‐Myc, anti‐Bcl‐2, anti‐β‐actin (Proteintech Group, Chicago, IL, USA), anti‐CHK1, anti‐CDK2, anti‐MEK (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti‐p‐CDK1(Y15), anti‐CDK1, anti‐p‐CDK2(Y15), anti‐RRM1 and anti‐RRM2 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) antibodies were used for Western blot analysis. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li‐Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA), as described by the manufacturer. The fold changes in protein densitometry measurements were normalized to β‐actin and then compared with the vehicle control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CDKL3 and RRM2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The construction of the microarray and the following immunohistochemistry were carried out as described previously by Shanghai Biochip Company.39 Glioma and normal tissue sections from glioma patients were deparaffinized, repaired with citrate antigen, blocked, and treated with 5% goat serum for 15 minutes at room temperature. The tissue sections were stained by diluted primary anti‐CDKL3 (1:200; Bioss) or anti‐RRM2 (1:400; Abcam) at 4°C overnight. Tissue sections were then stained with DAB, counterstained with hematoxylin, and dehydrated with ethanol. Images were captured using an ImageScope v11 (Leica). All sections were scored by two independent pathologists in a blinded fashion. In particular, the intensity of positive‐staining cytoplasm or nucleus of CDKL3 was scored on a scale of 0‐3 (0, negative; 1, light brown; 2, medium brown; and 3, dark brown), which was multiplied by the corresponding value of positive percentage (1, less than 25%; 2, 25%‐50%; 3, 50%‐75%; and 4, more than 75%). The two scores of cellular cytoplasm and nucleus were added to estimate the expression level of CDKL3, which was divided into the high or low cut by the median total score 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibody-based Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The WB was performed using conventional protocols which are available elsewhere. The primary antibodies were anti-c-PARP (Abcam, #ab32064), anti-HMGB1 (Abcam, #ab18256), anti-GPX4 (Abcam, #ab125066), anti-GAPDH (CST, Boston, MA, USA, #5174), anti-HBA1 (Abcam, #ab191183), anti-PLIN4 (Abcam, #ab234752), anti-NNMT (Abcam, #ab223513), anti-STMN1 (Abcam, #ab52630), anti-RRM2 (Abcam, #ab209995), anti-CAPG (Abcam, #ab155688), anti-HIC1 (Abcam, #ab49326), anti-HNF4A (R&D Systems, PP-H6939-00 and Abcam, #ab181604), anti-KAT2B (Abcam, #ab12188), anti-Myc (CST, #2276) and anti-FLAG (CST, #8146).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti‐H4, anti‐ac‐Tubulin, anti‐CDK1, anti‐p‐CDK1(Y15), anti‐CDK2, ‐p‐CDK2(Y15), anti‐RRM1, anti‐RRM2, and anti‐AKT (Abcam), anti‐p‐S6(S240/244), anti‐p‐CDC25C, anti‐Wee1, anti‐c‐Myc (Cell Signaling Technologies), anti‐β‐actin, anti‐PARP, anti‐Bcl‐2, anti‐Bax, anti‐Mcl‐1, anti‐ERK (Proteintech), anti‐p‐AKT (T308), anti‐p‐AKT (S473) (Affinity Biosciences), anti‐Bim, anti‐Bcl‐xL, anti‐Bak, anti‐p‐ERK(T202/Y204), anti‐CHK1 (Selleck Chemicals), anti‐ac‐H4 and anti‐γ‐H2AX (Millipore) antibodies were used for Western blot analyses.
Western blotting was performed as described previously.33 Briefly, whole cell lysates were prepared by sonication in 10 mmol/L Tris‐Cl, pH 7.0, containing 1% SDS, protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics). The samples were separated by electrophoresis on SDS‐polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After blocking in TBS buffer (150 mmol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.4) containing 5% fat‐free milk for 1 hour at room temperature, the blots were incubated with a primary antibody overnight at 4°C and then incubated with a fluorescent‐labelled secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li‐Cor). Western blots were repeated at least three times and one representative blot is shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!