The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Primo star compound microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss

The Primo Star is a compound microscope designed for educational and routine laboratory use. It features a sturdy, ergonomic design and delivers high-quality optical performance for a wide range of applications. The microscope is equipped with a LED illumination system, a coarse and fine focus knob, and a mechanical stage for precise specimen positioning. The Primo Star provides reliable and consistent results in various educational and research settings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using primo star compound microscope

1

Taxonomic Identification of Cumacean Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 947 specimens (Table S2) were determined to the lowest possible taxonomic rank, based primarily on original species descriptions (e.g., Hansen, 1920 (link); Sars, 1900 ). Species identifications were conducted at the Department of Biological Sciences (University of Bergen, Norway) and DZMB Hamburg using either a ZEISS SteREO Discovery V8 or Leica MZ12.5 dissecting microscope. Dissected pereopods and mouth parts were assessed under a ZEISS Primo Star compound microscope. High quality pictures with depth of focus were taken with a Leica DFC400 digital compound microscope camera using the Z-stacking option in the Leica Application Suite imaging software. Current authoritative classification follows the catalogue World Cumacea Database (http://www.marinespecies.org/cumacea/, Watling & Gerken, 2019 ) in the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS Editorial Board, 2019 ). Additionally, comparative museums’ material has been obtained from the Center of Natural History Hamburg (CeNak) and the University Museum of Bergen (ZMBN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protoplast-Derived Moss Cell Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Colonies started from protoplast preparations were used rather than tissue fragments produced by routine propagation techniques. Week‐old tissue was used to generate protoplasts (as above) and 100 μl of liquid plating medium (PpNH4 containing 8.5% mannitol and 10‐mM CaCl2) containing roughly 60,000 protoplasts was added to six wells of a 12‐well plate for each of the following lines: WT, TC, sbh‐1, sbh‐2a, and sbh‐3 (Table S3). For each group of six wells, three contained PRMB with 10 μM t17:0, and three did not. After 4 days each cellophane disk was transferred to a small petri dish with PpNH4 medium, with or without 10 μM t17:0. One cellophane disk of each line was removed for imaging (and tissue harvesting for LCB analysis) at 8, 14, and 35 days following protoplast formation. Samples were imaged using a Zeiss Stemi dissecting microscope and a Zeiss Primostar compound microscope, both equipped with Excelis color digital 1080p cameras with displays. Chloronema and caulonema cell dimensions (length and width) were measured from calibrated images using ImageJ. Apical cells were not included in these measurements. The areas of gametophore phylloid cells were determined by tracing their outline using ImageJ. Confidence intervals for means and standard deviations of cell dimensional measurements were calculated by bootstrapping with 1000 resampled parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Helminth Parasites in Bat Necropsy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bats were sacrificed by an overdose of sodic pentobarbital injectable and preserved and fixed in a 10% formaldehyde neutral solution. The bats' abdominal and thoracic cavities and organs were examined with a stereoscopic microscope. The intestine was divided in three sections: 1) duodenum, 2) small intestine (jejunum and ileum), and 3) large intestine and rectum. The site of infection and the number of parasites found were registered and the specimens which were found detached from the host during the necropsy were not assigned to any particular intestinal section. Permanent and transitory slides were made in order to identify the helminths. The trematodes were dehydrated gradually in ethylic alcohol (70%, 96%), stained with Grenacher's carmin, and mounted in Canada balsam. The cestodes and nematodes were cleared with Aman's lactophenol. All parasites were photographed and measured using a Zeiss Primo Star compound microscope equipped with a digital camera (Zeiss Axiocam ERc 5s). One specimen of each species was deposited in the Colección Nacional de Parasitología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia, Buenos Aires, Argentina (MACN-Pa).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biofilm Enumeration and Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 7 d of biofilm development, the flow cells were disconnected and bacterial cells were collected by flushing the biofilm several times with cold PBS using syringes connected to each end of the flow cell [42 ]. Biomass removal from the flow cells was validated by CLSM. The biomass was serially diluted with media (M9-glucose for normal growth, M9-without a carbon source for starvation) and plated onto LB agar plates. The plates were incubated for 3 d at room temperature and colonies were enumerated and morphology determined by use of a compound microscope (Zeiss Primo Star Compound Microscope) with 4x magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Algal Identification Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We collected five mL water samples for algal identification at the start of the experiment, the day prior to perturbation (day 20) and at the end of the experiment (day 45). All algal samples were placed in a cooler for five to seven days before being taken to the lab to be analyzed. From each five mL sample we extracted a ten µl sub-sample, which was placed on a hematocytometer slide for counting. Using a Zeiss Primo Star compound microscope and the program Zen, we took pictures of each algal slide at 10x magnification. We took four pictures of each slide. Algae captured on each photo were manually counted and identified to the best of our ability using Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research algae guide (Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, 2014 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!